***shakes head***
Sick f***.
CZARsonist!
Odd. The family says he had “no radical political bent.” Friends say he “didn’t have a radical agenda.”
These just struck me as strangely worded disclaimers. Normally, you’d just say he was drunk, crazy, always one to do stupid things on a dare, etc. Plus, if that was the case, who dared him?
Throw the book at that SOB and put him in prison.
Interesting that this paper points out “originally from Texas.” Is this supposed to be proof of something? “He’s not one of us!” maybe?
Did everyone go and read the comments by his family. “Good person” Family is as worthless as him to defend him. An “oddball” arson. He is a lawyer with a local firm.
It gets even better. He is a Duke 2005 Theater major who took a year off to see the world.
http://theaterstudies.duke.edu/alumni
I am sure both institutions are proud of their graduate.
He is wearing a Harvard shirt in his perp walk photo. It sounds like he is newly minted (2005 + 3 years for school + 1 year to travel around the world).
I wonder if he has even taken the bar yet. Can you take the bar with a felony conviction???
Hope the POS does some hard time
Harvard Law? In the footsteps of Obama?
What’s with the “originally from Texas” stuff? Do they ever write “originally from Iowa”, or “originally from Mexico”?
What the heck?
Doesn’t sound like his friends or family are rallying to support him:
“Schroeder — who is charged with arson and reckless endangerment — remains in jail because his friends couldn’t pull together enough cash last night to pay his $3,000 bail.” http://gothamist.com/2009/11/02/911_chapel_arsonist_claims_he_was_d.php
He may be out by now, but $3000 is peanuts, especially for someone who’s been working at Sidley and Austin. He should have been able to pay it himself right out of his checking account.