Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems break rules to pass Cap and Tax out of committee
Fox News Channel | 11/5/09

Posted on 11/05/2009 6:47:58 AM PST by pabianice

Per Fox: Barbara Boxer has forced Crap and Tirade out of committee despite rule that at least two Republicans had to be present. No Repubs were there but she passed it anyway. Change you can believe in!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: capandtrade; healthcare; military; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: pabianice

So what happens next? It sounds like well they just did it, so what?


41 posted on 11/05/2009 7:36:11 AM PST by GoCards ("We eat therefore we hunt...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Need to get Bachmann as speaker of the house.


42 posted on 11/05/2009 7:45:36 AM PST by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I’ll say it once again; these Dems are willing to become political martyrs in return for making fundamental, irreversible changes to a free America. If they can ram through socialized medicine and a punishing global warming tax, redistribute as much wealth as possible to the unions, the nonproductive and their own pet causes as possible before the 2010 elections, they may be willing to be voted out with prejudice and hailed as left wing heroes for generations. If they can just screw everything up hopelessly right now, just screw it up so badly that no one can undo it, their kamikaze mission will be done. They know that they don’t have longer than another year.


43 posted on 11/05/2009 8:01:29 AM PST by Sender (It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

this is why they are loosing votes....people see something they hate in leaders arrogance


44 posted on 11/05/2009 8:04:03 AM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
I hope they keep this up, and I pray the FOX survives. In 2010 there will be a complete house cleaning (including Senate).
45 posted on 11/05/2009 8:04:10 AM PST by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

They only needed a quorum for markup, not for voting it out of committee.


46 posted on 11/05/2009 8:05:48 AM PST by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2378551/posts

American Thinker ^ | November 4, 2009 | Marc Sheppard

It seems Boxer cited a “provision in the rules” she claims allows her to proceed as long as a majority of committee members are present. Not that I don’t trust her, although I most certainly do not, but I thought a quick trip over to the EPW rules site for a look-see was in order.

Now, according to Rule 2 of the committee rules: [my emphasis]
“At committee business meetings, and for the purpose of approving the issuance of a subpoena or approving a committee resolution, one third of the members of the committee, at least two of whom are members of the minority party, constitute a quorum, except as provided in subsection (d).”

And it appears to be the language of subsection (d) that Boxer is attempting to play games with:
“No measure or matter may be reported to the Senate by the committee unless a majority of committee members cast votes in person.”

From a layman’s reading, one would surmise that although the bill can be reported out of committee with a simple majority, at least 2 Republicans need be present to consider any amendments. In which case, Boxer’s decision to continue markup sessions without minority representation would be as illegal as it is unprecedented.

Interestingly enough, Boxer’s deployment of the “nuclear option,” as many Republicans are referring to it, didn’t seem to bother Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina — the first Republican to endorse the bill. He and Senators Lieberman and Kerry just finished discussing the Bill before cameras, yet Graham said nothing about the Democrats’ impropriety. As it was, after all, his inexplicable turncoat actions that enabled Democrats and the MSM to stamp the now meaningless label “bi-partisan” on this disastrous legislation, surely something should have been said about this breach in EPW rules.

Prior to gaveling out for today’s lunchtime recess, Boxer repeated numerous times that she intended to abide by the rules.

The question is: Whose rules – those of the committee or those of the climate-hysterics currently controlling it?


47 posted on 11/05/2009 8:08:15 AM PST by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2378551/posts

American Thinker ^ | November 4, 2009 | Marc Sheppard

It seems Boxer cited a “provision in the rules” she claims allows her to proceed as long as a majority of committee members are present. Not that I don’t trust her, although I most certainly do not, but I thought a quick trip over to the EPW rules site for a look-see was in order.

Now, according to Rule 2 of the committee rules: [my emphasis]
“At committee business meetings, and for the purpose of approving the issuance of a subpoena or approving a committee resolution, one third of the members of the committee, at least two of whom are members of the minority party, constitute a quorum, except as provided in subsection (d).”

And it appears to be the language of subsection (d) that Boxer is attempting to play games with:
“No measure or matter may be reported to the Senate by the committee unless a majority of committee members cast votes in person.”

From a layman’s reading, one would surmise that although the bill can be reported out of committee with a simple majority, at least 2 Republicans need be present to consider any amendments. In which case, Boxer’s decision to continue markup sessions without minority representation would be as illegal as it is unprecedented.

Interestingly enough, Boxer’s deployment of the “nuclear option,” as many Republicans are referring to it, didn’t seem to bother Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina — the first Republican to endorse the bill. He and Senators Lieberman and Kerry just finished discussing the Bill before cameras, yet Graham said nothing about the Democrats’ impropriety. As it was, after all, his inexplicable turncoat actions that enabled Democrats and the MSM to stamp the now meaningless label “bi-partisan” on this disastrous legislation, surely something should have been said about this breach in EPW rules.

Prior to gaveling out for today’s lunchtime recess, Boxer repeated numerous times that she intended to abide by the rules.

The question is: Whose rules – those of the committee or those of the climate-hysterics currently controlling it?


48 posted on 11/05/2009 8:09:13 AM PST by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled
that wasn’t smart... now the bill can be nullified.

I don't see how it can get past a court challenge.

I don't think Boxer is that stupid. Instead I think the dems have wakened and are trying to get rid of this disaster.

They're relying on the Repubs to quash it. They'll avoid the blame for the economic chaos resulting, earn credit for their efforts, and label the Republicans as enemies of the environment.

Pretty good strategy, at least the best anyone in their position could come up with. Will it work?

49 posted on 11/05/2009 8:10:44 AM PST by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

tossing them out next year won’t matter. the dems are playing ‘all-in’ and want their massive agendas passed while they have the power ... at all costs. they don’t care if they lose seats, they figure they’ll get them back


50 posted on 11/05/2009 8:13:22 AM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

And even when its illegal - Timmy Geitner and more. Democrats don’t need to follow rules.


51 posted on 11/05/2009 8:16:33 AM PST by Marmolade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb
Boxer needs to be at the top of the list to visit when the torch and pitchfork brigade arrives soon.

It's getting crowded at the top of that list. But we can weed through the whole lot of them.
52 posted on 11/05/2009 8:17:30 AM PST by Dewey Revoltnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

Devore for Senate
(send the Boxer-rat packing)

https://www.fundraisingbynet.net/fbn/contributeFederal.asp?guidRegistration=585B5B5B


53 posted on 11/05/2009 8:20:46 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: pabianice; scripter; proud_yank; grey_whiskers; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

54 posted on 11/05/2009 8:28:39 AM PST by steelyourfaith (Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison! to s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Max Baucus, head of the finance committee, voted no. Inhofe says that means the bill is dead.


55 posted on 11/05/2009 8:33:52 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear; All

Senate panel approves Democratic climate bill

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE5A42WB20091105


56 posted on 11/05/2009 8:36:15 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Let’s SEE what the REPUBLICANS DO about this!!!!!! NOTHING????????? THIS is why we are REVOLTING the RINOS!!!!!!


57 posted on 11/05/2009 8:38:15 AM PST by pollywog (staying...... " Under His Wings" Psalm 91:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

So this means it was useless for them to pass it?


58 posted on 11/05/2009 8:42:15 AM PST by pollywog (staying...... " Under His Wings" Psalm 91:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Sender
I believe you are right! These radical democrats vision themselves as martyrs and they don't give a rat's ass if they will be reelected or not. They are all about screwing America as FAST as they Frickin' can. One day there will be hell for them to pay.
59 posted on 11/05/2009 8:49:49 AM PST by NorwegianViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Tyrants!

These bastards simply can't wait to steal our money and put us in straight-jackets, can they?

When are e-mails and phone calls going to morph into tar and pitchforks?

60 posted on 11/05/2009 8:51:49 AM PST by Gritty (Obama is a radical communist and is going to destroy this country-Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson