Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dallas Mom Fighting Law Allowing Kids To See Porn
(CBS 11 / TXA 21) ^ | Jay Gormley

Posted on 10/29/2009 1:17:39 PM PDT by Dubya

A Dallas mother wants to change an obscure Texas law that allows parents to show their young children hardcore pornography.

Crystal Buckner claims her ex-husband made their two little girls watch graphic sex videos, but Buckner says the law protects him from being prosecuted.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbs11tv.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: buckner; crystalbuckner; parenting; porn; pornography; pornographyintexas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 10/29/2009 1:17:40 PM PDT by Dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dubya

WTH? This guy is a sicko.
Why the hell does he have custody, anyways?


2 posted on 10/29/2009 1:25:25 PM PDT by ronniesgal (is it still okay to say 'spooky' this Halloween, or is that racist now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

She married the man and had 2-kids with him and she didn’t know he was a bad man? Some things can’t be fixed.

This is an example of why divorce and porn are so destructive of our culture. It is not just your private business.


3 posted on 10/29/2009 1:29:30 PM PDT by donna (Chick-news. They report on what they love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

The guy is twisted but there is more to this story than anybody is telling. I want to know the “back story”!


4 posted on 10/29/2009 1:30:11 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronniesgal

Why indeed does he have custody?

It’s not uncommon for one parent to make up horror stories about their ex - especially when they’re fighting over custody. There’s no reason to jump to conclusions about either of these individuals since we don’t have all the facts.


5 posted on 10/29/2009 1:32:02 PM PDT by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

well that is true.


6 posted on 10/29/2009 1:33:26 PM PDT by ronniesgal (is it still okay to say 'spooky' this Halloween, or is that racist now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ronniesgal

This is disgusting, but I still do not want the government to tell me what I can or can not teach to my children.


7 posted on 10/29/2009 1:37:19 PM PDT by VAFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ronniesgal; eclecticEel
Why the hell does he have custody, anyways?

Something isn't right. The story says that the father has custody, but the link in the story to the AG's opinion says the girls were visiting their father.

8 posted on 10/29/2009 1:37:40 PM PDT by Between the Lines (For their sins of 50 million abortions God gave them over to be an ObamaNation {Romans 1:24-32})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom

ok, but I think hardcore porn is a poor choice of teaching tool


9 posted on 10/29/2009 1:40:40 PM PDT by ronniesgal (is it still okay to say 'spooky' this Halloween, or is that racist now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

That’s a good question for you and me but if porn is legal and okay for adults why is it bad for kids?


10 posted on 10/29/2009 1:41:12 PM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

Is it established as fact that he did it?


11 posted on 10/29/2009 1:42:20 PM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

Exactly, if you listened to my husbands ex wife she’d tell you lies about everything under the sun about us. She’s tried it all until the police don’t believe her anymore.

Besides, this is a huge slippary slope...once you pass a limitation, who gets to say what’s appropriate material.

There are already child abuse statutes that include exposing the children to sexually explicit acts/material here.


12 posted on 10/29/2009 1:42:34 PM PDT by call meVeronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ronniesgal

correct, in this case, if there is a law that ‘allows’ parents to show porn, we should remove that.


13 posted on 10/29/2009 1:43:07 PM PDT by VAFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom

I think we have to have common sense and not think teaching pornography or the virgin birth of Christ to be equally protected by the constitution. If the government of Texas go after parents making their kids watch porn, we don’t make a fuss. If they go after parents teaching creation, we make a fuss.


14 posted on 10/29/2009 1:44:55 PM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

Porn is legal for adults. But I would not agree that it is okay for adults. Alcohol is legal for adults but we have laws to prevent parents from giving their children alcohol.

That does not mean that I want people arrested for letting their children have a sip of wine from time to time. But I do not want it legal for parents to have keg parties for underage kids.


15 posted on 10/29/2009 1:51:20 PM PDT by Truth is a Weapon (Truth, it hurts soooo good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Truth is a Weapon

Porn is ideas not physical substances being put in the body. Limiting thought another matter no matter how repugnant it may be.


16 posted on 10/29/2009 1:54:19 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Dubya

Thats outrgeous, only teachers have the right to show porn to kids.


18 posted on 10/29/2009 1:57:58 PM PDT by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com .... I am a rogue nobody. One of millions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

For those of you not from TX or never having been divorced with kids in TX, let me clarify something odd about this story.

First of all, TX law caters to the mother. For the mother not to have custody, she either voluntarily gave up custody or was a really bad abusive/neglectful mother.

It took me almost 5 years to get custody of my boys from their abusive mother. She was even arrested and found guilty of child abuse, but as one attorney told me, in TX the courts believe the mother should have the kids no matter what, even if she is a prostitute or a drug dealer. I even know of a case in which a mother took a 2-yr old child with her to turn tricks and the dad, who was very clean-cut, still could not get custody.

Also, according to national research, some sort of sexual abuse is the most common accusation a mother makes against a father in order to gain custody. Parental alienation is the second most common accusation.

There is certainly more to this story than the mother is letting on. She lost custody for a very good reason.


19 posted on 10/29/2009 1:59:46 PM PDT by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Not showing kids porn is “limiting thought”?? You spend too much time googling lolita sites dude.


20 posted on 10/29/2009 2:00:04 PM PDT by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com .... I am a rogue nobody. One of millions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson