I heard a radio program on the issues this lawyer tried to convey in this rant. Even then, it would take a week of studying highly litterate correspondence and discussions with the lawyers involved in this case, to understand the legal issues they are pursuing.
Here is one thing I got from the program: The original constitution was not changed to accomodate many of the changes Congress has made to it in order to accomodate the present view or state of the constitution. For example, the real constitution was not properly altered to accomodate the Federal Reserve and that changed the government from being a republic to being a corporation. The people have been made into State Corporation owned assests/slaves in which the Federal Reserve uses as collateral to gain credit. This was enacted w/o the necessary change to the constitution along with a whole trail of changes to accomodate this illegal, unconstitutional change.
The constitution has been rewritten to fit illegal changes to it, but there is an actual, real constitution on file and it is the only real and active constitution. This is the constitution Susan is saying the government refused to turn over to her and she got a court order forcing the government to submit that constitutional document to her. Still they refused to release it.
Further, she says the constitution requires the Congress to assure NBC and the response she got from a Congresscritter claimed they were dependent upon a University organization (fact check) to perform a constitutional duty assigned to congress alone. They can not delegate to Universities or anyone who is not a constitutional officer, duties of the Congress which are assigned by the constitution.
That is all I can remember. I don’t remember laws and all the detail discussed on the radio program I heard about six months ago.
Full speed ahead for OP susanconstant.
SaraJohnson, Thank you for your synopsis!
No offense, but was it really really really late night radio?
The old secret Constitution plot. Where is Nicholas Cage when you need him?
I did not get a court order demanding to see the Constitution, lol. Upon a crooked Jax Federal judge sending me discovery papers after I caught him colluding with a fellow judge to then sink my case instead of sending it ahead as their own court rules state they must when they both knew only SCOTUS could hear this case I had enough. I wrote back:
“DISCOVERY?? WHAT DISCOVERY??? The Constitution is hanging on a wall in the Smithsonian! Do you mean to tell me that you are actually going to have me fill this out and so ORDER the Supreme Court to cough up The Constitution, the one our Founders wrote? Or do we all have to take a field trip to the Smithsonian to then see it? I’ve seen it; I’ve read it. WHO issues an order to then force SCOTUS to produce The Declaration and The Constitution upon a motion of discovery??? Isn’t that you admitting you do not know it and do not believe it exists and so are not basing your rulings upon it? That’s been obvious from day one! Equal protection has never been applied to me; women have never, ever had actual legal power in this nation even though we began acting to cast a vote in 1920. My vote is not realized; it’s a meaningless action. Trust me: America and US law has been discovered. I know as I my own self discovered it. I own that knolwledge! The Justices have seen it and do rule upon it. They know US law too.” Close to my exact words but not exact.