Posted on 11/10/2009 9:10:29 AM PST by VAFreedom
Carrie Prejean on Tuesday defended a recently surfaced erotic video of her as a youthful indiscretion and questioned whether it could actually be called a “sex tape” since no one else appears in it.
Prejean admitted to making the video of herself and sending it to her boyfriend when she was 17 years old.
(Excerpt) Read more at today.msnbc.msn.com ...
It’d seem to be far higher that 1%.
Carrie still stood with Christians that marriage was between a man and a woman. Despite her foolish tape, her modeling, her boob job........when push came to shove, when she was asked to speak out, she stood with Christians. I wish her well in her walk with Jesus. It’s a long walk and she will fall at times, but I think she will make it.
Yeah, you are kinda late aren’t you? lol
Not guilty!
Whoever submitted this tape would be in possession of child pornography correct? Surprising the liberal media doesn’t want to charge Carrie Prejean for creating and distributing child pornography.
The Left is out to discourage all conservative women. “Step up and we’ll destroy you.”
The boyfriend is trash but is bears to repeat, girls, don’t send pictures of yourself naked to anyone for any reason.
I don’t think that the feminist movement addresses the underlying problem here.
Carrie, when you’re in a hole, stop digging....
After the Vanessa Williams incident embarassed everyone involved in pageants, all participants are now required to attest that no potentially embarassing tapes, photos etc. exist that might embarass the entities that put on the pageants. She obviously lied if she attested that no such materials existed.
Pageants are profit seeking enterprises. She lied to be a part of the enterprise in search of her own fame and fortune. She is a sham.
If the truth were known, this is probably why Trump kicked her out after first standing beside her.
I hope so too.
We need the services of the former pervert in chief. He can determine if she made a sex tape. He can enlighten us with the meaning of the word “is” and the differences between sex acts and non sex acts.
It depends on what your definition of “is” is.
Won’t she need to be married first before being an O.C. Housewife?
Paris Hilton's brand is "skank," so there was no damage there. Kardashian's only brand before her tape was "second-tier skank," as Paris' friend. Besides, they don't need careers. They have daddy money.
The case of Vanessa Hudgens is trickier. FIrst, it wasn't a sex tape but a cell phone photo. Second, that Disney forgave her had more to do with the fact that HSM 3 was already in production. She hasn't worked for Disney since. Her career after that hasn't been particularly noticeable.pi>I think that Prejean was hoping for something more significant than "skank."
Well it’s from CBS, so it’s got to be true - right? That said, there’s a bit if a gap between sending your boyfriend a picture in your underwear and sending him a film of you masturbating.
Ya cain't fix stoopid!
BTW, isn't this child (under age) pornography?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.