Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Agenda 21, Secular Humanism, and the Animalization of Americans
Conservative Underground ^ | 15-Sep-2009 | Linda Kimball

Posted on 09/18/2009 9:22:24 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

The murderous secular humanist religions of Communism and Nazism were spawned by the anti-God/utopian tradition of Revolutionary France. The Black Book of Communism, an 800- page compendium of the crimes of Communist regimes worldwide, graphically details the terror, torture, man-made famine, mass deportations, starvation, and massacres undertaken on behalf of revolutionary utopian ideals. The reality of Communism, which claimed to be an emissary of the Enlightenment, of universal brotherhood, and of happiness for all as envisioned by Gracchus Babeuf, turned out to be not only a sadistic engine for unimaginable evil but also the creator of hells on earth.

The book’s authors point to Communism’s “biological and zoological strain of thinking” as the engine of evil that proved itself to be a most effective means of denying the humanity of Communism’s millions of victims. “This strain of thinking,” explained Stephane Courtois, “is why so many of the crimes of Communism were crimes against humanity, and how Marxist-Leninist ideology managed to justify these crimes to its followers.” (The Black Book of Communism, p. 751)

Biocentrism: the Biological/Zoological Strain of Thinking

Biocentrism or ecocentrism, terms synonymous with today’s sustainable development/global warming crowd, is the “biological and zoological strain of thinking” in disguise. Biocentrism is antithetical to America ’s Judeo-Christian worldview in that it not only reduces man to a soulless ape, but makes his life less valuable than cockroaches, earthworms, spotted owls, trash fish, grizzlies, alligators, and wolves. Those who trace the genesis of ideas, such as Donald Worster, point to Charles Darwin as the most important spokesman for the biocentrism attitude. In short, Darwin ’s theory of evolution, the malignant heart of biocentrism, leads to contempt and even hatred towards humanity.

“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.” (Earth First! Journal editor, John Daily)

“To feed a starving child is to exacerbate the world population problem.” (Yale professor Lamont Cole)

Biocentrism and its morally-warped system of philosophy and morality thrive right here in America . Communism (multiculturalism/ Cultural Marxism) and its diabolical mother, Secular Humanism, plus its twisted sisters, Postmodernism and Cosmic Humanism (New Age global warming crowd) are now the predominant way of thinking in most of America’s power centers. At the heart of each of these systems beats the black heart of Darwinian biocentrism.

Dr. James Dobson notes, “The Secular Humanist system....has outstripped Judeo- Christian precepts in the universities.... judiciary.... federal bureaucracy, in business, medicine, law, psychology, sociology....arts, in many public schools, and to be sure, in the halls of Congress.” (Understanding the Times, David A. Noebel, p. 7)

Every day in our public schools, America’s children are “animalized” through the teaching of Darwinian evolutionary propaganda. Though some are able to resist this dehumanizing spiritual attack, many more are not. Of those who cannot, some will go on to join the ranks of anti-God, anti-America, anti-human revolutionaries, thereby becoming accomplices in the destruction of the nation that nourishes and protects them. Others will become practical atheists who, having no faith in God, will not fight for a nation founded on Judeo-Christian precepts. From a secular humanist point of view, these are desired outcomes because:

“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States.” (Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund)

These things are occurring because for nearly two centuries Secular Humanists and revolutionary fellow travelers - having infiltrated and taken control of this nation’s education establishment - incrementally replaced our nation’s founding Judeo-Christian moral and philosophical worldview and history with a revolutionary catechism. The effect of this has been to not only undermine and delegitimize our nation’s traditional ideas and institutions but to also reverse and upend the natural order, all of which is leading to the destruction of our civilization.

“To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.” (Alexander Solzhenitsyn)

Teaching to this nation’s future leaders, jurists, lawmakers, government workers, teachers, etc., the ideas and philosophies of men and women such as Comte, Marx, Malthus, de Sade, Rousseau, Reich, Freud, Darwin, Nietzsche, Lenin, Stalin, Heidegger, Adorno, Lukacs, Gramsci, Sanger, Marcuse, Dewey, Kinsey, Derrida, and Foucault, for example, has unleashed a devastating wave of corruption, debauchery, political correctness, chaos, pathologies, crime, narcissism, raw powergrabbing, and abandonment of allegiance towards these United States of America, all of which paves the way for the rise of a socialistic, sustainably developed New World Order.

