Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is WAHR!! And he puts Obama on the hook for it. Hoffman wins, OBAMA loses!!

Hey, that's Reagan's plan: We win, they lose!!

Make it so!!

1 posted on 10/31/2009 12:58:18 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: Jim Robinson

we have snake face on the ropes.....love it!


109 posted on 10/31/2009 4:53:16 PM PDT by grace522 (your wallet is in jeopardy with democrats in office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Poor James...He’s never been the same since Mary insisted he get an addadicktomy....


110 posted on 10/31/2009 5:03:09 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
The old one will get you two more trick.
Dems are soooo stupid.
111 posted on 10/31/2009 5:06:51 PM PDT by Ramcat (Thank You American Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

“Next week marks one year since President Obama was elected. The amount of money we have in the bank will be used as an instant referendum on his first year.”

What the Hell does that mean!?


112 posted on 10/31/2009 5:16:44 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

“if Palin’s fundraising means that all those tea partying members of the right-wing fringe finally have the upper hand in their fight to bring back the George Bush days of disaster.”

If only we were so lucky to still have George Bush as president now instead of Obami. I’ll bet Pres. Bush would have made a decision supporting our generals right away.

But at least we know that Carville is scared. That is a good thing.


118 posted on 10/31/2009 6:40:39 PM PDT by ClarenceThomasfan (President Bush will go down as one of our greatest presidents (next to Ronald Reagan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Further to my post #112 that read: “Next week marks one year since President Obama was elected. The amount of money we have in the bank will be used as an instant referendum on his first year.”

What the Hell does that mean!?”

(I had to finish hanging a sliding glass door, so now I’m back for more. LOL)

I wonder if anybody has thought about the fact those Lefty donors that allegedly are going to match by $2.00 each donation from the little people were going to dump the big bucks into the Lefty til anyway? I doubt any of the Leftist supporting little people would think period, so CarVILE can get away with his bullshit.

Back to my previous question. I remember Ted Kennedy used to use gibberish eloquently matched to voice inflection as he spoke to the little people, and he could stand and say nothing, but still whoop them into a frenzy.

I would believe Mr. CarVILE may have picked up on that trick, because IMO what he said in the above statement was similar to the deserved disrespect Kennedy displayed to his contituents in those rallies.


123 posted on 10/31/2009 7:20:16 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Hey Carville, what happened to that 4o more years of Democratic Party dominance? Reality check, huh, you idiotic, non-prophesying moron.


125 posted on 10/31/2009 7:29:16 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
You won't demean us, James.
126 posted on 10/31/2009 7:33:26 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear ($$$$$OBAMA MONEY!!!$$$$$ /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Democratic strategist James Carville reacts to the 2002 midterm election results by placing a garbage can over his head.
Photobucket
I hope we see a rerun of this...

127 posted on 10/31/2009 7:36:42 PM PDT by ~Vor~ (A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
My favorite Carville pic.



Trash Can Carville.
128 posted on 10/31/2009 7:39:58 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Well, that’s a fine how-do-ya-do, Jimmy!

It’s the Obama, stupid! LOL. At least he didn’t call us ‘astroturfers’ and ‘teabaggers’, feh.

Hope no one has ANY extra money to send to his foolish self.
Keep rocking on, Sarah and fellow tea party PATRIOTS!!! We are having an impact on the anti-American liberals out there!!! :-)


129 posted on 10/31/2009 9:32:47 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

LOL! Carville is the one who is the nut job. The guy gets crazier each year. How the hell does Mary put up with this lunatic???


132 posted on 11/01/2009 12:24:13 AM PDT by AmericanSphinx71 (mmm mmm mmm, Chairman Mao Zedong Obama, mmm mmm mmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; All
LOL, got 'em shaking in their boots, ol' serpent head freaking out!

From TPX:

Fantastic news!  The liberal RINO in NY-23 has dropped out of the Special Election for Congress which sets up the likelihood of a great victory by Conservative Party candidate, Doug Hoffman.

The leaders of the Tea Party Express endorsed Hoffman, criticized the RINO Republican candidate, and advertised in support of Hoffman.  Such actions irked some in the GOP establishment and even some squishy tea party activists with other groups who didn't like us backing Conservative Doug Hoffman.

Our response was, and has been:  too bad.  Our country got itself into the mess it did because we had a Congress comprised of liberal Democrats and RINO Republicans who went went along with out-of-control deficit spending, a growth in the size and intrusiveness of government and a loss in personal liberty - first under a Republican president, and now under liberal Democrat Barack Obama's administration.

Here's the ad we had produced in support of Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman.  We congratulate you all on the first victory on the way to the 2010 elections!

Alright, that's the report on NY-23 for now.  We're writing this update to you from the bus in the Tri-Cities area of Central Washington.  We've had an incredible kickoff week for the Tea Party Express and are building more and more momentum.

 

P.S.  We'll keep updating our trip reports on the Tea Party Express II rallies at our blog - including going back and adding more details, pictures and news accounts of the rallies that have taken place over the past 6 days: http://teapartyexpressblog.blogspot.com/

Here's a picture from our HUGE rally in the Tri-Cities area that took place last night - posted on our blog:

Bought a windshield snow scraper tonite!

133 posted on 11/01/2009 12:58:04 AM PDT by Syncro (TPXII---It's Happening Now---Oct 25 to Nov 12th!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Was this from Obama’s campaign email list, or through the DNC? Just curious. :)

Definitely shows that Sarah is a force to be reckoned with and she definitely has them shaking in their boots! Go, Sarah, Go — and help get those tea party “nuts” in DC, it would be the BEST thing to happen in DC in a LONG time... Can you imagine representatives that actually REPRESENT their citizens, have read and understand the Constitution, AND who would READ the bills put before them??? I hope that dream can be made a reality!


139 posted on 11/01/2009 2:58:00 AM PST by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; Neil E. Wright; Bob J; Jeff Head
In just (1) editorial by Carvile, he says the following regarding those who still believe in our founding mores and values:

wingnuts'
lunatics;
nutjobs;
fringe;
nutcases.

Can someone, anyone, please explain to me how so-called intellectuals who have higher education degrees can be so dense about what works for humanity?

Point of fact, not ONE commune from the '60's still exists. Not ONE! Do you know why?

Because, like all communist entities, some in the commune didn't produce as much as others because they would still get there share of the produce. Those who did work hard for the commune became disenchanted because they were carrying the bigger load, while others just layed around doing their drugs or sucking up the production of those who were producing. There was NO incentive for the non-producers as long as they were taken care of.

I know all this for a fact. I had acquaintances back then that told me why they gave up on their Utopian communes. It wasn't because of the lice and other diseases that infiltrated their perfect little world. It was because they got tired of "carrying" all the no-loads.

I grew up on the streets of Los Angeles. I lived in cars and garages until I made my way with widget jobs, while never thinking those who had more were the enemy. Then, I joined the US Navy and made better of myself. Even then, I earned little money but was never envious of those who had more. I dreamed of being one of the bad "rich" guys.

What is wrong with people like Carvile's thinking? Are they really so engrossed with their "compassion" that they can't see how human character works? Don't bother to answer, I know the answer - they don't use their brains, they exist on "feelings". They believe socialism/communism can still work, if done differently. To them, ALL people should have the same outcome, not the same opportunity.

All people should be able to buy a house with no money down, free medical care, have (2) cars, a HDTV, a cell phone, a computer and access to the Internet, cable or satellite TV, and most importantly, a new fridge full of Colt 45. That is what we call "poor" in this country.

I'm simply amazed that these "intellectuals" haven't learned from history and have lowered the bar on what is considered poverty. Just look around the world for (5) minutes and you will see genuine poverty. I've been there and seen what "poor" is. Other than those who want to live on streets (which are the majority), there are NO poor in this Country.

Back on topic, tell me where I'm wrong. Carvile thinks those of us who appreciate self-worth and integrity are "nutcases".

143 posted on 11/01/2009 3:22:33 AM PST by A Navy Vet (An Oath Is Forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; Neil E. Wright; Bob J; Jeff Head
In just (1) editorial by Carvile, he says the following regarding those who still believe in our founding mores and values:

wingnuts'
lunatics;
nutjobs;
fringe;
nutcases.

Can someone, anyone, please explain to me how so-called intellectuals who have higher education degrees can be so dense about what works for humanity?

Point of fact, not ONE commune from the '60's still exists. Not ONE! Do you know why?

Because, like all communist entities, some in the commune didn't produce as much as others because they would still get there share of the produce. Those who did work hard for the commune became disenchanted because they were carrying the bigger load, while others just layed around doing their drugs or sucking up the production of those who were producing. There was NO incentive for the non-producers as long as they were taken care of.

I know all this for a fact. I had acquaintances back then that told me why they gave up on their Utopian communes. It wasn't because of the lice and other diseases that infiltrated their perfect little world. It was because they got tired of "carrying" all the no-loads.

I grew up on the streets of Los Angeles. I lived in cars and garages until I made my way with widget jobs, while never thinking those who had more were the enemy. Then, I joined the US Navy and made better of myself. Even then, I earned little money but was never envious of those who had more. I dreamed of being one of the bad "rich" guys.

What is wrong with people like Carvile's thinking? Are they really so engrossed with their "compassion" that they can't see how human character works? Don't bother to answer, I know the answer - they don't use their brains, they exist on "feelings". They believe socialism/communism can still work, if done differently. To them, ALL people should have the same outcome, not the same opportunity.

All people should be able to buy a house with no money down, free medical care, have (2) cars, a HDTV, a cell phone, a computer and access to the Internet, cable or satellite TV, and most importantly, a new fridge full of Colt 45. That is what we call "poor" in this country.

I'm simply amazed that these "intellectuals" haven't learned from history and have lowered the bar on what is considered poverty. Just look around the world for (5) minutes and you will see genuine poverty. I've been there and seen what "poor" is. Other than those who want to live on streets (which are the majority), there are NO poor in this Country.

Back on topic, tell me where I'm wrong. Carvile thinks those of us who appreciate self-worth and integrity are "nutcases".

144 posted on 11/01/2009 3:22:54 AM PST by A Navy Vet (An Oath Is Forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; Neil E. Wright; Bob J; Jeff Head
In just (1) editorial by Carvile, he says the following regarding those who still believe in our founding mores and values:

wingnuts'
lunatics;
nutjobs;
fringe;
nutcases.

Can someone, anyone, please explain to me how so-called intellectuals who have higher education degrees can be so dense about what works for humanity?

Point of fact, not ONE commune from the '60's still exists. Not ONE! Do you know why?

Because, like all communist entities, some in the commune didn't produce as much as others because they would still get there share of the produce. Those who did work hard for the commune became disenchanted because they were carrying the bigger load, while others just layed around doing their drugs or sucking up the production of those who were producing. There was NO incentive for the non-producers as long as they were taken care of.

I know all this for a fact. I had acquaintances back then that told me why they gave up on their Utopian communes. It wasn't because of the lice and other diseases that infiltrated their perfect little world. It was because they got tired of "carrying" all the no-loads.

I grew up on the streets of Los Angeles. I lived in cars and garages until I made my way with widget jobs, while never thinking those who had more were the enemy. Then, I joined the US Navy and made better of myself. Even then, I earned little money but was never envious of those who had more. I dreamed of being one of the bad "rich" guys.

What is wrong with people like Carvile's thinking? Are they really so engrossed with their "compassion" that they can't see how human character works? Don't bother to answer, I know the answer - they don't use their brains, they exist on "feelings". They believe socialism/communism can still work, if done differently. To them, ALL people should have the same outcome, not the same opportunity.

All people should be able to buy a house with no money down, free medical care, have (2) cars, a HDTV, a cell phone, a computer and access to the Internet, cable or satellite TV, and most importantly, a new fridge full of Colt 45. That is what we call "poor" in this country.

I'm simply amazed that these "intellectuals" haven't learned from history and have lowered the bar on what is considered poverty. Just look around the world for (5) minutes and you will see genuine poverty. I've been there and seen what "poor" is. Other than those who want to live on streets (which are the majority), there are NO poor in this Country.

Back on topic, tell me where I'm wrong. Carvile thinks those of us who appreciate self-worth and integrity are "nutcases".

145 posted on 11/01/2009 3:23:25 AM PST by A Navy Vet (An Oath Is Forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
"Send a message to Sarah Palin and those tea party nutcases who think they can retake Congress."

I do believe he just declared war upon us. Bring it on!

148 posted on 11/01/2009 5:25:59 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Where's The Birth Certificate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Send the Snake your two cents, literally. It will cost more money to process the two cents than the two cents value. Make sure you ask for a tax receipt that will cost them postage, an envelope and paper receipt, ink etc.
151 posted on 11/01/2009 7:14:34 AM PST by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Help our Special Interest Lobby stop these citizens and their uprising! Doesn’t sound very Marxist??

Pray for Americas Freedom


153 posted on 11/02/2009 5:32:03 AM PST by bray (Silent No More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson