Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Naked Justice: Arrested for Nudity in His Own Kitchen
Pajamas Media ^ | Oct. 25 | Michele Catalano

Posted on 10/25/2009 12:24:37 PM PDT by AJKauf

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-193 next last
To: goodwithagun

“Who peed in your Cherios this morning?”

Seems to me, right back at you. Don’t know why you got all hypersensitive about the other post, as if he had any “attitude”.


61 posted on 10/26/2009 7:42:22 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Oh, I know we don’t really know all the facts.

1 thing I don’t like about this thread is how everyone is going off on the woman as if she DELIBERATELY wanted to look in the windows of the place! Ludicrous.

I don’t know even general laws, but it seems to me there is a point where you reach some kind of “negligence” with what you do inside your own home - that is sensible to the outside world. Certainly it applies to noise, but what about incidental “views”? The way people talk here, apparently it’s OK to wash your car nude in the driveway by the street as long as it’s “your property”. There ARE limits. Should be very few, but there should be some.


62 posted on 10/26/2009 7:47:19 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
1 thing I don’t like about this thread is how everyone is going off on the woman as if she DELIBERATELY wanted to look in the windows of the place! Ludicrous.

Mostly they are going off on her because she is married to LE and the anti-jackbooted thugs crowd is circling. They will circle around the worst scum if there is a jackbooted thug in the story, even remotely.

63 posted on 10/26/2009 7:52:42 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
This smells to high heaven of "setup".

1) Why would a police officer be trespassing onto this man's property with her daughter?

2) Who looks IN the windows as they walk by a house? Maybe most people do, but I sure don't.

I think this woman probably knew or suspected the man liked to be nude in his home and she put together a way to get him for it.

Unless the guy was plainly visible from a public place, SHE should be the one in trouble for being a PEEPING TOM. (On private property, looking in the windows? TELL me how this would go if the sexes were reversed???)

64 posted on 10/26/2009 7:53:49 PM PDT by TChris (There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Unless the guy was plainly visible from a public place,

He was.

65 posted on 10/26/2009 8:02:52 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TChris

“1) Why would a police officer be trespassing onto this man’s property with her daughter?”

SHE wasn’t the PO, it was her husband; and it was their SON.

“2) Who looks IN the windows as they walk by a house? Maybe most people do, but I sure don’t”

Again with the assumption she deliberately looked in his windows. Ever heard of incidentally seeing inside windows? It’s not as if they were shuttered and curtained.


66 posted on 10/26/2009 8:12:39 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

I am equal opportunity.


67 posted on 10/26/2009 8:13:05 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
SHE wasn’t the PO, it was her husband; and it was their SON.

OK, guilty of a drive-by reading. But the woman was still trespassing with her son.

Again with the assumption she deliberately looked in his windows. Ever heard of incidentally seeing inside windows? It’s not as if they were shuttered and curtained.

Again, what if the sexes were reversed? The ASSUMPTION would be Peeping Tom. Why isn't the woman in trouble for trespassing and looking in the windows, whatever the reason/excuse, as any MAN would be in the same circumstances.

68 posted on 10/26/2009 11:02:57 PM PDT by TChris (There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: TChris

Yes, she’s technically trespassing, although she may have had “permission” from the owner prior.

As for your assumption we’d all assume the man was a peeping tom - ridiculous and reactionary (i.e., men are always put upon and it’s all the fault of feminazis). Same thing - he can’t help but see some stuff from exposed windows. If he openly COMPLAINED about it, as this woman did - how could he be called a “peeping tom”? Hole in the logic, there.


69 posted on 10/27/2009 6:10:58 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ellery; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
What’s not in dispute here is that the man was in his own home and the mother and kid were on his property, walking across his grass...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
(View past Libertarian pings here)
70 posted on 10/27/2009 8:07:16 AM PDT by bamahead (Avoid self-righteousness like the devil- nothing is so self-blinding. -- B.H. Liddell Hart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris

The woman’s husband is the police officer. And it was reported the authorities took action after recieving other reports of indecency


71 posted on 10/27/2009 8:14:07 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Well, the only problem is that the urinalist that took that picture forgot to get out of the customary jounalistic position (with Democrats) before shooting.


72 posted on 10/27/2009 8:44:16 AM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000
'Lady, you can't see that he's exposing himself' the officer said. 'Well, if you stand up on this stool right here, you can see everything' she said."

That's not really a joke. I had a manager in the 1980s who was refused a building permit to add a floor to his house in RPV because the proposed addition would block a bit of a neighbor's view under similar circumstances.

73 posted on 10/27/2009 8:46:44 AM PDT by altair (All I want for Christmas is NO legislation passed for the rest of the year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DH

Or gets mixed up and fries the kielbasa.


74 posted on 10/27/2009 8:47:01 AM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
1 thing I don’t like about this thread is how everyone is going off on the woman as if she DELIBERATELY wanted to look in the windows of the place! Ludicrous.

Huh?? She was on private property without permission. What right does she have to complain about something which is only illegal if done where it's publicly visible? She's fortunate if she doesn't get cited for trespassing. The fact that she's a cops wife makes it a little more egregious, I guess, but I for one would feel the same way if she weren't.

75 posted on 10/27/2009 8:55:27 AM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
I agree. Drunk or not he was in his own property and the woman was in his yard.

There was a case the first year I was in Japan of a Russian who was hungover and coming outside of his apartment naked and screaming at a child making noise in the morning. That was a totally different situation.

Whether he wears clothes or not, inside his own house isn't anyone's business but his own.

76 posted on 10/27/2009 8:59:53 AM PDT by altair (All I want for Christmas is NO legislation passed for the rest of the year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

This is ridiculous. I found more on the story and a video, too - this guy is facing a year in jail and a $2000 fine if convicted:

http://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=1790464


77 posted on 10/27/2009 10:12:45 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater; left that other site

Not a good photo. You can watch a news report interviewing the guy right here:

http://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=1790464

I believe the guy. The woman overreacted. She shouldn’t have been walking across his lawn looking in his window.


78 posted on 10/27/2009 10:16:50 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes

I believe the guy. The woman overreacted. She shouldn’t have been walking across his lawn looking in his window.

I agree.


79 posted on 10/27/2009 10:25:53 AM PDT by left that other site (Your Mi'KMaq Paddy Whacky Bass Playing Biker Buddy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

“She was on private property without permission. What right does she have to complain about something which is only illegal if done where it’s publicly visible?”

You are aware that many windows and adjacent interiors are very visible from OTHER peoples’ HOUSES, are you not? It’s not as if it all magically becomes invisible once one crosses that property line.

As for persmission - I don’t know if she had it or not (probably not written, but perhaps expressed).

In any case, it’s not as if she was a true VOYEUR.


80 posted on 10/27/2009 11:45:44 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson