Posted on 10/25/2009 12:24:37 PM PDT by AJKauf
You’re standing in your kitchen making coffee. You are naked, but no one else is home. It’s early in the morning and you are in the privacy of your own home. All right, so maybe you’re a little bit odd, and maybe not everyone makes coffee naked. But your house, your rules, right?
That’s probably what Virginia resident Eric Williamson was thinking last Monday morning as he made himself coffee while dressed in nothing but his birthday suit. Unfortunately for Williamson, he wasn’t quite as alone as he thought. Walking through his yard were a woman and her seven-year-old son, on their way to the son’s school. The woman — a wife of a police officer – saw Williamson’s naked torso through his window and called the cops. Williamson was arrested and charged with indecent exposure.
There are some disputed accounts of this story. It is unclear precisely what time of the morning it happened and whether or not the man moved to another window as the mother and child walked across the lawn in order to remain in their range of vision.What’s not in dispute here is that the man was in his own home and the mother and kid were on his property, walking across his grass.....
(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...
But you do, right?
You were the one that kept coming on to me. Now that you are losing, you want to play nice. It's simple. Just admit or deny you use the term jack-booted thugs and you were biased against the women because she was married to a jack-booted thug.
It's very straight-forward. She should be charged with trespassing, voyeurism, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Her husband should be forced to resign from the force for lack of judgment in choosing a spouse. Williamson should have all his expenses reimbursed by the local jurisdiction.
I forgot. Are you the one that called the police because you got into an argument with some guy? Heaven forbid what you might do if some naked drunk flash you and your kid and you were walking them to school.
Look, I googled for you:
I don’t know what you’re getting at. If she was on someone else’s property, maybe the legal term isn’t “trespass”. Is that what you’re getting at?
I was with my child, and he threatened to hit me. I got into my car, and he walked right up to the window screaming and saying he would hit me, and he raised his hand to hit me right through the open window.
Yeah, I’d say that’s much more serious than cutting through someone’s yard and catching a glimpse of them inside in the buff.
Translated: (I will try the old fill him with links bluff and hope he doesn't read them trick)
I looked at the first link in your first search. It does NOT use the term tresspass. Thank you. You should really read your links before you post them.
for some reason I see bongos
What did you do to provoke him? (Translated: I would really like to here his side).
I’m going to say it one more time: I don’t remember using that particular term. If it turned out that I did, I wouldn’t care if I did. I don’t know why you’re hooked on that term.
How about, "I may have used the term but now I regret it because it totally underminded my credibility."
Well, well, well... Why aren’t you just as questioning of the woman in this article?
I am not hung up on the term. I am hung up on those that use the term and post biased articles supporting their bias and the biased supporters of the jerks in these article posting that it is an important fact that she is married to a jack-booted thug but that doesn't influence their position on this issue.
It doesn’t undermine anyone’s credibility. Face it: You claimed I used some term (as if it proved something - I still don’t know what), and then you could never find a post of me using that term. So, I guess I never did.
Well, well, well ... Just admit you use the term jack-booted thugs and I will say a pleasant good night and go retire.
Close. Come on, say it! Say you have never used the term. I can smell it coming. Come on ... I am salivating over this one!
Translated: (Let's see if this lie and bluff will work).
If that is what you think, then just deny using the term. Else it is a pure, factless bluff.
I just don’t understand why you can’t understand. I don’t remember using that term. That’s all I have to say about it. It’s getting late now. Goodnight.
Translated: (I don't specifically remember where I used the term and how coldwater found out where I used the term. I googled and googled and didn't find it. How in the heck did coldwater find it so easily?)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.