Posted on 09/17/2009 8:26:34 PM PDT by Jeff Head
The delta is not the only place that has this smelt. It's nation wide, the mere fact that the tree huggers gave it a special name “delta smelt” were they able to fulfill their agenda.
heard of the California Aqueduct?
~~~
I sure have,,,
Retired utilities worker here,,,
Lived/worked in SoCal for years,,,
Ever heard of Pamo Dam in San Diego County ?
That got blocked because of some damned little bird!!!
As SD is at the far end of the aqueduct that would have
given them some of what they needed,,,
And that would have given more water to LA/etc,,,
And rite back up the line,,,
These peoples water got shut off because of a little fish!!!
Now their water runs out to sea...
That too...but it’s well beyond that...they want to shut down more and more of our agriculture, thereby making us dependent on foreign sources, and therby being able to have much more abject control over the people.
He certainly double-taked Hannity and I think Sean knew it when he ended the interview that Arnie isn’t going to do a thing to help those people.
California Farm Water Coalition www.cfwc.com
Family Farm Alliance www.FamilyFarmAlliance.org
Coalition for a Sustainable Delta http://www.SustainableDelta.com/
Latino Water Coalition http://www.GotWater.org/
Here is a better idea, look at the law and use the power of government against them.
Look, I heard all these Cities and Counties have signed letters to Obama. Make them put money where their mouth is.
Look for any way to tax the bejesus out of the constituencies of the President and the Democrat Party.
Look at County Easements where power is transmitted over it to power the city of San Fransisco, Tax it. See that water that is pumped from the ground in the county for the city, tax it.
Here a tax, there a tax, every where a tax tax.
Use the power of government to nail them in everyway you can.
Truck the water in on trucks (great for global warming) with the money.
I bet they will turn on the water themselves and they will be begging for you to stop.
USE THE POWER!
Way to go amom! Add all of those together...plus the two I pinged you too...and you have a good resource thread for the San Joaquin Water Crisis.
The ire of the people is what has to rise here. Thousands of people, turning the water on and then standing vigil over it. Embarassment to no end...people from all over the country flocking to aid the farmers...just like they did in Klamath.
The pressure would build and build until they simply had to turn it around...or risk civil upheavel, with them being the object of everyone's ire as the fault.
We've already shown that can work in Klamath...some of them just have to make that move and then be supported by the others...and us.
This was addressed in the program, they want to kill the farms so that they can take them over to plant solar arrays. It takes hundreds of square miles of land and millions of solar cells to power even a medium size city, but that means nothing to the "green" nuts.
BTW, anyone ever read Senate Bill 787 sponsored by, among others, Oregon's Ron Wyden? It's pretty scary, because it proposes to define as "waters of the United States" not just navigable waters, but ALL waters--thus placing them under the control of the Feds. Lookout owners of land (and beanfields)--your rights are being eroded away by a flood of Democrat sponsored legislation!
Right on my friend... this is war.
I do believe some things could be done along the lines of what you mentioned. I know it sounds unrealistic, but there are ways we could catch rain runoff on properties all over the southland, and save it in cisterns.
Water needs could be met for a month or two by using this water, and in good years, perhaps three months of water could be saved and used.
This water could be used for watering lawns, washing cars, and other things that might not require completely fresh water.
At my folks house in the foothills, they got over 45 inches of rain during the winter. You start thinking about the volume of water that represents over square miles of landscape.
I always thought that a folding system of plastic film could set up a natural runoff of water into a cistern and save literally thousands of gallons of water on just one property.
My folks have about half an acre. That should have worked out to about 2 acre feet of water on their property that year. If some way were devised to purify that rain water on their property, they could use it for all their needs. We might be talking about six months or more supply of water there.
http://fresnobeehive.com/opinion/2009/09/water_district_sells_farm_wate.html
Looks like water district sold the water.....not the farmers.
The more things change...the less they do!
Bump!
Saw this tonight... Obama wasn’t the president when this started, but unfortunately for him the people are more angry now and he needs to stop this insane blocking of water. Dream on...
“So, how’s that HOPE and CHANGE working out?” Change we hope to get free of :)
Well, in reality they actually are suffering from the effects of having less water than they deserve up there. Los Angeles takes a lot of water from the northern region of the state, including the San Joaquin Vally. If we supplied more of our own water, it would allow those farmers to retain more of their own, and use it to irrigate. If we’re not taking water from them directly, then water diverted from farther north could be used to help ease the water problems they have.
We have stressed the water needs of the state north of us, and I know we could do a lot better. It would sure make things better for our fellow citizens north of us.
Was just like yesterday. I’m in Alaska, but the warrior shoes are warming up....
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/10/09/national/a004925D81.DTL&type=printable
SoCal Farmers to Face Water Woes in 2009 By JACOB ADELMAN, Associated Press Writer Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.