Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarkozy says no more French troops
UPI.com ^ | 16 Oct 09

Posted on 10/16/2009 7:02:34 AM PDT by xzins

UPI) -- President Nicolas Sarkozy of France says he wants to see victory in Afghanistan but has no plans to send more French troops to that country.

Speaking to the Le Figaro newspaper, the French leader said he believes there should be a build-up of more Afghan troops, CNN reported.

As for staying on in Afghanistan, Sarkozy told the newspaper: "I answer yes -- and stay to win.

"But France will not send one more soldier," he added. "My belief is that more Afghan soldiers are needed. It is them who will be the most efficient to win this war because it is their country."

About 3,070 French troops, part of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force, are in Afghanistan.

Britain announced plans this week to send an additional 500 soldiers, raising its Afghan troop strength to 9,500. The United States, which will have 68,000 troops in the country by year's end, is considering another troop surge there.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; allies; allyfrance; bhoeurope; france; frenchtroops; mcchrystal; surge; third100days
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: paul51

Oops, sorry. Forgot that France rejoined in April of this year. Mea Culpa.


21 posted on 10/16/2009 7:27:51 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: allmost

” I like their(the French) stance as of late.”

....me too, and I sure like Sarkozys as a couple a lot better than the Obamas.


22 posted on 10/16/2009 7:28:13 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Roklok
What do you expect them to do. Obama can’t be trusted. Expect to see more of this.

On the mark. Sarkozy's telling Obama to stick that Nobel where the son don't shine.

The Obama administration is really taking our allies for granted.

23 posted on 10/16/2009 7:32:36 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (If Dick Cheney = Darth Vader, then Joe Biden = Dark Helmet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
Sarkozy's telling Obama to stick that Nobel where the sun don't shine.
24 posted on 10/16/2009 7:33:38 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (If Dick Cheney = Darth Vader, then Joe Biden = Dark Helmet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Sarko isnt calling for his troops to be withdrawn either. Just saying he wont send any more.


25 posted on 10/16/2009 7:45:14 AM PDT by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: paul51

I agree France is looking out for themselves as every nation is. The US can not be considered a dependable partner any longer. Just ask the Polish. This raises the same question for fighting men and their families in this country. Would I want my son in afghan under the orders of this POTUS? Nope.


26 posted on 10/16/2009 7:45:15 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

“Afghanistan is a NATO operation. France is not part of NATO. They have troops there as a courtesy and as such I have a lot more tolerance for their decisions...As it is, he is doing what he thinks is best for France.”

HUH? France is being destroyed by Arabs...they are bleeding revenue from loss of tourism and their streets are in constant turmoil...


27 posted on 10/16/2009 7:46:08 AM PDT by jessduntno (Tell Obama to STFU - Stop The Federal Usurpation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ketelone

“Sarko isnt calling for his troops to be withdrawn either. Just saying he wont send any more.”

But WE should? He is applauded for protecting his people, but the majority of posters on this board want us to escalate. WTF???


28 posted on 10/16/2009 7:47:58 AM PDT by jessduntno (Tell Obama to STFU - Stop The Federal Usurpation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Has there been any clarity as to the goal in Afganistan? I would really like to know the direction we’re going.


29 posted on 10/16/2009 7:50:36 AM PDT by griswold3 (You think health care is expensive now? Just wait till it's FREE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Do the people of Afghanistan deserve liberty?


30 posted on 10/16/2009 7:52:05 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I think the French are realists. Perhaps I’m naive about the nuances of “war” these days, but “police actions” in areas where there is no law, and “nation building” in tribal regions with no notion of nationality seem like escapades designed for failure: even more so if our namby pamby tactics lack any hope of effectiveness.

Our CIC is throwing the fight, whatever the heck the fight is , and it is no surprise that our allies want to get out of the ring.

Layer on top of that the suicidal PC attitude the Europeans have adopted towards the immigration and demographic invasion of their sub-continent by the enemy - a case in which the term “realist” can be used only in the most cynical of manners - and I think the chances of counting on them to really fight this enemy with the ruthlessness required to win the larger “war” are nonexistent.

Europe will soon be Moslem. In essence, they have already submitted. Who there wants to go on record as the enemy of the Moslems?


31 posted on 10/16/2009 7:52:50 AM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

While I understand their lack of faith in Obama, this is still a stupid move by France.

Failure in Afghanistan means the reintroduction of terror training camps. As such, the “youth” violence in Fance would become more intense.


32 posted on 10/16/2009 7:56:12 AM PDT by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

That is a good legitimate question. I wish we had a more clear answer. The first goal was to topple the Taliban. The ultimate goal is to establish a democratic (general style, not specific) government. The inbetween goals have always been hazy at best. The Bush administration dropped the ball on this count and the Obama administration has been just as inept.

But it does seem like we are losing the first goal again. If we want to give the people of Afghanistan freedom (and we have already spent plenty of blood and treasure for that goal), then we need to figure out how to get to the end goal and do it.


33 posted on 10/16/2009 7:56:13 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Sorry, I like this pic.


34 posted on 10/16/2009 7:57:22 AM PDT by Rebelbase (This is the time of year when ACORNS fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS

the French first lady is hot, ours looks like a wookie. Staying shallow here and wanting to trade. :)


35 posted on 10/16/2009 8:07:52 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

I know the direction we Canadians are going...ALL of our troops will be out of there in 2011... leaving a few government people with the impossible job of helping to train the Afghans to look after their own bloody country.

After 8 years and over a hundred of our lads killed to say nothing of the many who are maimed for life..we are going to give the Afghans a “do it yourself kit.”


36 posted on 10/16/2009 8:10:37 AM PDT by Brit (yOU REALLY THINK T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: allmost

“the French first lady is hot,...”
...yep, and she’s been in the public eye for many years, so she knows how to appear in public...and in private!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YL0s1jhYpaY


37 posted on 10/16/2009 8:21:53 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
“France, running from a fight? Say it isn’t so!”

I don't blame Sarkozy. He sees a wishy-washy leadership position from Washington. Why would he send more of his people into a fight that the US leadership doesn't seem to have the determination to win.

38 posted on 10/16/2009 8:25:29 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

“Do the people of Afghanistan deserve liberty?”

Sure...do the people in the 80% of the world that don’t have it deserve it? Sure. Go get ‘em Tiger...


39 posted on 10/16/2009 8:25:41 AM PDT by jessduntno (Tell Obama to STFU - Stop The Federal Usurpation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: xzins

He won’t even send his son to help out? awwww

The FRench Foreign Legion used to fight well.

shame, what a waste of all that talent and energy


40 posted on 10/16/2009 8:25:48 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson