Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statisticians: "Global Cooling" a Myth (AP barf)
Associated Press ^ | Oct. 25, 2009

Posted on 10/27/2009 9:45:41 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

(AP) Have you heard that the world is now cooling instead of warming? You may have seen some news reports on the Internet or heard about it from a provocative new book.

Only one problem: It's not true, according to an analysis of the numbers done by several independent statisticians for The Associated Press.

The case that the Earth might be cooling partly stems from recent weather. Last year was cooler than previous years. It's been a while since the super-hot years of 1998 and 2005. So is this a longer climate trend or just weather's normal ups and downs?

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agw; globalwarming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Free ThinkerNY
Hey Warmthers!

I can see how a greenhouse or a glass tank full of CO2 could be used to demonstrate heat retention.

At .034% concentration in the atmosphere, the CO2 molecules aren't close enough to even see each other...much less form a layer.

Steaming piles!

21 posted on 10/27/2009 7:43:07 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs, nothing more than bald haired hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

In my political methods class, I learned that statistics can be used to lie about a subject.


22 posted on 10/27/2009 8:01:28 PM PDT by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Well IIRC we haven’t had a single day of temps that have hit 100f in about 5 years.All years prior to that it would do that for at least a week each year. Last summer it never got to 90ºf even once.


23 posted on 10/27/2009 8:24:16 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
Anyone who wants to go through my posts over the last 1-2 years will see that I have been advising caution about the “cooling” trend.
Hmmmm ... here's what Roger Pielke Senior said on the Borenstein AP statistics article:
This article, however, (which is not a true independent assessment if the study was completed by NOAA scientists) is not based on the much more robust metric assessment of global warming as diagnosed by upper ocean heat content. Nor does it consider the warm bias issues with respect to surface land temperatures that we have raised in our peer reviewed papers; e.g. see and see.

...

As discussed on my weblog and elsewhere (e.g. see and see), the upper ocean heat content trend, as evaluated by its heat anomalies, has been essentially flat since mid 2003 through at least June of this year. Since mid 2003, the heat storage rate, rather then being 0.6 W/m2 in the upper 750m that was found prior to that time (1993-2003), has been essentially zero.

Nonetheless, the article is correct that the climate system has not cooled even in the last 6 years. Moreover, on the long time period back to 1880, the consensus is that the climate system has warmed on the longest time period. Perhaps the current absence of warming is a shorter term natural feature of the climate system.

However, to state that the “[t]he Earth is still warming” is in error. The warming has, at least temporarily halted.

The article (and apparently the NOAA study itself), therefore, suffers from a significant oversight since it does not comment on an update of the same upper ocean heat content data that Jim Hansen has used to assess global warming.


24 posted on 10/27/2009 8:37:52 PM PDT by _Jim (Conspiracy theories are the tools of the weak-minded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY; grey_whiskers; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

25 posted on 10/27/2009 9:41:58 PM PDT by steelyourfaith (Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison! to s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

See this: http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=1269


26 posted on 10/28/2009 4:57:58 AM PDT by mattstat (http://wmbriggs.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Thanks for your linked articles and analysis. It took me a little while to get through them, but it was well worth it.


27 posted on 10/29/2009 8:33:46 AM PDT by arnoldfwilliams (If it were, it would be: if it could be, it might be; but, as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson