[albie]

Why do these “tight” races ALWAYS go against conservatives?

[from occupied ga]

and the democrats steal another election.

[pgkdan]

Hoffman should retract his concession and demand a recount if he doesn’t take the lead with absentees.

[ScottinVA]

So... let me get this straight. That race is still not completely decided? With military and other absentee votes still to be counted, Hoffman could conceivably pull ahead, no?

[KansasGirl]

It will be such a slap in the face to the media, Pelosi, and Obama if Hoffman ends up winning this race!

[PapaBear3625]

One of Hoffman’s problems (and a problem with conservatives all over the US) is that he was too polite. He should never have conceded until ALL the ballots were counted, especially including absentee ballots. At the least, it would have resulted in Pelosi having one less vote for ObamaCare.

[kidd]

This article is incredible!

Hoffman is down by 3,026 votes.
There are up to 10,200 absentee ballots.

If Hoffman wins 7175 of these, he wins. If he wins 6000 of these, there might be a recount.

And Owens was sworn in, yet New York state hasn’t certified the winner yet!

[Tennessee Nana]

Is it really really really not over yet ???

[mtrott]

Rush should run with this today, and so should Fox News. This needs to be gotten to the bottom of. This is very fishy business.

[DNME]

Would some conservative Republican PLEASE raise hell about vote fraud? The Dims will never do it, since they’re usually the beneficiaries, so it’s got to be a Republican. PLEASE?

The whole system needs a top to bottom review and cleaning. Stealing votes is absolutely WRONG no matter who is stealing them!

RAISE HELL!

[Heliand]

It doesn’t matter if Hoffmann wins.

Just like the Rats did in Indiana in 1984, they will refuse to seat the Republican, even if he wins. They’ll do it, because they have the power to do it.

[PGalt]

Interesting. Thanks for posting.

[sweetiepiezer]

ping

[chimera]

Hoffman will never go to Congress. The 'Rats will make sure of it, one way or another. They will either manufacture enough fraudulent votes for Owens to "win" after Hoffman pulls ahead (Gregoire in WA state, Franken in MN, the '84 Congressional contest in IN) , or they will change the rules so that the results can't be reversed (the Torrecelli fraud in NJ). And forget about the courts. As Coleman and Rossi found out, once the election is "in the books" (i.e., when the 'Rats say their candidate "won"), they will never reverse it.

The 'Rats always "win" close elections. They've done it many, many times. They would have done it in 2000 except some people got off their duffs and literally pounded on doors to be let in to oversee the "recount" and assure a fair process.

[calex59]

I said at the time(election night)that Hoffman conceded to early. Conservatives are always trying to take the highground and getting screwed when they do. However, if the absentee ballots give him the win, Owens will have to step down.

Won't that be a jab in the a** to the libs. something else to consider, Owen's vote for the health care boon doggle will have to be nullified also. It would still have a passing vote, but 219 to 216 looks much better and takes some of the wind out of their sails.

Perhaps the reason Reid suddenly decided to start debating the health care bill is because of the closing gap on this election.

[KoRn]

Even if Hoffman ended up with more votes, Pelosi probably wouldn’t seat him.

[Servant of the Cross]

Well, well, well. We must use the Dems battle cry (from the Nation) then ... shout it from the rooftops:

Rule One: Count EVERY Vote.

[org.whodat]

[Sir Gawain]

btt

[stylecouncilor]

ping