Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS SUIT AGAINST OBAMA & ROBERTS TO BE CONFERENCED ON 11/06/09
My own self as I'm the SCOTUS Petitioner herself ^ | 10/28/09 | Susan Herbert

Posted on 10/28/2009 10:48:59 AM PDT by susanconstant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: xjcsa

“Thus here I am again, entering having already won my case as the raest of all conditions were realized in the US and only I knew it.”

You lost me here. I’m no scholar, but jeez, come on now!


41 posted on 10/28/2009 11:26:16 AM PDT by pappyone (New to Freep, still working a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salamander; Slings and Arrows; Markos33; susanconstant; All

By the way, research has shown that Susan is the long-lost grandchild of Malachi Constant, hero of Vonnegut’s “Sirens of Titan” and as such has been living in a Chrono Synclastic Infundibulum for the bulk of her adult life.

This has not inhibited her education. She currently holds the James Joyce Chair of Law at Ulysses University, located at Finnegan’s Wake in Dublin.


42 posted on 10/28/2009 11:27:30 AM PDT by shibumi (" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: susanconstant
From article: THE US DEFAULTED VIA FAILING TO RESPOND TO A PRIOR SCOTUS SUIT ON 11/05/08, the day after the election, lol. Actual default is the 2000 election and BVG; legal default occurred on 11/05/09.

Did we flash forward?

43 posted on 10/28/2009 11:29:11 AM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Can you imagine what the first draft looked like?


44 posted on 10/28/2009 11:29:29 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: susanconstant; shibumi
Thorazine
45 posted on 10/28/2009 11:33:00 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("When France chides you for appeasement, you know you're scraping bottom." --Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob

geeee.......thanks


46 posted on 10/28/2009 11:33:07 AM PDT by joe fonebone (I am racist, hear me roar....I don't give a crap anymore....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bobsatwork

oh, that is much better....clear as a bell now..... :)


47 posted on 10/28/2009 11:34:23 AM PDT by joe fonebone (I am racist, hear me roar....I don't give a crap anymore....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

It appears this suit, after a fast look through, is trying to get the Supreme Court to define the first three words in our US Constitution “We the People” which could/should have applicability to the Obama eligibility suits.


48 posted on 10/28/2009 11:36:41 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster
The future dates are real. Veteran Freepers use the Echo Park Time Travel Mart
49 posted on 10/28/2009 11:40:37 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

*


50 posted on 10/28/2009 11:41:39 AM PDT by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
Anyone understand this?

I think so. See post 48.

51 posted on 10/28/2009 11:41:56 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen

LOL I work in the Law and I kept getting lost. I do, however, wish that ONE Law Suit would be given standing and that Discovery would be required and that the WE the People, would get the very answers they so rightfully deserve. CO


52 posted on 10/28/2009 11:43:02 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

What do your favorite drugs have to do with this topic?


53 posted on 10/28/2009 11:44:58 AM PDT by Brown Deer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
It appears this suit, after a fast look through, is trying to get the Supreme Court to define the first three words in our US Constitution “We the People” which could/should have applicability to the Obama eligibility suits.

Godspeed, Susan.

54 posted on 10/28/2009 11:51:07 AM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?s=9a2e569e9b007c0cab86b04f4e30c7fd&p=5246884&postcount=25


55 posted on 10/28/2009 11:56:25 AM PDT by smokingfrog (No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in session. I AM JIM THOMPSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: pappyone; LucyT; All

I heard a radio program on the issues this lawyer tried to convey in this rant. Even then, it would take a week of studying highly litterate correspondence and discussions with the lawyers involved in this case, to understand the legal issues they are pursuing.

Here is one thing I got from the program: The original constitution was not changed to accomodate many of the changes Congress has made to it in order to accomodate the present view or state of the constitution. For example, the real constitution was not properly altered to accomodate the Federal Reserve and that changed the government from being a republic to being a corporation. The people have been made into State Corporation owned assests/slaves in which the Federal Reserve uses as collateral to gain credit. This was enacted w/o the necessary change to the constitution along with a whole trail of changes to accomodate this illegal, unconstitutional change.

The constitution has been rewritten to fit illegal changes to it, but there is an actual, real constitution on file and it is the only real and active constitution. This is the constitution Susan is saying the government refused to turn over to her and she got a court order forcing the government to submit that constitutional document to her. Still they refused to release it.

Further, she says the constitution requires the Congress to assure NBC and the response she got from a Congresscritter claimed they were dependent upon a University organization (fact check) to perform a constitutional duty assigned to congress alone. They can not delegate to Universities or anyone who is not a constitutional officer, duties of the Congress which are assigned by the constitution.

That is all I can remember. I don’t remember laws and all the detail discussed on the radio program I heard about six months ago.


56 posted on 10/28/2009 11:59:20 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

You should read original tax law as written by Congress.


57 posted on 10/28/2009 12:00:11 PM PDT by ADSUM (Democracy works when citizens get involved and keep government honest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
Anyone understand this?

I am a lawyer, and I can tell you that most of this is gibberish.

To the extent I can understand what she is saying (which is not too far), she filed a Petition for Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court (a document asking SCOTUS to review a lower court decision; in this case the lower court decison was apparently a dismissal of an Obama eligibility case).

The Government didn't file a response to her Petition in the Supreme Court, so she thinks she won by default. She is wrong-- in the U.S. Supreme Court, unlike in lower courts, the Respondent is not required to file anything; the Supreme Court declines to hear over 90% of the cases it is asked to hear, so it is permitted (and quite common) for the Respondent to ignore a Certiorari Petition.

If her Certiorari Petition is as incoherent as the posted message, there is no way the Supreme Court will get to page 2, much less grant it.

58 posted on 10/28/2009 12:00:12 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: susanconstant

Hmmm, delicious word salad. Pass the croutons.


59 posted on 10/28/2009 12:01:37 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

Full speed ahead for OP susanconstant.
SaraJohnson, Thank you for your synopsis!


60 posted on 10/28/2009 12:06:26 PM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson