Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KeyLargo
The B-52 doing nuclear missions?

Riiiiiiiiiiiiggggggghhhhhhhtttttttt!

Unless it's carrying a Cloaking Device, the B-52 couldn't get to its target now in a nuclear environment in a Month of Sundays. It's radar signature must be off the chain!

"Now if you take a big plane like a 52, see..."

Teh Won's cancellation of the B-3 will have serious effects for strategic air down the line.

Best,

Chris

15 posted on 09/03/2009 4:13:02 PM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: section9

Between the electronic countermeasures and the nuke-tipped cruise missiles, a B-52 is very difficult to defend against.


17 posted on 09/03/2009 4:20:50 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: section9
Unless it's carrying a Cloaking Device, the B-52 couldn't get to its target now in a nuclear environment in a Month of Sundays. It's radar signature must be off the chain!

The B-52 would be a standoff platform to launch nuclear cruise missiles in a real strategic environment. Launch shortly after takeoff from Guam and nuke Vladivostok.

30 posted on 09/03/2009 4:57:31 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: section9; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; cyphergirl; ...

Aviation ping


43 posted on 09/04/2009 3:47:12 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson