Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condo owner finds out he's been living and renovating in the wrong unit (DOH!!)
Ethiopian Review ^ | September 11th, 2009 | Mehret Tesfaye

Posted on 09/13/2009 6:44:28 PM PDT by 2banana

DENVER – He bought his first home, spent $30,000 fixing it up, and now, six months later, Jonathon Kyte has learned the home doesn't belong to him.

According to the City and County of Denver, Jonathon owns the dump, next door. He found out about the mistake almost by accident when he received a map which showed the unit he's living is actually unit No. 4.

"I froze. My wife and I were just speechless," Kyte said.

Kyte owns the deed and title to unit No. 5.

Jonathon blames the Coldwell Banker listing agent for the mistake. She marketed the property and provided the key to the unit Jonathon and wife have been living in.

He called the listing agent again and again, but she wouldn't return his calls. He also called the title company, "Colorado American Title," and an employee promised to get back to him, but never did.

So Jonathon called FOX 31 News. We confronted the listing agent's supervisor, but he would not comment on camera. He said their lawyers were looking into the situation.

Jonathon is now considered a squatter in unit No. 4, and the people who were so willing to sell it to him, are now unwilling to help.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bubble; condo; house; housing; oops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: 2banana

Oh man, that poor dude. I can just imagine the look his wife gave him when he told her...

“uh honey, have you finished plastering the bathroom yet?”

the wife sticks her head around the corner wiping the plaster encrusted sweat from her brow and replies... “probably be another hour sweetie, why, what’s up?”

The husband sheepishly folds and unfolds the letter hoping somehow the words he just read will magically rearrange themselves into something other that what they actually say...

“Um, you wanna hear something funny?”


21 posted on 09/13/2009 7:06:32 PM PDT by TruthBeforeAll (Honesty is like a knife... Used without love, it can do a lot of harm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

(and BTW, I doubt you can read this guy’s contract from where you are)


22 posted on 09/13/2009 7:07:04 PM PDT by 70times7 (Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Does title insurance cover this? Seems like he is the rightful owner of unit 5. I don’t see an issue for the title insurance.

Still, this smells like an urban legend.

Maybe he can trade units with the real owner of unit 5.

23 posted on 09/13/2009 7:08:22 PM PDT by cc2k (Are you better off today than you were $4,000,000,000,000 ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

If the agent was showing the unit he actually moved into, I would hope at least the agent had errors and omissions insurance.


24 posted on 09/13/2009 7:10:34 PM PDT by JBCiejka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Jonathon needs to hire a laywer. But at least it sounds like he has title insurance.

I have never seen title insurance cover anything. It is the most grossly overpriced form of insurance. The recourse will be from the Real Estate Agent who probably has errors and omission insurance.

25 posted on 09/13/2009 7:10:42 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

There are issues which have arisen from errors in title, but you are correct, they are few and far between.


26 posted on 09/13/2009 7:12:01 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, passport, and school records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

Their insurance company was Mutual Of Brooklyn.


27 posted on 09/13/2009 7:12:57 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, passport, and school records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

When he found out the bad news, he ran to his car to drive to Coldwell Banker.
But the keys were in the ignition and the car was locked.
So he tried to jig the lock with a coat hanger. A neighbor came by and said,
“Your top is down and it’s starting to rain,”
And he replied, “Duh!”


28 posted on 09/13/2009 7:14:41 PM PDT by tumblindice (Momma said, `Stupid is as stupid does.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

I was thinking of all the forms used in the loan and real estate transaction. They would all have the address on them. And nobody noticed?


29 posted on 09/13/2009 7:15:53 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, passport, and school records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Well, that deal certainly didn’t benefit Mr. Kyte.


30 posted on 09/13/2009 7:25:07 PM PDT by Defiant (Hey socialists-- We're right, we fight, get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty

Yeah a scam and they would’ve gotten away with it if it weren’t for you pesky kids! You series?


31 posted on 09/13/2009 7:25:43 PM PDT by steveo (Two Thousand Ten - Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Dad got a pay-out from the title company over a deed restriction that they missed. He wound up building a single story building instead of a multistory, and they paid dearly for the screw up. That is the ONLY title company payout I've ever heard of.

/johnny

32 posted on 09/13/2009 7:26:02 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (God Bless us all, each, and every one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Title insurance insures against flaws in the title to the property that he bought. Assuming the legal description in the deed and in the title police match the address he bought - he has insurance against title defects in the chain of ownership, of the unit he purchased. The fact that he was given keys to the unit next door and that he and the agent made an error in identifying the property, does not mean he has a title claim.


33 posted on 09/13/2009 7:35:13 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
hopefully, his title insurance includes an owner policy. Generally, title insurance only protects the lender.
34 posted on 09/13/2009 7:39:53 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

He is about to learn that the document labeled “title insurance” is merely a multi-thousand dollar piece of paper that excludes everything that could possibly happen in this universe or any other. It would be worth exponentially more if it had been left blank.

The realty, title company, surveyors, and lawyers involved in the deal will not be touched in the slightest.

They got their money, what do they care. That is all that matters to them.

Yea, I’m bitter.


35 posted on 09/13/2009 7:41:22 PM PDT by Clay Moore (Obama: A good example of why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

I wonder why someone would have keys to give someone for a property they were not representing.


36 posted on 09/13/2009 7:41:44 PM PDT by JBCiejka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

You are correct sir. As noted by others above, the buyer’s recourse is to Coldwell Banker, which, luckily for him, is one of the realtors still out there that is in business and has assets. He will get compensated—probably has been already, since this story is from March.


37 posted on 09/13/2009 7:43:50 PM PDT by Defiant (Hey socialists-- We're right, we fight, get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JBCiejka

When I saw that, my assumption was that Coldwell Banker was representing the owner of both units, perhaps the developer or a bank that took them in foreclosure.


38 posted on 09/13/2009 7:45:08 PM PDT by Defiant (Hey socialists-- We're right, we fight, get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

I’m figuring that both of the houses had doors, and both of the doors had locks, and that the keys to one house did not fit the locks on the other.

In other words, if it was an honest misunderstanding on his part, he would have noticed when the keys didn’t work.


39 posted on 09/13/2009 7:47:46 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Some one must have taken them through a walk through on the day of closing. Sounds like a whole bunch of people messed up.


40 posted on 09/13/2009 7:50:10 PM PDT by JBCiejka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson