[Blue Jays]

Yes, that's a definite possibility. I'm sure he'll seek for the MSM for coverage.
Whether Elton John and his partner David Furnish adopt a HIV+ baby or not doesn't impact me at all.
I do think the kid would have a better life given their means, compared to an orphanage.

[Tax-chick]

If they care about the child, they could provide the funds for him to be adopted and cared for by a normal married couple. In fact, all the rich, unmarried celebrities adopting needy children could do this - provide for the children to be adopted by parents who can give them a stable home life.

[my_pointy_head_is_sharp]

I’ve read some odd views by “Conservatives” today.

[Waryone]

I can imagine the horror of that poor child would equal the torture of the one year old adopted by gay Frank Lombard of Duke University. He started sexual relations with the one year old boy, filmed it, put it on the internet for his gay friends, and invited them to come join in.

No amount of money can get that poor boy's innocence back and you think it's fine for another child to be exposed to that?

Don't even try to say that Lombard is an isolated incident and that will never happen with Elton John. Once they cross one societal barrier regarding sex, they have no problem with demolishing any of the other barriers. Homosexuals like them young. The younger the better in their minds. According to Duke U. Lombard, it's better when they can't talk yet and recruitment into the gay lifestyle is their intent.

Some places to go:

http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/07/study-childhood-sexual-abuse-often-a-factor-in-sexual-disorientation/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2281373/posts