An alternative power structure necessary for deconstructing our Constitutional Republic has been created. This “shadow government” of interlocking relationships and mutually reinforcing agendas consists of, for example, the New Left, the Democratic machine, environmental organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, Audubon Society, and The Wildlife Federation; big money foundations, such as Heinz, Mott, Blue Moon, Turner, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund; federal and state fish and wildlife departments, and of course, the United Nations. In hot pursuit of their North American Union project, the power and money hungry Transnational Right aids and abets the destructive process.

With the exception of the dissident voices of “intolerant, racist/haters” like Christians and other true Conservatives, the majority of Americans have passively acquiesced to being told that they are mindless, soulless apes. They also allow their children to be animalized and even told that as apes, they share a common heritage with earthworms. In light of this, the following question bears asking: Why should anyone, let alone the narcissists who are busily deconstructing our nation, respect and serve such a people?

If Antonio Gramsci were alive, he would be gratified by how well his plan for the slow and gradual destruction of America from the inside is working.

Agenda 21: The Utopian Fantasy

Agenda 21 was adopted at the 1992 UN Conference in Rio de Janeiro. This 300-page document contains 40 chapters loaded with recommendations to micro-manage virtually every facet of human existence. Agenda 21 is not a treaty but a “soft-law” policy document that does not require Senate ratification. Some of the key players involved in its production and adoption are Al Gore, Ted Turner, and Maurice Strong. President George H.W. Bush signed it and President Clinton issued Executive Order No. 12852, which created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development.

In his, “Sustainable Development: Transforming America,” Henry Lamb provides us with a vignette of the emerging utopia. Speaking only of America, he says:

“Half the land area of the entire country will be designated ‘wilderness areas’ where only wildlife managers and researchers will be allowed. These areas will be interconnected by ‘corridors of wilderness’ to allow migration of wildlife… Wolves will be as plentiful in Virginia and Pennsylvania as they are now in Idaho and Montana . Panthers and alligators will roam freely from the Everglades to the Okefenokee and beyond.... Transportation between sustainable communities (islands of human habitation)....will be primarily by light rail systems....highways that remain will be super transport corridors, such as the “Trans- Texas Corridor” now being designed....” (Ecologic Special Report, Dec. 1, 2005)

Property Acquisition Schemes

“The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If “Thou shalt not covet,” and “Thou shalt not steal,” were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society, before it can be civilized or made free.”(John Adams, The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, Charles Francis Adams, Ed., Vol. VI, p.9)

The Wildlands Project, written by Dr. Reed Noss, who is under contract with The Nature Conservancy, is one such scheme. It has never been debated or voted on by elected officials. Nevertheless, it is being implemented through backdoor initiatives. Through its use thus far, 106.5 million acres have been acquired by being designated as wilderness since 1964.

Henry Lamb reports that not only is eminent domain a key “land-taking” strategy but:

“In the West, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management are driving ranchers off the land by reducing grazing allotments…people who have recreational cabins on federal land, are discovering that their permits are not being renewed. The Fish and Wildlife Service is forcing people off their land through designations of “wetlands,” and “critical habitat”....” (Lamb, op. cit.)

The biocentric Endangered Species Act makes use of spotted owls, plants, trash fish, alligators, grizzlies, wolves, and more to run people off their land. Within the space of one week in 2006, three young Florida women were attacked by so-called “managed” alligators. All three women died gruesome deaths. “Managed” wolves are likewise useful for terrorizing landowners, especially when said owners have been criminally deprived of the basic right of self defense.

An article entitled, “Wolf Management Program Actions Show Children are Expendable,” in the Wolfcrossing blog speaks of the outrage, despair, and sense of helplessness felt by landowners handcuffed by politically correct Department of Fish and Wildlife regulations that elevate the welfare of wolves over that of people, thus leaving them helpless in the face of marauding wolves.

Sister Flash writes, “Recently a little boy was encircled by Mexican wolves....the Luna pack circled him for more than five minutes.” One month later, wrote Sister Flash, the pack attacked a family dog as it followed its 8-year old owner (a girl) who was going to feed the family's horses. Thirty days later, “the (same) little girl’s beautiful black quarter horse (Six) was trapped in his corral and brutally slaughtered by the same wolves.... (More recently) a small dog named Maggie was attacked protecting her child’s play yard, right off the front porch....” (http://wolfcrossing.org/blog/? p=235)

Not only have the wolves not been removed, but the notorious alpha male - who had been relocated from Arizona to New Mexico for hanging around a schoolyard in Blue, AZ - has been declared “no longer a threat,” by the complicit New Mexico Department of Game and Fish.

“In the beginning, God created....” is the core presupposition on which Western civilization advanced for more than two millennia. Its highest expression is in our Declaration of Independence, where it serves as the ultimate source of our unalienable rights. This presupposition is condemned by most western policy makers and by the UN, all of whom prefer the biocentric view:

“Human happiness, and....fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet....until such time as homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.” (David Graber, research biologist with the National Park Service)

“....Christianity (has set) humans apart from nature (and) converted the world into a warehouse of commodities for human enjoyment.” (Global Biodiversity Assessment, p. 787)

In a chilling portent of things to come, M. Macnab, a respondent to the Wolfcrossing article, spoke to all Americans when she warned:

“We here in ‘wolf recovery territory’ know all to well what horrible encroachments on our rights can occur when state and federal officials violate their true purpose. Life without basic rights to protecting one’s family and property is not at all pleasant and this careless and lawless disregard for others welfare will, if not checked…become the standard for all.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 1992; agenda21; babeuf; blackbookofcommunism; csd; econuts; eminentdomain; gracchusbabeuf; henrylamb; mauricestrong; moralabsolutes; natureconservancy; northamericanunion; strong; un; wildlandsproject
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 701-702 next last
To: wagglebee

Problem with your list, as has been addressed earlier on this thread, the ones I posted are some of the last comments the Founding Fathers made, on this subject. See the quotations again. Explain why they would have made such comments.


141 posted on 09/19/2009 4:39:10 PM PDT by OldSpice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Lewis has a way of cutting to the chase. He had one of the clearest minds around.


142 posted on 09/19/2009 4:39:28 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice
Self interest? The desire to manipulate the truth? An agenda that involves the destruction of Christianity?
143 posted on 09/19/2009 4:40:00 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Pinging the owner of the site, and then making name-calls of “trolling” would be a threat now, wouldn’t it?

Why don’t you simply refute my arguments by explaining why the Founding Fathers said what they did, in private letters, no less?!


144 posted on 09/19/2009 4:41:27 PM PDT by OldSpice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: trisham

The quotations? I don’t think so. Why did the Founding Fathers make those statements? That would answer a lot.


145 posted on 09/19/2009 4:42:14 PM PDT by OldSpice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Muslims believe in murdering and executing infidels because they are really convinced they are serving their false god.

Why were “witches” burnt?


146 posted on 09/19/2009 4:44:18 PM PDT by OldSpice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother; OldSpice; narses; betty boop; trisham
The victims of religious persecution (often simply political murder given a veneer of religion: see, e.g., Henry VIII) pale in comparison to the victims of 20th century atheist regimes.

Excellent point!

Here's what atheism gets us:

Rachel Carson (author of "Silent Spring" which resulted in the DDT ban): 50-80 MILLION deaths and rising every year.

Margaret Sanger: 46 MILLION deaths worldwide EVERY YEAR (850 MILLION to 1.2 BILLION worldwide since 1900).

Stalin: 13 MILLION+ deaths.

Hitler: 12 MILLION+ deaths

Mao: 50-80 MILLION deaths

So, in just the last century, atheism is responsible for the deaths of AT LEAST 975 MILLION INNOCENT people. (And note that this only counts the genocide that can be directly attributed to them, if the wars initiated by Stalin, Mao and Hitler were included there would be close to 100 MILLION more.)


147 posted on 09/19/2009 4:44:29 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice
Perhaps you can channel the minds of the founding fathers. Did I say “perhaps”? I should have said that you seem to think that you can channel the minds of the founding fathers.
148 posted on 09/19/2009 4:46:49 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice; metmom; trisham; narses
Pinging the owner of the site, and then making name-calls of “trolling” would be a threat now, wouldn’t it?

If I saw a burglar breaking into my neighbor's house and called my neighbor at work right after I called the police and made sure my gun was loaded would that be a "threat".

149 posted on 09/19/2009 4:47:01 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“A man’s ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.”

— Albert Einstein, “Religion and Science,” New York Times Magazine, 9 November 1930.


150 posted on 09/19/2009 4:48:03 PM PDT by OldSpice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice
Last in time is not necessarily 'the last word', by any means. It is more fruitful to consider both public and private statements, as well as a man's actions in the public arena, for an accurate overall picture.

Private correspondence among intimate friends, especially in those days when people set aside many hours in the day to write letters, contained speculation, hyperbole, and much nonsense. One must also consider the recipient and the reason for which the letter was written -- for example, Jefferson's personal letter to the Danbury Baptists, intended to assuage their concern about the possibility of an Established Church, has been distorted by the secularists into a constitutional principle. And particularly in the case of Jefferson, his political enemies made a great deal of hay over his supposed 'atheism' and even have attributed to him things he never said.

People have actually taken one sentence from a letter of John Randolph of Roanoke as 'proof' that he was a Muslim! No such thing, of course, he was just blowing off steam. He was a lifelong grouch, loved to pick a fight, and aggravated the heck out of everyone he encountered. His will was eventually broken on the grounds of insanity, to boot.

151 posted on 09/19/2009 4:48:09 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: narses

This is a conservative Christian site and we have JimRob’s words to back that up: “We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced ATHEISM, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.”

Atheists, anti-Semites, Anti-Christian skeptics and such are in the wrong place.


152 posted on 09/19/2009 4:48:48 PM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice

Are you worried about something you posted? Do you regret it? Would you prefer that the owner of this site not know your opinions on this issue?


153 posted on 09/19/2009 4:49:45 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: narses

Don’t waste your time if you think a liberal troll is on your case...tell them not to post to you anymore and inform the mods.


154 posted on 09/19/2009 4:50:03 PM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The only problem is that I was making arguments, posting legitimate, authentic, verifiable and cited quotations, on a subject that is directly linked to the contents of the main article in the thread, and getting threats in return.

That’s a far cry from burglarising, wouldn’t you agree?

________________________________________________________

That said, I’m glad that at least you saw those replies to me as threats.


155 posted on 09/19/2009 4:50:47 PM PDT by OldSpice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Thanks for the ping. Will read up as soon as I deal with 50# of peaches that just walked in the door. When you find out OldSpice’s previous screen name let me know!


156 posted on 09/19/2009 4:51:58 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: trisham

No, most certainly not!

I was merely amused at the futility of the person concerned, that she or he had to resort to that. I was merely pointing that out.

If it was contrary to the above, I wouldn’t have continued posting now, would I?


157 posted on 09/19/2009 4:52:22 PM PDT by OldSpice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice; Cicero; cpforlife.org; trisham; BykrBayb; wagglebee; little jeremiah; xzins; P-Marlowe; ..

You can twist and misrepresent what the Founding Fathers said all you want, but we know better about what they intended for the founding of this country than you do.

There have been plenty of other quotes posted here that prove you wrong.

You are not going to convince us otherwise. You are not going to destroy this country by casting doubts about the foundations it’s built on because we know better, any more than you’re going to turn people to atheist my casting dispersions on God and religion.

The only explanation for your attacks are that they are only for the purpose of destroying our faith and our country trying to undermine the confidence that we have in our country and form of government and basis of government. It’s not going to work.

Narses has already asked why you are here, what you are trying to accomplish, and what your previous screenname was, and you have obviously ignored every one of those questions.

Your posting history demonstrates that you are nothing but a troll and you’ve been called on it.


158 posted on 09/19/2009 4:52:57 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice; metmom; trisham; narses

Hey troll, if your thesis is that the Founding Fathers were all heathens you need to come with someone other than Einstein to validate it.


159 posted on 09/19/2009 4:53:06 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: OldSpice

Surely you don’t think I can read your mind. Do you?


160 posted on 09/19/2009 4:53:48 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 701-702 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson