Mine this.
Posted on 09/28/2009 2:08:30 PM PDT by Coleus
Recently declassified documents obtained by Wired magazine reveal a massive Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) data mining operation. It already possesses over 1.5 billion records from government and private-sector sources. That figure is expected by the FBI to balloon to over 6 billion within a few years. And it is not just terrorists they are after. According to the documents, the National Security Branch Analysis Center (NSAC) is being used to pursue multiple types of non-terrorism domestic investigations. It is also meant to be able to sort through the data — everything from health and travel records to credit card transactions and car rentals — to identify people who might pose a threat. The “pattern analysis” capabilities search for suspicious behavior to finger people of interest, but the whole concept has been hammered by critics as a sort of unconstitutional “pre-crime” program.
The effort is similar in some respects to the Department of Defense’s controversial Total Information Awareness program that was supposed to be essentially shut down by Congress. But far from disappearing, the program appears to have simply been moved. Now the FBI wants to quadruple the size of the NSAC’s “known” staff, according to the Wired article about the system, entitled ‘Newly Declassified Files Detail Massive FBI Data-Mining Project.’ In 2008, it already had over 100 full time employees and contractors. “We have a situation where the government is spending fairly large sums of money to use an unproven technology that has a possibility of false positives that would subject innocent Americans to unnecessary scrutiny and impinge on their freedom,” explained Kurt Opsahl, an attorney for the privacy watchdog Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). “Before the NSAC expands its mission, there must be strict oversight from Congress and the public.”
Opsahl also cited a 2008 study by the National Research Council that said these types of operations are a dangerous and ineffective way of identifying potential terrorists. The paper highlighted poor data quality, the inevitability of false positives, privacy concerns and the preliminary nature of the concepts involved. It concluded that “automated identification of terrorists through data mining or any other mechanism is neither feasible as an objective nor desirable as a goal of technology development efforts.” The EFF produced a damning report about the biggest component of the FBI’s program — the Investigative Data Warehouse, which the bureau claims is its “single largest repository of operational and intelligence information.” The database contains a wide variety of information including telephone records and even some biometric data. The EFF report also reveals that an employee in the FBI’s Office of General Counsel recommended “against raising congressional consciousness levels and expectations” about the privacy implications of the system.
“The IDW objective was to create a data warehouse that uses certain data elements to provide a single-access repository for information related to issues beyond counterterrorism to include counterintelligence, criminal and cyber investigations,” according to a formerly secret 2008 budget request cited by Wired. “These missions will be refined and expanded as these capabilities are folded into the NSAC.” So how did the FBI get all of the data? Nobody really knows, except the data miners themselves, perhaps. Some of it was handed over voluntarily by companies, some is from the government itself and other parts came from the use of provisions in the “Patriot” Act. The FBI would not comment, nor would many of the companies involved. A report ordered by Republican U.S. Representative Jim Sensebrenner about how the data would be used and how the FBI was safe-guarding the information has not been made public.
Another stunning revelation of the program is that the FBI had been sharing NSAC information with one of the Department of Defense’s domestic spying units, the office of Counter-Intelligence Field Activity. The secretive program was caught gathering information about American anti-war groups and even the Quakers. The FBI has since told Congress that they will be more careful. NSAC data was also used in the prosecution of a telemarketing company, and is supposedly being used against hackers and a wide variety of common criminals. Recent revelations from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts show that out of 763 so-called “sneak-and-peak” requests under the Patriot Act, only three were in any way related to terrorism. The majority were drug cases.
Now the FBI has produced a “wish list” of more information it wants for the operation. On the list were databases from the Airlines Reporting Corporation, which has billions of American travel itineraries, credit card information and a myriad of other private data. Also included were the national social security database, Postal Service databases, and more. The documents provided to Wired contained an additional 24 databases that were blacked out.
Americans already know who the government is looking for — so-called “right-wing extremists” concerned about issues like U.S. sovereignty, the shredding of the Constitution, abortion, and even illegal immigration. The Department of Homeland Security made that abundantly clear when it called them the “most dangerous” threat to national security in the infamous report that turned out to have been sourced largely to discredited political groups like the leftist Southern Poverty Law Center and a website with dragons, unicorns, and tarot cards across the top.
Congress should thoroughly investigate the program and hold responsible parties accountable. Americans have a right to be secure from such invasive tactics unless a warrant is issued by a judge based on a specific criteria. The time has come to dismantle the police state and restore the rule of law under the U.S. Constitution. Alex Newman is an American freelance writer and the president of Liberty Sentinel Media, Inc., a small media consulting firm. He is currently living in Sweden and has spent most of his life in Latin America, Europe and Africa. He has a degree in foreign languages and speaks Spanish, French, Portuguese, German, Italian and a little Swedish and Afrikaans. In addition, he earned a degree in journalism from the University of Florida, with emphasis on economics and international relations.
So after reading the article about the innocent womans
comment, did she go to jail?...I’m sure she didn’t. They
or she would have to prove otherwise. I still think
it’s the evil ones who would be running scared. They
are more afaid of the latest and greatest technical
things being done, because they know the chances of them
getting caught is greater. If I was a bad person, I’d
be real afraid of this technology...
Really darling....
I see you are a member of Free Republic...
Couldn't have said it better. I welcome being on their list, I hate FUBO and hope Biden becomes president soon!! Mine that FBI !!!
Occupation is what is happening right now.
Mine this.
So, remind me again why it is impossible for the FBI to find and track over 20 million illegal aliens in this country? >>>
great point.
It took a thousand fat federal clowns five years running around in circles to capture Eric Rudolph, the Olympic bomber. And he wasn’t hiding. These morons would get lost in a telephone booth. If TSHF, these boys will be hiding in DC doughnut shops, if they can find them.
I think the FBI should take a long hard look at ACORN - and a few of the other criminal liberal organizations.
Yep. As my tagline says, I have 4 reasons for the administration to label me as an extremist: I am an Army Veteran, I attended a protest and meetings pertaining to the Second ammendment, I own guns, and I am a white heterosexual male who clings to religion. Shoot I could come up with a whole lot more.
ruby ridge and waco, don’t ever home school your children or want to be left alone.
Aw, c’mon, you know the neocons and statists will love this sort of thing, especially if it enables to them to make “pre-emptive” hits on U.S. citizens that threaten the public interest (or other individuals and organizations), or even are a “perceived” threat, before they can actually commit their vicious crimes.
We’ll all be safe then, won’t we?
and why doesn’t the FBI track illegal foreign campaign donations to Obummer’s 08 campaign?
rule #2 Gauss curve is your friend.
Further explanation, please?
Oh come on - after the FBI wades through ACORN members ripping off the government and teaching the underclass how to do violence to our country by scamming tax dollars, after they wade through the leftist violent protesters ( while totally ignoring those groups because ACORN criminals and leftist nuts are PC) - they get to their REAL target - some conservative middle class person attending a tea party or a Methodist Church...
Uncover LARGE SCALE crime???
Skip the FBI and the MSM with their thousands of agents and "journalists" and instead turn to a 25 year old kid called O'Keefe and his 20 year old sidekick, Hannah.
Maybe O'Keefe can get around to tracking illegal foreign campaign donations next...
Obama didn;t do this- Bush did.
No they will not make things up. There is no need to!
There are so many laws on the books now, many working at cross purposes, that if they really want to nab you, they will. They can. Sometimes, they do.
That’s just the way it is.
CA....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.