Shocker! Judge orders trial on eligibility issue

WND ^ | 9/8/09 | staff

[pissant]

A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.

In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.

In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent defendants Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, were restored as plaintiffs.

But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery – that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.

[fieldmarshaldj]

Ribbit.

[Non-Sequitur]

Your the one crowing on about all the judges who’ve dismissed their cases for lack of standing, most often on the first wiff they get.

Name one case where the judge granted a motion to dismiss without the plaintiff having a chance to respond first. I certainly can't.

Carter has had two opportunities to follow that same path.

So what you're saying is that the judge could dismiss the case without giving Taitz a chance to read the motion or respond? Fortunately the judge knows the process even if you don't.

But hey, while we're at it let's take a look at how Orly did on her motions, shall we?

Motion for review of Judge Nakazato's August 6th order striking the Kenyan birth certificate from the record - denied.
Motion to recuse Judge Nakazato - denied.
Motion for a early and expedited hearing on Discovery - denied.

[Freedom2specul8]

I hate using wiki, but it can be good in a pinch. I have no opinions other than to say..I pray he will hold no bias.

---

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_O._Carter

Carter was nominated by President Bill Clinton on June 25, 1998 to fill a seat vacated by William J. Rea. Carter was confirmed by the United States Senate on October 21, 1998, and received his commission the following day.[1] He now sits in the Southern Division of the Central District of California in Orange County, California.

[TheBigIf]

Obama is now using tax payer dollars and the DOJ to argue that American citizens and the Court have no right to challenge his elgibility.

[murphE]

Jan. 26, 2010???? Nothin’ like timely justice.

[afnamvet]

Wellll now...that puts a new spin on things. Stay tuned...

How so? Does it change Judge Carter's record of convictions? The word spin is bull$hit with four letters.

[TheBigIf]

If this judge orders discovery on October 5th then this case is already over.

Obama can not submit to discovery or he will be ruined.

That would be very swift and timely justice.

[madamemayhem]

so let me get this clear, you want to know why, right?

[MHGinTN]

I’m still waiting for someone to explain to me how having multiple SS#’s actually aides someone as young as Barry? What are they used for that he would want or need so many SS#’s?

[faucetman]

“Funny. Glenn has been a real turd when it comes to this subject, frankly”

He has, but he is on a different track. Risking enough already. No need to add a “BIRTHER” problem.

Nobody wants to get afterbirther on themselves.

[faucetman]

“Funny. Glenn has been a real turd when it comes to this subject, frankly”

He has, but he is on a different track. Risking enough already. No need to add a “BIRTHER” problem.

Nobody wants to get afterbirther on themselves.

[Fred Nerks]

http://www.laotze.blogspot.com/

Can’t remember the Freeper name, something like American Expat in SE Asia. He will be able to find out.

[rolling_stone]

I thought it was go here:

https://www.ibaby.org/applications.action

then bar exam applications
browse forms

(check out instructions for extra credit)

and the place I quoted was at Character and fitness questionaire, just continue through the questions..

[MHGinTN]

Do you know if someone of U.S. citizenship must show a SS# to open an offshore bank account?

[jcsjcm]

If you were to read the DoJ argument against the use of quo warranto in this instance, you would see they cited just one case that really has nothing to do with the facts of this case. All it did was cite that jurisdiction for quo warranto within the District of Columbia lies in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. In other words, the DoJ has no argument that quo warranto is not appropriate.

I've heard this comment before where the District of Columbia would be the place to bring such a case?

Have you heard the same thing and do you think that its possible that some are trying to steer us in that direction? Small clues???

Hopeful thinking???

[Danae]

YES!

Oh how interesting is DISCOVERY going to be????

[PA-RIVER]

BC Trolls, like rubber necks on the freeper highway. Ha Ha.

Tell the truth, your tune in hoping that it cracks wide open and Obama flees in the middle of the night....

[Sibre Fan]

Here’s the actual Court Order from today’s hearing. Not quite what WND reported.

http://ia301520.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.cacd.435591/gov.uscourts.cacd.435591.58.0.pdf

[Danae]

You are right on.

[afnamvet]

See post # 306