Skip to comments.
Official: No Ukrainian adoption for Elton John
Yahoo News (AP) ^
| 9/14/09
| MARIA DANILOVA
Posted on 09/14/2009 8:25:01 AM PDT by madprof98
KIEV, Ukraine Elton John will not be able to adopt a 14-month-old Ukrainian child because the pop star is too old and isn't traditionally married, Ukraine's minister for family affairs said Monday.
The pop signer toured a hospital for HIV-infected children in eastern Ukraine on Saturday as part of a charity project and said that he and his male partner David Furnish wanted to adopt an HIV-infected boy named Lev.
But the country's Family, Youth and Sports Minister Yuriy Pavlenko told The Associated Press that adoptive parents must be married and Ukraine does not recognize homosexual unions as marriage.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: adoption; alternativelifestyle; culturewar; eltonjohn; homosexualadoption; homosexualagenda; homosexualunions; keepowt; samesexadoption; samesexmarriage; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Thank God that this formerly "godless" country will stand up to the latest ones to claim that title. Now just wait for the gay mafia to demand nuclear war against Ukraine.
1
posted on
09/14/2009 8:25:03 AM PDT
by
madprof98
To: madprof98
Russia and China do not allow homosexual adoption either
2
posted on
09/14/2009 8:27:10 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(If we are astroturf, why are the democrats trying to mow us?)
To: madprof98
Good for Ukraine.
I didn’t know Elton’s John was still alive.
3
posted on
09/14/2009 8:27:14 AM PDT
by
Radagast the Fool
("Mexico-Beirut with tacos!"--Dr. Zoidberg)
To: madprof98
Just go to Africa and buy ‘em like Angelina, Elton. I think you can even get a volume discount.
4
posted on
09/14/2009 8:29:03 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
To: madprof98
Ukraine...Godless country....never....
To: madprof98
The old U.S.S.R. allowed neither homosexual adoption or open homosexuality.
6
posted on
09/14/2009 8:29:40 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: madprof98
I hope this holds up and they don’t cave for money. What a freak life that child would have had.
7
posted on
09/14/2009 8:30:43 AM PDT
by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black.)
To: madprof98
Elton John will not be able to adopt a 14-month-old Ukrainian child Elton John will not be able to recruit a 14-month-old Ukrainian child (fixed it!)
8
posted on
09/14/2009 8:31:51 AM PDT
by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: madprof98
I’m thinking Elton John and David Furnish probably have more comfortable means available to them for a HIV+ infant than an institutional Ukrainian orphanage.
9
posted on
09/14/2009 8:33:34 AM PDT
by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: madprof98
Why doesn’t he and his “wife” have one the natural way?
After all, homosexuality is normal, isn’t it?
To: Blue Jays
I’m thinking Elton John and his “partner” will use the denial as a publicity hammer to whack at the Ukraine’s values on a global scale.
11
posted on
09/14/2009 8:40:02 AM PDT
by
Kieri
(The Conservatrarian)
To: madprof98
To: madprof98
Way to go Ukraine. Do not cave in. Don't let the gay mafia intimidate you.
To: Kieri
I almost expect the Obama administration to try to pressure Ukraine to change its law—of course Elton John is not an American citizen but half of his fans in the US may not realize that. If Obama wasn’t already up to his neck in other problems of his own making, he might consider this a “teachable moment” for campaigning against “homophobia” (especially since gays are an important part of his base).
To: madprof98
Godless ? Only in government the Orthodox Church remains.
And now even in Russia ( probably Ukraine too ) prayer is allowed again in schools etc.
15
posted on
09/14/2009 8:57:24 AM PDT
by
lucias_clay
(All We Weed Up !)
To: Kieri
Yes, that's a definite possibility. I'm sure he'll seek for the MSM for coverage.
Whether Elton John and his partner David Furnish adopt a HIV+ baby or not doesn't impact me at all.
I do think the kid would have a better life given their means, compared to an orphanage.
16
posted on
09/14/2009 8:59:17 AM PDT
by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: madprof98
I think I’d rather grow up near Chernobyl than with Elton John as my Dad. :)
17
posted on
09/14/2009 9:00:07 AM PDT
by
cvq3842
(Countless thousands of our ancestors died to give us the freedoms we have today. Stay involved!)
To: Blue Jays
If they care about the child, they could provide the funds for him to be adopted and cared for by a normal married couple. In fact, all the rich, unmarried celebrities adopting needy children could do this - provide for the children to be adopted by parents who can give them a stable home life.
18
posted on
09/14/2009 9:11:46 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("This is our duty: to zot their sorry arses into the next time zone." ~ Admin Mod)
To: Tax-chick
They apparently wish to adopt an HIV+ child to raise for some reason.
Supplying money to others won't provide them a son or daughter.
I'm not a parent, nor do I wish to raise a child myself, yet it's a strong drive for many.
19
posted on
09/14/2009 9:19:38 AM PDT
by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: Blue Jays
Supplying money to others won't provide them a son or daughter.Proving that it has nothing to do with love of the child. It's ALL ABOUT THEM!
20
posted on
09/14/2009 9:40:01 AM PDT
by
T Minus Four
(I'm all wee-weed up!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson