It appears this suit, after a fast look through, is trying to get the Supreme Court to define the first three words in our US Constitution “We the People” which could/should have applicability to the Obama eligibility suits.
*
Godspeed, Susan.
I’m gonna read it again, but that does seem to be the gist of this case/suit. Keep in mind that judges have speciously claimed we the people do not have standing to question the federal oligarchs, of course.
What does the phrase "natural born citizen" mean? Must a citizen be born within the US or does it mean one or both of his or her parents must be American citizens? Does Barack Obama fulfill this requirement? What is must a citizen produce to then prove they are a "natural born citizen" as only that and age 35 is named as requirement to then legally hold this office? Is a registration of birth certificate acceptable or must a person produce an actual birth certificate issued by a state and so not a registration only?That's the first time I've heard it described this way... she is claiming that BO only provided a "registration of a birth certificate" [which was not even "Accepted by State Registrar"] not an actual birth certificate.
Godspeed, Susan
The People, the military and SCOTUS constitute vertical checks and balances aka moral authority aka will. The People is the constitutionally set government of the US not the offices and not the paper as the offices and the paper are dead institutions only. I’m invoking vertical checks by demanding SCOTUS recognize We The People as the constitutioanlly set government, to recognize the will of The People as that is to be the will of the Constitution.
You are a body of belief; you are supposed to be the living embodiment of the Constitution. No currently sitting officer embodies the will of the law; no currently sitting officer embodies the will of The People. In fact they no longer embody even one single letter of the law let alone a word or clause because of Obama & Co - all of election 08.