Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/29/2009 7:39:20 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cycle of discernment; LucyT; Beckwith; Fred Nerks

If discovery is ordered we still have to vault the pleading of Presidential Executive Privilege as a defence to discovery. That will take some time to work through.

Kudos to Orly!!!


2 posted on 09/29/2009 7:44:40 AM PDT by Candor7 (The effective weapons against Fascism are ridicule, derision, and truth (Member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

“This simply means that he is going to hear this case and order discovery immediately.”

Who comes up with this crap? That is not what the order means.


3 posted on 09/29/2009 7:47:26 AM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”


4 posted on 09/29/2009 7:47:33 AM PDT by Dryman ("FREE THE LONG FORM!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
Here's a post from last evening with several comments if anyone is interested in reading them.

KEYES v OBAMA-76-MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: REQUEST FOR LEAVE OF COURT ^

6 posted on 09/29/2009 7:54:35 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
Will [Pelosi] be the first to resign or be impeached if it turns out that Mr. Obama was in fact not eligible to occupy that post?

Resign? Never. Impeached? By whom? The liberal 'Rat Congress? HA!

9 posted on 09/29/2009 8:10:37 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
I hope people are taking precautions...they're playing for REAL.
13 posted on 09/29/2009 8:56:44 AM PDT by Nephi ( Bush legacy: "I had to sacrifice free market principles to save the free market.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

Recall that Clinton had the chutzpah to raise the Soldiers & Sailors Relief Act:
http://cgi.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/news/9605/28/clinton.jones/
an act that was designed to protect members of our armed forces from suits filed while they were overseas.

Like greater apes, Democrats (e.g. Begala, `Serpenthead’, Rahm, Soetero, Pelosi, Reid and all the other usual suspects) will throw their own skat against the wall if they think it would stick.


14 posted on 09/29/2009 8:59:55 AM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

“This simply means that he is going to hear this case and order discovery immediately.” Um, no, that is not what this means. He may or may not hear this case on the merits. What this means is, Judge Carter has granted Taitz the opportunity to submit surreply not to exceed ten pages. That is all this means. He may even grant the defendants the opportunity to surreply when Orly’s surreply is in, but that is not yet clear either.


18 posted on 09/29/2009 9:37:22 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
Judge Carter had granted my motion for surreply. I can provide 10 more pages of argument and all the necessary attachments by October 1st.

This means nothing. The judge is letting her respond to the reply brief filed by the moving party, Obama's lawyers. It could be that the judge wants to make sure she can't complain that she didn't get to make all her arguments when he slams her.

19 posted on 09/29/2009 10:05:07 AM PDT by Defiant (Hey socialists-- We're right, we fight, get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
This simply means that he is going to hear this case and order discovery immediately.

This simply means nothing of the sort. The judge is allowing Tatitz to file one more reply before ruling on the defense motion to dismiss.

21 posted on 09/29/2009 10:07:12 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

The executive Orders ONLY cover the documents that he generates as President. It in NO WAY covers anything generated before that time, and that Executive order ONLY covers Federal Documents.

So, The Executive Order is utterly irrelevant.

HAHA!


23 posted on 09/29/2009 10:09:50 AM PDT by Danae (No political party should pick candidates. That's the voters job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

It is pathetic that she is making a big deal out of these “victories.” There is almost no circumstance under which such motions would NOT be granted.

I haven’t followed these cases at all, but this makes her sound like a complete flake.


29 posted on 09/29/2009 10:43:51 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

15 Days!


35 posted on 09/29/2009 11:15:58 AM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

obumpa


39 posted on 09/29/2009 9:46:16 PM PDT by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson