Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

O let Nancy have this in the House bill so it could get to the Senate. It's been in the soup from day one.

Photobucket

1 posted on 11/15/2009 2:51:48 PM PST by mmanager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: mmanager

How could America possibly exist if the government didn’t pay for women to murder their baby in their womb.


35 posted on 11/15/2009 3:16:52 PM PST by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager
Axelrod Signals Obama Will Try to Strip Abortion Language From Health Care Bill
37 posted on 11/15/2009 3:18:32 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager

I suspect it’s high time to start giving some moral support to these pro-life dems:

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Bart-Stupak/19260338693?ref=search&sid=1692335698.1161942884..1


39 posted on 11/15/2009 3:20:36 PM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager

Just heads up....Democrats are trying to turn the Healthcare debate into Abortion debate. This way they can frame Pro Choice verse Pro Life etc....to win back suburban women for healthcare.


41 posted on 11/15/2009 3:23:27 PM PST by GoMonster (GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grellis; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
authored by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich

43 posted on 11/15/2009 3:25:31 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager

Well, at least illegals won’t receive benefits. Because the’ll all be legal!


44 posted on 11/15/2009 3:30:18 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Springman; sergeantdave; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; ...

If you would like to be added or dropped from the Michigan ping list, please freepmail me.


45 posted on 11/15/2009 3:38:02 PM PST by grellis (I am Jill's overwhelming sense of disgust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager
Stick a federally funded fork in a baby's head for Obama!
46 posted on 11/15/2009 3:39:09 PM PST by glock rocks (Wait, what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager
I find it very interesting that the same Liberals who were so defensive about "what a woman does with her own body" re abortion, are the same ones -- who with this healthcare bill -- are now advocating that we now turn ALL right to our bodies over to the state.

If you argue that "a pregnant woman has a right to do with her body what she will", shouldn't that same argument apply to men, non-pregnant women and anyone else?

47 posted on 11/15/2009 3:40:19 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager

Try? Axelrod is a dufus.


50 posted on 11/15/2009 3:45:11 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Unseal the lock box containing every document pertaining to Obama's life, TODAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager

Don’t we still have a law on the books that would have to be repealed for federal funds to be used for abortions? Not that its existence makes me comfortable after last week.
Does anyone know?


58 posted on 11/15/2009 4:14:15 PM PST by RebelTXRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager
Obrtion O is at it again!

 

60 posted on 11/15/2009 4:22:04 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager
Obama's slyness and manipulation knows no bounds. His announcement is all a cunning ruse, an elaborate plan, a dastardly trick, a sleight of hand, an act of misdirection, a red herring.

Simply put, the abortion language will get pulled, the masses will go back to sleep, the Obamacare bill will pass the Sinate.....and then, lo and behold, later an undetected loophole will be found to enable taxpayer-funded abortions in the future.

Is there ONE freeper who believes in the sincerity of this sudden announcement by O'Lucifer himself.....or who believes the Dims will give up 'abortion', the mothers' milk of the radical liberal agenda?

Rush will analyze and expose this ruse tomorrow, I have no doubt.

Leni

61 posted on 11/15/2009 4:27:38 PM PST by MinuteGal (Bill O'Reilly: 9/8/09: "Communism is not a threat to us anymore"-10/20/09: "Obama is not a Marxist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager

He must not want it to pass. I wonder why?


62 posted on 11/15/2009 4:34:32 PM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager

okay, so let me put this in writing.

Here’s the Repub spin....let’s see if they get a clue.

Do NOT argue, not for one second, that a child is a child at conception. Don’t even go there.

Just suggest that pregnancy is very preventable nowadays. So why should the taxpayer pay for an abortion that could have been prevented?

Believe me, across the fruited plains ordinary Americans who carry this country on their backs will buy this argument in a minute. Keeps out the vitriol on the subject of when life begins....which would give the Dems a chance to point fingers at the pubs who would keep females pregnant and barefoot for their entire lives.

If things really get bad, the pubs could mention, just throwing it out there, that very few private plans pay for abortion either.

I mean hey, an abortion at a clinic costs maybe five or six hundred bucks, not much more. I know that’s not chump change but it’s do-able for most folks if desperate enough. All this arguing over such a silly thing.

The pubs got a sure thing on this one. Let’s see how it goes.


66 posted on 11/15/2009 5:13:12 PM PST by Fishtalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]



67 posted on 11/15/2009 5:13:35 PM PST by devolve ( . "I would caution you against jumping to conclusions!" - Barack Hasan Osama Junior - mmm mmm mmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager

I would have paid for his mother to have an abortion....


68 posted on 11/15/2009 7:09:51 PM PST by clintonh8r (Jumping to conclusions...it's what I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager

If they take abortion funding out of the bill, then it is acceptable? I am as pro-life as anyone on this forum, but I don’t want any healthcare bill whether or not it has abortion funding in it. It’s causing a red herring for the blue dogs to vote for the bill if the funding is not in the bill.


69 posted on 11/15/2009 7:25:03 PM PST by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager

Did Zero say this ...or is Axelrod telling the Puppet in Chief WHAT he will do.


76 posted on 11/16/2009 3:27:18 AM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mmanager
The left knows Americans do not want government controlled welfare death care, and they know America can't afford it. They're using abortion as a way to kill it, and they can blame it's failure on "The woman hating right wing."
They can pass this bill without the Republicans, and the blue dogs are just pretending, because they're jobs not only depend on the voters, they also depend on democrat funding and endorsements.

Abortion is just an excuse to save face.
Not only that, but I think the RINO Republicans are in on it. Had they not voted at all for the abortion bill (present), it would have forced the democrats to do it alone, and they wouldn't have taken that chance. The bill would have been defeated rather than passed.

77 posted on 11/16/2009 4:14:56 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson