1 posted on
10/20/2009 6:47:12 PM PDT by
raptor22
To: raptor22
HA good luck enforcing that with the welfare “social program” recipient crowd.
2 posted on
10/20/2009 6:49:04 PM PDT by
joesjane
(The strength of the pack is the wolf - Rudyard Kipling)
To: raptor22
My pious Catholic friend with 7 children, who actually voted for Zero, will be thrilled with this plan.
I was so appalled when I found out she voted for him. I asked her how she could vote for an abortion-loving socialist, and she said it was "because of the war...."
The irony is that's she married to a French man (they all live here now), and he was mad at her for voting for Zero because "he's a socialist." Growing up under socialism evidently makes it easy for you to spot it later!
Mrs. PoS
3 posted on
10/20/2009 6:53:35 PM PDT by
Prince of Space
(Don't use a big word when a diminutive one will do....)
To: raptor22
EXTRA CREDIT FOR ABORTED CHILDREN!
5 posted on
10/20/2009 6:59:12 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
To: raptor22
When we were in China we enjoyed watching the little children playing with their grandparents. We then realized that not only do these children not have siblings to play with, they don’t have cousins either. When you destroy the family by taking away progeny, there is no one left to take care of the elderly, except the government.
6 posted on
10/20/2009 7:00:11 PM PDT by
stayathomemom
(Beware of cat attacks while typing!)
To: raptor22
Didn't zero remove the cap on the amount of children for which welfare moms can receive money? i m a publik scewl teechur, and one of the first lessons I learned was that girls get more money if their babies have different dads. Each year we have several grandmas (you don't expect a 14 year-old to raise a baby do you?) that coach their grandchildren how to act disabled. Moms get a “crazy check”, in addition to a welfare check and Medicaid, if their babies are disabled mentally or physically.
7 posted on
10/20/2009 7:00:38 PM PDT by
goodwithagun
(My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
To: raptor22
Muslims's exempt no doubt.
Meantime; are we going to get back - ever - to what made America great; or will 'that' America be only a memory etched in history. . .
Sad, pathetic. . .challenging times.
We can save our Country if a majority has...keeps the Faith and finds the Will.
8 posted on
10/20/2009 7:00:41 PM PDT by
cricket
To: raptor22
Well, I'm glad to say our 30th grandchild was born yesterday. How's that for a carbon footprint?
To: Rurudyne; steelyourfaith; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; xcamel; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; ...
They're going to offer young couples carbon credits for only having one child.
15 posted on
10/20/2009 7:18:42 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: raptor22
Why not a one-child policy?
It worked so well in China.
And in Europe, the non-Muslims are doing their part to limit their babies and carbon footprint.
What could go wrong?
20 posted on
10/20/2009 7:30:34 PM PDT by
lurk
To: raptor22
24 posted on
10/20/2009 7:43:42 PM PDT by
TitleX
To: raptor22; potlatch
Since the ‘70’s, the environmentalists influenced two generations to limit the size of their families. For this sacrifice, our economy found it had too few workers and consumers, so the gates were opened to unlimited legal and illegal immigrants. Now that we know that the goal of the left is to destroy the U.S. from within by destroying its family structure and values, why would we fall for that again?
26 posted on
10/20/2009 7:47:00 PM PDT by
ntnychik
To: raptor22; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
29 posted on
10/20/2009 8:14:16 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Barack Hussein Obama: the country's greatest firearms salesman!)
To: raptor22
It worked so well in China.
Now they have an extra hundred million men.
31 posted on
10/20/2009 8:21:09 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Ask not what the Kennedys can do for you, but what you can do for the Kennedys.)
To: raptor22
They're going to offer young couples carbon credits for only having one child. No, there will be a tax on >1 child.
To: raptor22
And then there were none.
There are 30 million Chinese men who can’t find a women.
37 posted on
10/21/2009 5:02:50 AM PDT by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: raptor22; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; SideoutFred; ...
Carbon Cap Tax & Scam Ping ~ (POGW)
38 posted on
10/21/2009 5:29:27 AM PDT by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson