Skip to comments.
Orly on O'Reilly coming up on Fox - (After an hour of teasers, no Orly)
foxnews
Posted on 10/27/2009 5:03:56 PM PDT by Jean S
Orly coming up...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: billoreilly; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; fnc; loon; orlytaitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 last
To: Free Per the Constitution
Said Congress investigated .. where was I?
61
posted on
10/27/2009 6:41:14 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
To: CaptRon
who is you people and who said she could win at anything?
I never, infact I never even mentioned her so I have no idea what so ever what got you on that rant to me.
I’m on about big mouth O.R. and how the great arrogant one said he could get the B/C if he wanted and has not so either he should put up or shut up .
Or
Maybe he could put the question to bed like others claim they could instead of their usual left wing crap of name calling.
62
posted on
10/27/2009 6:45:20 PM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage is between a man and a woman, end of. -end racism end affirmative action)
To: CaptRon
Would you have her defend you for a jay walking charge?
63
posted on
10/27/2009 6:53:26 PM PDT
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: Frantzie
“Fox should dump BOR(e). Get Lou Dobbs for 5 pm and give Beck the Leprechauns time slot.”
good idea
64
posted on
10/27/2009 7:11:34 PM PDT
by
BonRad
(As Rome goes so goes the world)
To: trumandogz
Would you have her defend you for a jay walking charge?I'll bet an Orly Taitz defense would turn a jaywalking charge into a $20,000 fine.
65
posted on
10/27/2009 7:24:28 PM PDT
by
Drew68
To: Drew68
To: Jean S
Understand totally. Before the panel came on I also was under the false impression that Orly would be on. Should have known. I was getting geared-up for a big slap down by OâReilly against Orly and the pursuit to try and find the truth of why the President of the United States refuses to open to the public viewer-ship of a simple birth certificate that would put the whole controversy to rest.
To: mnehring
"Her book is brilliant and she really is the future of our party." She's an atheist. It's immaterial to me, but it probably won't to many others, FWIW.
68
posted on
10/27/2009 8:22:51 PM PDT
by
OldDeckHand
(No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
To: OldDeckHand
It doesn’t really. So was Ayn Rand, it doesn’t change the importance of her philosophy.
69
posted on
10/27/2009 8:27:09 PM PDT
by
mnehring
To: classified; Jean S
I wonder of Orly was originally scheduled and something happened. From what I understand O’Reilly only records most segments within three hours of airtime, a major snafu, no-show, or something else, may not change promo bumps.
70
posted on
10/27/2009 8:29:08 PM PDT
by
mnehring
To: mnehring
Or maybe like that other special about a week or so ago that suddenly did not happen on Hannity could be a red flag reminder. Remember back. There was an announcement that Hannity was to have a special with latest news on Obama’s associations and everyone tuned in to find that there was nothing. Perhaps O’Reilly and FOX got the full brunt pressure to not allow Orly on. I mean this would be her first appearance, right. It would put the B.C. topic out there up and front for people to try and digest why Obama is showing his birth certificate. I say they got pressure big time.
Glenn Beck needs to put her on.
To: Frantzie
They promised Geraldo no Dobbs.
72
posted on
10/28/2009 10:15:53 AM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(DC only had about 31,000 doses of vaccine, yet two relations of Obama got it!)
To: Jean S
To: Frantzie
shoulda dumped zero’pinhead long ago...
74
posted on
10/28/2009 1:15:03 PM PDT
by
gunnyg
(Just An Old Gunny ~ And *Still* Not A F'en Commie Basterd!)
To: Aria
Lise said this has been litigated....well, if you call getting dismissed for lack of standing litigation. And she also said he produced the documentation from Hawaii....well, thats news to me. Didn't hear the Hawaii comment but what was she saying about his being vetted by the Senate or Congress? When did all the occur?
75
posted on
10/28/2009 4:36:47 PM PDT
by
StarFan
To: Aria
Lise said this has been litigated....well, if you call getting dismissed for lack of standing litigation. And she also said he produced the documentation from Hawaii....well, thats news to me. Didn't hear the Hawaii comment but what was she saying about his being vetted by the Senate or Congress? When did all the occur?
76
posted on
10/28/2009 4:37:12 PM PDT
by
StarFan
To: StarFan
This was on O’Reilly last night - you had to pay attention because Lise dismissed it quickly....as if zero had gone through litigation and the whole matter is settled. HA!
77
posted on
10/28/2009 5:54:04 PM PDT
by
Aria
( "The US republic will endure until Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the people's $.")
To: roses of sharon; mnehring; OldDeckHand; LucyT; ExTexasRedhead; ml/nj
Yes, I saw the S. E. Cupp interview video that you linked to, Ms. Roses of Sharon. The future of the Republican Party? Well, she doesn't seem to have any intention of running for public office, but a run for Congress from a winnable district might be a good suggestion. I certainly think she has a great intellect, plus excellent speaking and argument skills, especially for someone so young. (She let out that she just turned 30.)
I'm afraid that she will have have to spend at least a few years in public office before you can call her one of the leaders of the GOP. At present, Sarah Palin has a pretty big jump over her.
In addition, she has a pretty big skeleton in her closet that could well tarnish her "conservative" credentials: she confessed that she's been working for the for the NY Slimes for quite a while.
To: Aria
Guess I didn't phrase my question clearly. I watched the episode, but thought I heard Lis say that the issue was fully vetted by congress prior to the election and questioned when the heck that took place.
I heard Lis dismiss it almost as quickly as she did when defending Clinton during impeachment.
79
posted on
10/29/2009 7:07:25 AM PDT
by
StarFan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson