Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACORN says US funding cut was unconstitutional (lawsuit filed on ACORN’s behalf in Brooklyn)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 11/12/09 | AP

Posted on 11/12/2009 12:09:02 PM PST by NormsRevenge

NEW YORK – ACORN has filed a lawsuit claiming that Congress violated the Constitution when it passed a law cutting off federal funding to the organization.

The Center for Constitutional Rights filed the lawsuit on ACORN's behalf Thursday in Brooklyn federal court. It claims the law was unconstitutional because it punitively targeted an individual organization.

Messages for comment left at the White House and the federal agencies named in the suit were not immediately returned.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; acorn; coi; constitution; corruption; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; fraud; funding; gimmegimmegimme; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

1 posted on 11/12/2009 12:09:03 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

ACORN is unconstitutional.


2 posted on 11/12/2009 12:10:07 PM PST by JoeMac ("Dats all I can stands 'cuz I can't stands no more!'' Popeye The SailorMan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It seems they are implying that ACORN has a constitutional right to federal tax money?


3 posted on 11/12/2009 12:10:18 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

They got this a little backwards. Funding was Un-Constitutional to begin with. Cutting funding is just enforcing the Constitution.


4 posted on 11/12/2009 12:10:29 PM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Suddenly, ACORN becomes aware of the US Constitution.
5 posted on 11/12/2009 12:11:24 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Ask not what the Kennedys can do for you, but what you can do for the Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I believe that these guys who work for the Center for Constitutional Rights....need to go back and actually study Constitutional rights.


6 posted on 11/12/2009 12:12:08 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

That is EXACTLY what they are claiming.


7 posted on 11/12/2009 12:12:09 PM PST by piytar (Go Away NRC, Steele, Graham, and the rest of the lib-loser GOP. WE'RE TAKING OUR PARTY BACK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RC2

And being unconstitutional, when does acorn start paying the country back.


8 posted on 11/12/2009 12:12:13 PM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

How was the funding in the first place Constitutional?


9 posted on 11/12/2009 12:12:20 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Huh?


10 posted on 11/12/2009 12:12:20 PM PST by Dallas59 (No To O -Time is going by really really really really slow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Talk about irony. LOL!


11 posted on 11/12/2009 12:12:48 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

No. Funding them in the FIRST place was un-Constitutional.


12 posted on 11/12/2009 12:13:14 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Is not the government funding of a private, partisan organization with taxpayer money unconstitutional?


13 posted on 11/12/2009 12:14:08 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier whose wife is expecting twins SONS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

ACORN has constitutional right to funding? lol!


14 posted on 11/12/2009 12:14:27 PM PST by luvbach1 (Worse than we could have imagined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

They who trample the Constitution now want to pick it up and dust it off in their favor...


15 posted on 11/12/2009 12:15:12 PM PST by RebelTXRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

definition of “Bill of Attainder”:

“These clauses of the Constitution are not of the broad, general nature of the Due Process Clause, but refer to rather precise legal terms which had a meaning under English law at the time the Constitution was adopted. A bill of attainder was a legislative act that singled out one or more persons and imposed punishment on them, without benefit of trial. Such actions were regarded as odious by the framers of the Constitution because it was the traditional role of a court, judging an individual case, to impose punishment.” William H. Rehnquist.


16 posted on 11/12/2009 12:15:12 PM PST by fifthvirginia (keeping their memory green)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JoeMac

BINGO! We have a winner.

And it’s on a number of levels, not just one.

Being funded by the government in the first place...
Registering as if an arm of the Democrat party...
Fraudulent Registrations...
Intimidation at the polls...

As free pass on all this...


17 posted on 11/12/2009 12:15:18 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Unseal the lock box containing every document pertaining to Obama's life, TODAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

ACORN funding is unconstitutional!


18 posted on 11/12/2009 12:16:00 PM PST by lonestar (Obama and his czars have turned Bush's "mess" into a national crisis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; JoeMac
It claims the law was unconstitutional because it punitively targeted an individual organization.

What was unconstitutional was federal funding of this preferentially targeted individual organization. Eliminating the funding was a corrective measure.

19 posted on 11/12/2009 12:16:06 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Where is MY funding from congress acorn? I would like to sit on my lazy fat butt and play politics all day for taxpayer dollars but I have a brain, a conscience and a work ethic.

If you need money then go look under your work boots. You lazy, reparation seeking,
over breeding, racist scumbags have had a free ride for far too long.

Get a job!!!


20 posted on 11/12/2009 12:16:27 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson