Posted on 09/18/2009 5:44:31 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
What are you getting? Youre getting the same thing you got when he sold out Honduras to Chavez over that non-coup coup they staged: The warm fuzzy glow of knowing that George Bush would heartily disapprove.
But some members of Obamas own party, however, had a simple question for the administration: if this was a return to realism, and a concession to Russias long and vocal opposition to the missile program, what, exactly, was the U.S. getting in return for fundamentally changing it?
And almost certainly, the answer leads back to Iran But Russia has given no ground on those questions, with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov bluntly opposing tougher sanctions. And Medvedev suggested Thursday that any new American political capital would be more likely go toward the longer-term Obama Administration goal of deep cuts to the two countries nuclear weapons stocks If they wanted to engage in a process of negotiation over this they should have been transparent with the Polish and the Czech governments, said Randy Scheunemann, the top foreign policy advisor to the presidential campaign of Senator John McCain, who said cancelling the missiles in the countries was seriously misguided.
Unilateral preemptive concession in the hope that your negotiating partners will follow suit? Anyone who believes that will work with Russia hasnt looked at 70 years of Soviet history and 200 years of Russian history, Scheunemann said.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
wow, that article left me speechless.
Crack being the operative word there.
Almost 50 years to free Eastern Europe through the Cold War, and 4 years to give it back?
hh
It's clear that democrats are racist and can't accept that a black man is president.
I've seen this kind of behavior before and frankly it scares me. *tear*
Number 1 in your post is one of the scenarios Savage laid out yesterday. He went into the history of Persia and Russia and how it’s been rocky over the centuries. If this is the reasoning I can’t say I disagree and it may be the best international move made by this administration. I cannot see how a nuclear Iran would be in the interest of Russia.
He got scared when Russiaa played war games with China off our coast and threatened a nuke build up in Cuba and asked for ONE MILLION DOLLARS
<-------INSERT Putin's picture here
PLUS: 0bama got atleast two sweet business deals with his crony campaign donators.
Mostly the last one (aiding the Russians in their goal of bringing back the Soviet Union).
Not sure I know who Savage is. Please enlighten me.
less than 4 years.
The package deal. Not only does Russia get us not building a missile defense system, they get Ukraine and Georgia in the deal. And China gets goodies from us too, such as a defense trade cutoff with Taiwan. And they BOTH get us falling back to an idiotic launch on impact policy with our nuclear arsenal.
No wonder we are so screwed up as a country now. Even folks on our side don't have a clue what's going on.
Russia seeks a return of the Soviet Union and is allied closely with the ChiComs, Chavez, the Castro bros and others of the same ilk. Obama, as a loyal member of the U.S. communist left, is out to do whatever he can get away with to help them in this mission. In this case, help set the stage for an eventually Russian invasion of Poland and the Chec R. Look at what happened, and is going on right now, in Georgia.
” .by selling out he saves money to use for more programs to buy votes with in the cities.”
Bingo. You win the prize
It’s an interesting thing. People keep asking if Obama does what he does because he is dumb and naive or actually out to destroy the U.S. But to be a member of the commie left (who wants America to fall), one HAS TO be dumb and naive. So the answer IS “both”.
Bingo. You win the prize
The opposite is true. The commie left likes to spend tons of money on government programs because it takes money away from the military. One of their main aims is to cripple us militarily. They don't really believe in all those ridiculous social programs they advocate. It's a "spend money on anything but the military so to weaken us internationally" agenda.
Two words ... “campaign contributions.”
Mike Savage - conservative talk show host.
I also strongly agree with you on your analysis. I get it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.