Posted on 10/15/2009 1:39:07 PM PDT by gaijin
In its pages, Omar (and his mother) reveal that the Clinton administration failed in a major assassination attempt of Osama bin Laden, just days after the 1998 East Africa embassy bombings. This is something that has often been speculated but never confirmed. Former insiders like Richard Clarke say Omar bin Ladens account of the assassination failure appears to be credible. And if this is the case, it might explain a little more about what documents Sandy Berger really had stashed away.
“The Party In My Pants: My Life”
by Sandra Murgatroyd Berger
that the bush administration let Berger skate was abominable. Just another example of those that view themselves as our rulers giving a pass to a fellow insider rather than let Americans learn the truth.
Barney is jealous!
They should ask Michael Moore —”Omar Bin Laden says Clinton bungled a hit against OSama; what are the chances this enraged him, provoking him to attack the USA...?”
I don’t blame Clinton for trying —I think it’s great.
But this is a fair turn-around question.
So we have to read an entire column reviewing the Sandy Burgler case and get a single paragraph on what he might have been hiding?
No we don’t, and you don’t either —that’s why I chose to post that one paragraph; to save you time.
For YEARS this was an item of very deep speculation, and the implications of the content of those docs is pretty far-reaching.
Right, you did us right, but I foolishly thought their might be more there.
In its pages, Omar (and his mother) reveal that the Clinton administration failed in a major assassination attempt of Osama bin Laden, just days after the 1998 East Africa embassy bombings. This is something that has often been speculated but never confirmed. Former insiders like Richard Clarke say Omar bin Laden's account of the assassination failure appears to be credible. And if this is the case, it might explain a little more about what documents Sandy Berger really had stashed away.
Deb wrote: “Media Rosebud, Richard Clarke, also said in front of the 9/11 Committee that the Clinton administration bombed the “aspirin factory” in Sudan hoping to kill al Qaeda’s chief bomb-maker, BUT HE WAS IN IRAQ MEETING WITH SADDAM HUSSEIN!”
..... But, but, but, but this cannot possibly be! We’ve been assured repeatedly that there was absolutely no connection beetween Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda. Obviously, Richard Clarke’s brain somehow must have been under the control of Don Rumsfeld when he was testifying.
That’s the only possible explanation.
Osama & Obama : both wage war on America but only one was given a Nobel Prize for doing it.
Putting together information to document the truth — and slam the “Truthers” (Re-Victimizers):
http://www.911Reality.com
See all the confessions by Al Qaeda on the frnot page
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.