Skip to comments.
Minot Air Force Base to activate new B-52 squadron
Associated Press ^
| Aug 27, 2009
Posted on 09/03/2009 3:52:41 PM PDT by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
1
posted on
09/03/2009 3:52:41 PM PDT
by
george76
To: george76
"....a new B-52 bomber...."
Cool, those Model Hs were getting long in the tooth.
2
posted on
09/03/2009 3:53:49 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: Paladin2
4
posted on
09/03/2009 3:55:54 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: george76
Air strikes planned on Freepers and town hall mobs?
5
posted on
09/03/2009 3:56:11 PM PDT
by
KeyLargo
To: Paladin2
lol! My grandfather flew them in Vietnam.
6
posted on
09/03/2009 3:56:19 PM PDT
by
neodad
(This tagline reported to flag@whitehouse.gov)
To: CholeraJoe
7
posted on
09/03/2009 3:57:33 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
I suppose we need something to give up when we disarm.
8
posted on
09/03/2009 3:58:59 PM PDT
by
depressed in 06
(Idiotcracy has arrived 400 years early.)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: george76
new B-52 bomber I've got the plans right here...
To: neodad
I heard of reports of B-52 pilot discovering by aircraft serial number that his grandfather flew the very same aircraft. It would be possible I guess, but I have not seen any actual story to verify it.
11
posted on
09/03/2009 4:03:23 PM PDT
by
KeyLargo
To: F15Eagle
12
posted on
09/03/2009 4:07:14 PM PDT
by
KeyLargo
To: KeyLargo
One of James Earl Jones first movies.
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: KeyLargo
The B-52 doing nuclear missions?
Riiiiiiiiiiiiggggggghhhhhhhtttttttt!
Unless it's carrying a Cloaking Device, the B-52 couldn't get to its target now in a nuclear environment in a Month of Sundays. It's radar signature must be off the chain!
"Now if you take a big plane like a 52, see..."
Teh Won's cancellation of the B-3 will have serious effects for strategic air down the line.
Best,
Chris
15
posted on
09/03/2009 4:13:02 PM PDT
by
section9
To: george76
This is too funny. They are finally going to make a squadron of the bombers they have been keeping up to date but supposedly not in the active inventory.
16
posted on
09/03/2009 4:18:29 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
To: section9
Between the electronic countermeasures and the nuke-tipped cruise missiles, a B-52 is very difficult to defend against.
17
posted on
09/03/2009 4:20:50 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Squantos
18
posted on
09/03/2009 4:21:40 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: george76
Mebe they got a plan to bomb the $h!t out of Afghanistan. A little more rubble, a lot less trouble.
19
posted on
09/03/2009 4:23:15 PM PDT
by
ArtyFO
(I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
To: KeyLargo
Loved that...I need to get the DVD....only have it on VHS...been many years since I watched it....
20
posted on
09/03/2009 4:23:18 PM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson