Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Land Fines Orly Taitz $20K, File Copy of Order with State Bar of CA
United States District Court (Georgia) ^ | 10/13/2009 | Judge Clay Land

Posted on 10/13/2009 7:45:31 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan

When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice.

-snip-

Regrettably, the conduct of counsel Orly Taitz has crossed these lines, and Ms. Taitz must be sanctioned for her misconduct. After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsel’s conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsel’s response to the Court’s show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court. Payment shall be made to the United States, through the Middle District of Georgia Clerk’s Office, within thirty days of today’s Order. If counsel fails to pay the sanction due, the U.S. Attorney will be authorized to commence collection proceedings.

(Full Order at the link.)


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: afterbirthers; afterbirtherwave; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; civilprocedure; eligibility; judgeland; orlytaitz; truthers; vetters; vetting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,1601,161-1,165 next last
To: Vendome

“Dang it. I wuz gonna be right.”

Ya gotta be more like me. I’m always right!

That’s because I’m never left, except when left behind the 8 ball, (with O, that’s happening more and more these days).

I do admit that on rare occasions, I have been wrong (but that’s because I thought I was wrong, but I was actually right).

Dagnabit, now ya got me wondering if I’m in my right mind, so I’ll just have to stop now so as to preserve whatever part of my mind I have left.

(Hmmm, that didn’t sound right, but it has to be ‘cause I’m never left, right?)


1,141 posted on 10/14/2009 10:58:48 PM PDT by RebelTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1140 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
That is why John McCain, born in the Colon Hospital in Colon, Panama would also have been constitutionally eligible to be president.

Doesn't matter where he was born, because there is an exception, in both Vattel and Blackstone for children of diplomats and those in the service of the country.

But, he wasn't born in the hospital in Colon, he was born in the family hospital on the Coco Solo Naval base. It was in the local English Language newspaper. It's what his mother claims. It's what birth certificate he showed to a Washington Times reporter, indicated. The reporter chekced on the docotr's name and found that he was indeed stationed at Coco Solo in 1936.

1,142 posted on 10/14/2009 10:59:23 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1138 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
The Constitution provides no legal guidance on defining “native born citizen”

Not surprising, since the term appears nowhere in that document. Of course few "terms of art" are defined in the Constitution. You are supposed to be educated enough to know what they mean. In 1787, people did.

1,143 posted on 10/14/2009 11:05:06 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1138 | View Replies]

To: RebelTex

You may want to lay off the shots for tonight and save your strength for the weekend. LOL


1,144 posted on 10/14/2009 11:11:11 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1141 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

LOL


1,145 posted on 10/14/2009 11:16:17 PM PDT by RebelTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1144 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

The Constitution provides no legal guidance on defining “native born citizen”
Not surprising, since the term appears nowhere in that document. Of course few “terms of art” are defined in the Constitution. You are supposed to be educated enough to know what they mean. In 1787, people did.


Yes, I’m reasonably certain that knowing what the “terms of art” mean is why Barack Obama was sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts, had his Electoral College votes certified without challenge by 535 members of Congress and that is why to date all Obama eligibility cases have been denied by the Supreme Court without comment.
Thus far, 50 lawsuits have been denied or dismissed concerning Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president. No lawsuits have ruled for plaintiffs and 8 cases are on appeal or awaiting additional hearings.
Oh, and the Constitution wasn’t ratified until June 21, 1788.


1,146 posted on 10/15/2009 8:33:59 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1143 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Barack Obama was sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts, had his Electoral College votes certified without challenge by 535 members of Congress

Whatever. None of that makes someone not eligible suddenly eligible.

Oh, and the Constitution wasn’t ratified until June 21, 1788.

But the ratification period started in 1787. Your point is?

1,147 posted on 10/15/2009 9:09:01 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1146 | View Replies]

To: Eaker; humblegunner; Vendome
Question is, did you ever hit the can?

I believe the term is "Kick the Can" a popular game plaid under the new street lights, of which there were few. CHS Class of 56

1,148 posted on 10/15/2009 9:31:04 AM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Barack Obama was sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts, had his Electoral College votes certified without challenge by 535 members of Congress
Whatever. None of that makes someone not eligible suddenly eligible.

Oh, and the Constitution wasn’t ratified until June 21, 1788.

But the ratification period started in 1787. Your point is?


Obama is eligible because he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii at 7:24pm on Friday, August 4, 1961. His birth was registered with the state of Hawaii on August 8, 1961 which makes him old enough and Natural Born.
The state of Hawaii has verified the Obama birth information that is required to be president under the constitution.
Anyone who doesn’t want Barack Obama to be president should vote against him on the first Tuesday of November, 2012.
That’s my point.


1,149 posted on 10/15/2009 9:33:49 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1147 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot; Eaker; humblegunner

What are you talking about? He totally wasted a beer with a lead slug!

Kick that! /s lol

(CHS Class of 56?)


1,150 posted on 10/15/2009 9:39:26 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1148 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Others say it’s genuine.

Especially you and your groupies, and your opinion amounts to squat.

The fact remains we know less about this man than any other man in History, except maybe the Unknown Soldiers buried around the world.

Strangely Court sealed records of his opponents for office, all found their way into the media, despite being sealed.

Obama's stuff, however, remains sealed, guess he had better lawyers, or just maybe a few crooked judges, helped him out, like the ones that are aiding and abetting him now.

1,151 posted on 10/15/2009 9:41:34 AM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Try proving your specious assertions with Hawaiian documentation. Orly has filed a Kenyan copy with sworn affidavit, in Carter’s Court, and your obamessiah has filed nothing as proof. ... We already know you want to claim the fraudulent Internet images are proof, and we know they are empty obamanoid bluster.


1,152 posted on 10/15/2009 9:41:39 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1149 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Especially you and your groupies, and your opinion amounts to squat.

As do your's. Or haven't you noticed that yet?

Obama's stuff, however, remains sealed, guess he had better lawyers, or just maybe a few crooked judges, helped him out, like the ones that are aiding and abetting him now.

Obama doesn't need crooked judges when he's up against Orly Taitz.

1,153 posted on 10/15/2009 9:43:48 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1151 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Orly has filed a Kenyan copy with sworn affidavit, in Carter’s Court, and your obamessiah has filed nothing as proof. ...

At this stage he's not required to. Though it'd be worth it to let the case go forward just to find out if that Kenyan birth certificate is as phony as her earlier one was.

We already know you want to claim the fraudulent Internet images are proof, and we know they are empty obamanoid bluster.

Becuase you keep telling us they are?

1,154 posted on 10/15/2009 9:54:06 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1152 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Try proving your specious assertions with Hawaiian documentation. Orly has filed a Kenyan copy with sworn affidavit, in Carter’s Court, and your obamessiah has filed nothing as proof. ... We already know you want to claim the fraudulent Internet images are proof, and we know they are empty obamanoid bluster.


I wish Dr. Taitz the best of luck with her filing before Judge Carter. I say let the legal chips fall where they may.


1,155 posted on 10/15/2009 11:11:52 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1152 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
The state of Hawaii has verified the Obama birth information that is required to be president under the constitution

They have stated that the documents they have on file say he was born in Hawaii. They have not verified his residence or age. Nor have they verified his father's citizenship at the time of his birth.

1,156 posted on 10/15/2009 11:18:50 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1149 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Obama doesn't need crooked judges when he's up against Orly Taitz.

Maybe he doesn't, but he sure has them, can't say the same for our side.

You Non-Answeres are getting old, so either answer, or don't bother.

1,157 posted on 10/15/2009 12:37:55 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1153 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
You Non-Answeres are getting old, so either answer, or don't bother.

As are your asinine accusations made without any evidence to support them. Judges are not crooked merely because you disagree with their verdicts. Based on what I've seen on your posts I'd say disagreeing with you is more an indication of their competence and intelligence.

1,158 posted on 10/15/2009 1:30:12 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1157 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
That is why John McCain, born in the Colon Hospital in Colon, Panama would also have been constitutionally eligible to be president.

Ugh. This is another one of those internet myths that never dies.

McCain wasn't born in the Colon hospital. He was born in the the Coco Solo naval hospital within the US Canal zone. The BC floating around on the internet claiming he was born in the Colon hospital is a fake. It was subsmitted into evidence by a guy challanging his McCain's eligibility in a case that was dismissed.

You can read about it all here:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/05/citizen_mccain.html

1,159 posted on 10/15/2009 1:31:44 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1138 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Orly has filed a Kenyan copy with sworn affidavit,

...which is inadmissible in evidence under Rule 902 (3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

1,160 posted on 10/15/2009 2:40:21 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,1601,161-1,165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson