Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A turf war over shaving
The Austin American-Statesman ^ | 09/14/2009 | Eric Dexheimer

Posted on 09/15/2009 3:51:57 PM PDT by GoldStandard

Joe Grondin has been a barber for more than 30 years. But there are some questions that, until very recently, he had never really pondered.

For example: "At what point on a man's sideburn does hair end and the beard begin?"

Or: "When does a trim become a shave?"

"It's crazy to be thinking about this," he admitted.

It might even be splitting hairs. But to Texas' 13,000 or so barbers, matters of shaving are worth fighting over. While state law permits both cosmetologists and barbers to groom hair, state regulators have consistently ruled that only barbers may scrape a man's cheeks.

(Excerpt) Read more at statesman.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; US: Texas
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2009 3:51:58 PM PDT by GoldStandard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

btt


2 posted on 09/15/2009 3:53:49 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

Hmmmm.......so, if a man comes into a cosmetologist and he shaves his head slick bald, but has a full beard right up to the top of his ears, what service(s) is she allowed to render?


3 posted on 09/15/2009 3:57:31 PM PDT by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: willgolfforfood

She?.......


4 posted on 09/15/2009 3:59:00 PM PDT by Red Badger (The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other peoples' money...M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Or he. Or it. Or Rover.

I answered your question. You answer mine.

5 posted on 09/15/2009 4:03:09 PM PDT by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

Absurd. Who knew Texas was a nanny state?


6 posted on 09/15/2009 4:10:44 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

Just more proof that a lot of licensing is just protectionism.


7 posted on 09/15/2009 4:16:19 PM PDT by ReagansShinyHair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

Yeh...I gotta remember to tell Rocco the next time I pop in for a trim that I know he’s trying to expand his business, but no Brazilian for me...


8 posted on 09/15/2009 4:17:55 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

There are men and there are those who use a cosmetologist.


9 posted on 09/15/2009 4:18:32 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Your It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

I am 57 and still use the same man who cut my hair the first time my dad said I could go to the barbershop. But I couldn’t go on saturday, cause that was for working men.


10 posted on 09/15/2009 4:22:32 PM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Lyndon Johnson.


11 posted on 09/15/2009 4:24:31 PM PDT by sig226 (Real power is not the ability to destroy an enemy. It is the willingness to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

12 posted on 09/15/2009 4:28:18 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Well I guess you have never driven on an Interstate through Texas. You would instantly determine it to be a nanny state as you viewed Hi way Patrol lined up in frenzied droves arresting people for minor traffic offenses. But most people on Freerepublic will defend that practice for the sake of safety.


13 posted on 09/15/2009 4:35:29 PM PDT by DariusBane (Even the Rocks shall cry out "Hobamma to the Highest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

Well, here’s one freeper that supports your righ to drive recklessly and with abandon.....


14 posted on 09/15/2009 4:38:29 PM PDT by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

"Bikini wax today Bill?"

15 posted on 09/15/2009 4:42:13 PM PDT by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

I go to a salon.
All the cutters and 80% of the customers are women.
Most generally quite good looking ones.

I tip big too....call it economic stimulus.


16 posted on 09/15/2009 4:43:57 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

Actually, I think a lot of stepped up law enforcement of traffic infractions has a revenue collection motivation now that tax receipts are declining.


17 posted on 09/15/2009 4:54:38 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nevergore

I think your being sarcastic...

I neither drive recklessly, nor do I drive with abandon. However, it is a simple ratio of risk transfer vs freedom. Most people demand the transference of risk onto others, hence very strict and highly enforced traffic laws. They do so at the price of a well funded, well organized, aggressive and armed police force. I on the other hand am willing to accept higher risk in return for a weak, unimpressive and hardly seen government presence on the road. It’s your choice, but the cowardly amongst us always always always want strict enforcement of seat belt laws, helmet laws, speed laws and they want lots and lots of signs directing mandatory compliance. I think it’s silly to empower overlords and am willing to accept the risk incumbent with that position in order to prove my point.

It is also a tiresome argument to accuse those who want less armed government thugs survailing them to also be law breakers. If I say that the war on drugs is stupid and accomplished nothing but expanding the role of federal power in the states I am always accused of being a pot smoker. If I advocate assuming risk on the roads in return for freedom I am accused of being a reckless driver. Sigh... I have heard the same stupid argument from statist conservatives for years.


18 posted on 09/15/2009 4:59:41 PM PDT by DariusBane (Even the Rocks shall cry out "Hobamma to the Highest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Well it is about revenue menehune, but it also about State and Local police becoming the long arm of federal power. It is the very definition of Federalism run amok to see very uniform traffic laws in all 50 federal states. But, your neighbors and mine will defend a strong, intrusive and aggressive police state and give your horrible visions of gore and Somalia like carnage to scare you into compliance!


19 posted on 09/15/2009 5:02:23 PM PDT by DariusBane (Even the Rocks shall cry out "Hobamma to the Highest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

Why, little ole’ me sarcastic? Never.....

Cops only enforce what laws we pass...and then only those pushed by administrators or politicians.....

This is now the case with the over zealous enforcement of most traffic laws.......Revenue enhancement by the politicians, the cops are just a tool.....


20 posted on 09/15/2009 5:30:13 PM PDT by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson