Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What does Nancy know about Obama's eligibility ?
WorldNetDaily ^ | SEPTEMBER 09, 2009 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 09/09/2009 2:55:19 PM PDT by RobinMasters

Democratic officials are staying mum on some online images of Democratic National Convention Chair Nancy Pelosi's "Official Certification of Nomination" naming Barack Obama, of "5046 South Greenwood Avenue" in Chicago and Joe Biden, of "1209 Barley Mill Road" in Wilmington, Del., as the party's candidates for president and vice president in 2008.

The differences between the two documents that have been posted on bloggers, as well as linked in a report by the Canada Free Press, are revealing.

One references Pelosi's verification of Obama's eligibility to serve as president "under the provisions of the United States Constitution," while the other drops the reference to the constitutional requirements.

Both carry the signatures of House Speaker Pelosi as well as Alica Travis Germond, the secretary of the Democratic National Convention at its nominating meetings in Denver a year ago.

They were notarized by Shalifa A. Williamson of Denver.

WND contacted the Democratic National Committee to request an explanation of the two images, including whether one might be a forgery, but did not obtain any response other than a referral to a telephone answering machine.

Likewise, WND contacted the office of Pelosi, but likewise got no response.

The images:


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: RobinMasters

bump


21 posted on 09/09/2009 3:45:43 PM PDT by badgerlandjim (Hillary Clinton is to politics as Helen Thomas is to beauty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

“Make sure there is no standard practice with two forms submitted for different purposes or whatnot. Just trying to cover all the bases.”

I agree. But I can’t imagine any good reason for taking out the constitutional provision - if the candidate is eligible.


22 posted on 09/09/2009 3:50:08 PM PDT by ElayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: La.daddyrabbit
I understand this has little to do with the public Notary individual but I thought this was kinda interesting:
Shalifa Willamson (open secrets Democrat expenditures

I can find no other listen of this person other then in Open secrets on the net… nothing.

23 posted on 09/09/2009 3:50:08 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

24 posted on 09/09/2009 3:50:36 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Clearly there are differences in the signatures as well, so someone can’t just claim it’s a right wing Photoshop job. Funny that the one with the “Received” stamp is the one without the qualification clause.

Pelosi knows that something’s up.


25 posted on 09/09/2009 3:53:58 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CherylBower
A Notary only verifies the signatures are by the people who signed the document, not the veracity of the document itself, at least in Colorado.

And everywhere else. Also, legally the notary must see proof of identity of the signers before affixing his/her notary seal. My wife and daughter are both notaries.

Of course, who needs proof beyond her face that she is indeed *the* Nanzi Pelosi?

26 posted on 09/09/2009 3:59:43 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Around $400.000 for a notary is huge!!!


27 posted on 09/09/2009 4:02:49 PM PDT by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dinah Lord
And according to this expenditure detail over at Open Secrets, a Shalifa Williamson was paid a total of $38906 by the 2008 National Democratic Committee (From 8/15/07 through 9/30/08)

And there is a Shalifa Williamson who is married to a local Denver boxer named DaVarryl, nicknamed "Touch of Sleep" according to wikipedia

Shalifa and davarryl

28 posted on 09/09/2009 4:03:31 PM PDT by Dinah Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

You beat me to it! If it’s the same Shalifa, it looks like she’s connected to the DNCC. No surprise there, I guess.

I’d like to hear what she has to say about the duplicate documents. Surely, notarizing them would be a vivid memory for her.


29 posted on 09/09/2009 4:06:00 PM PDT by Dinah Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ElayneJ

Me neither. It’s a stretch, I know.

Again, in a country with a media that did its job we wouldn’t have to generate hundreds of posts speculation. I resent that most of the press is not doing its job - the task its Constitutional protection was partly based on.


30 posted on 09/09/2009 4:07:41 PM PDT by cvq3842 (Countless thousands of our ancestors died to give us the freedoms we have today. Stay involved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

speculation = speculating


31 posted on 09/09/2009 4:08:34 PM PDT by cvq3842 (Countless thousands of our ancestors died to give us the freedoms we have today. Stay involved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Two Kids' Dad; LucyT
And this kind of document is prepared by a team of lawyers, so you know it wasn't just a simple oversight on their part.

Someone must have reminded her that she could get in hot water for making a false statement on that document.

32 posted on 09/09/2009 4:16:59 PM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

bm


33 posted on 09/09/2009 4:21:21 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters; Cyropaedia; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ...
Thanks, RobinMasters and Cyropaedia.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

34 posted on 09/09/2009 4:23:54 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: STARWISE; hoosiermama

PING!


37 posted on 09/09/2009 4:30:28 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Many thanks, LucyT

Ping.


38 posted on 09/09/2009 4:37:23 PM PDT by Iowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

Yes. The media is only fueling the speculation by doing nothing. obama could bring it all to an end, too, but of course he won’t.


39 posted on 09/09/2009 4:40:40 PM PDT by ElayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

Well ain’t that special?!


40 posted on 09/09/2009 4:44:02 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson