Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich: 'You can't have a purely right-wing majority'
CNN ^

Posted on 10/26/2009 9:21:18 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Sub-Driver

“You can’t have a purely right-wing majority; you can’t have a purely left-wing majority.”

Oh really? I guess the democrats didn’t get the memo.


41 posted on 10/26/2009 9:39:48 AM PDT by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So let me get this straight......vote for a flaming liberal with an R by her name and end up with same flaming liberal voting with the Demonrats and join her kindred spirits Collins and Snowe....just to put another, ahem, REPUBLICAN in the House? How’s about CONSERVTIVES vote for a REAL Conservative and tell you and your cohorts to go to hell?? I like my idea better.....:)


42 posted on 10/26/2009 9:39:50 AM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We have a leftwing majority in power now Newt. We can’t change it by joining them.


43 posted on 10/26/2009 9:40:39 AM PDT by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com .... I am a rogue nobody. One of millions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Isn’t “right wing” a Clinton word? LOL

Newt’s letting his real nature spill out for all to see isn’t he.


44 posted on 10/26/2009 9:41:26 AM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Hey, Newt! WE are trying to get at least one Conservative in Congress forget the majority and your are torpedoing this guys chances.


45 posted on 10/26/2009 9:42:08 AM PDT by WaterBoard (Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money to spend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Gingrich: "I've been twice divorced because of adultery and three times married so I've decided to become a Catholic!"

Gingrich: "Let's have an open debate on global warming...it's probably a fact!"

Gingrich: "We should make it easier for guest workers to come into the USA!"

Gingrich: "You know, maybe women should have a choice."

etc., etc., etc.

46 posted on 10/26/2009 9:43:06 AM PDT by meandog (GWB IS the reason for BHO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Newt, most people do recognize that not every elected Republican will be perfect, but electing a democrat claiming to be a republican because the district is republican doesn’t help the party.


47 posted on 10/26/2009 9:43:48 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
You can't have a purely right-wing majority

Newt, Scuzzy is so far left she would be to the left of the center in the Dem Party. She is almost entirely outside the orbit of the GOP on all of its platform.

48 posted on 10/26/2009 9:44:18 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Which part of the Contract with America does Newt consider to be "moderate" or "centrist"? It sounded pretty darn conservative to me.

If you put Party above Principles you will end up with no Party and no Principles...

49 posted on 10/26/2009 9:45:08 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
"you can’t have a purely left majority...yet that’s what we somehow have!"

Temporarily. Obama used the campaign rhetoric of a conservative - less taxes, more efficient government, win at all costs in Afghanistan, etc, etc. He used that jargon to attract moderates/independents, and he did.

But, Obama then went and governed as a completely orthodox left-winger - raising taxes, spending with reckless abandon, criticizing America while abroad etc, etc. And, as a result, those same independents/moderates that carried him to victory are now running for the exits and account almost entirely for his plunge in the polls.

Having said that, Gingrich is wrong to endorse this lady in NY, because not only is she not a social conservative or a national defense conservative, she's not even a a fiscal conservative. To win and keep the independents/moderates you have to be fiscally conservative - you cannot spend with reckless abandon and you can't run historic deficits - which are both things that this DeDe woman both voted for, and what the pollsters are now telling us is what the independents/moderates dislike the most.

50 posted on 10/26/2009 9:45:16 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
..starting with the Focus on the Family mea culpa interview a couple of years ago, Newt has been trying desperately to rehabilitate his image

A horrendous ego is a difficult thing to subdue

It's time to say goodnight Newt...

51 posted on 10/26/2009 9:45:25 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Three if by government

“Newt is a fraud.”

I hate to say this because I used to really admire him but he is a fraud. I don’t know if he always was but it’s been apparent for a long time that he didn’t mean what he said. He only said it to acquire power. It’s a shame he’s a smart guy but he has no deeply held beliefs.


52 posted on 10/26/2009 9:45:29 AM PDT by Barb4Bush (God bless Glenn Beck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How about just going away Newt. You thought this would get by us and it didn’t now you’re trying to fool us with this crap.


53 posted on 10/26/2009 9:46:24 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

>> But Gingrich is defending his approach to re-building the Republican Party. It begins, he said, by accommodating those who might disagree with you.

“You Lie!”

How about accommodating those who are aligned with the tenets of Conservatism!!!


54 posted on 10/26/2009 9:47:34 AM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Barb4Bush

In 1981, Newt dumped his first wife, Jackie Battley, for Marianne, wife number 2, while Jackie was in the hospital undergoing cancer treatment. Marianne and Newt divorced in December, 1999 after Marianne found out about Newt’s long-running affair with Callista Bisek, his one-time congressional aide. Gingrich asked Marianne for the divorce by phoning her on Mother’s Day, 1999.

People that do this are lower than pond scum.


55 posted on 10/26/2009 9:48:43 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kakaze

40% of Americans classify themselves as conservative. That means you only need to convince 11% of an already right leaning populace to vote for you.


56 posted on 10/26/2009 9:50:36 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

When Newt was on C-Span the other day, he said conservatives need to realize that in some districts, there is simply no way a 100%, true-blue conservative can win. He reasoned therefore that the local GOP organizations in such districts will be wise to nominate “moderate” candidates who can actually win.

Fine. Not an unreasonable conclusion IMHO.

But Dede is clearly no moderate. She’s a flaming liberal, who appears seriously out of tune with the deeply conservative nature of her district.

I believe it will be best that the voters in NY-23 elect a Dhimmi this time, somebody who probably can easily be outsted by a revived GOP in 2010, rather than install a leftist GOP candidate like Dede who — given the powers of incumbency — might hold the seat for years.


57 posted on 10/26/2009 9:50:56 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
Newt lost me when he backed Wayne Gilchrest over Andy Harris here in MD last year. Gilchrest was one of the worst of the RINOs, voting with Dems over 90% of the time. He and Michael Steele were there for Gilchrest's GOPAC fundraiser.

The sad thing, even though that district is not as conservative as it once was, Harris barely lost and could have used extra support.

That's when I really cancelled my RNC credentials. They have quit calling..

58 posted on 10/26/2009 9:51:07 AM PDT by gramho12 (DC: we came, we saw, we ROCKED!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Newt is playing for the other team now.

He’s realized that sucking up to the bamministas can be very profitable.


59 posted on 10/26/2009 9:51:21 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Folks, we’re addressing this as if it were just Newt’s position. The truth is, this is the position of the Republican leaders both national and at the state level.

We now know why the Republican party did nothing when it was the majority party in Congress. It believed in most of the stuff the Democrats wanted to push.

By the time we were well entrenched in the Bush administration, even Great Society level programs were just the ticket.

If Newt and the party actually believe what Newt espoused here, why even go to the effort of having a Republican party? Just dissolve the party and all of you install the U.S.S.R. here and be done with it.

What a disgusting position we live in today. Nobody in D.C. is representing us. They’ve all bought off on the political tenets that cost nearly 100 million people their lives in the 20th Century.

One actually wonders who would be too far right for Newt to vote for. I’m thinking Michelle Bachmann (sp?) and Sarah Palin would scare him to death.

Reading of his statement makes me think he might vote for the ‘moderate’ Obama instead of these ‘radicals’.


60 posted on 10/26/2009 9:52:34 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson