Posted on 09/01/2009 4:43:21 AM PDT by chessplayer
Naomi Wolf Discovers That Shrouds Are Sexy
Women in chadors are really feminist ninja warriors. Rather than allow themselves to be gawked at by male strangers, they choose to defeat the “male gaze” by hiding from it in plain view.
Ah, but do the chadors come in earth tones?
This is Helen Thomas's dream.
She could pull all sorts of tricks on unsuspecting Freepers!!!!
These left fems don't know it, but American Men, unlike their jihadi counterparts, do not purchase goods at the Kazbah, sight unseen.
And its more fun to beat a woman in a chador, sort of like a punchingbag, according to the Taliban.
Yeah, bring on those feminist chadors. The feminists are confused. First the burned their bras, took off all their clothes,reveled in being sex objects, and then immediately flipped to being Victorian.
Now they have gone off the deep end saying" I control who can see me!!!"
Let us know how that works out in your search for conubial bliss, losers!
Hey Naomi why don’t you wear one whenever your out of the house you stupid, stupid bi*ch.
Most of the feminist I have seen probably should be hidden under a Burqa.
As a group they are certainly not the most attractive, and when they begin their shrill talk, it dispells any doubt.
Feminists should insist that Muslim men wear Burqas too.
That’s like the slave masters telling their slaves that shackles are the ultimate symbol of freedom.
The heights of stupidity they attain when trying to blow mind-storms through “brilliant critique” never ceases to amaze me.
And let’s also bear in mind that the burqa along with the male counterpart the “nightshirt,” are NOT part of traditional Islamic garb.
They were encouraged during the 1970’s as part of the separatist movement of militant Islam. The potato sack and the nightshirt were and are both intended for radicals to identify them self as separate from any culture and from any nation in which they may live.
To wear the burka is the ultimate feminist CHOICE, but to keep your baby with Down’s syndrome is to push back the feminist movement 100 years.
Yeah, no twists and turns in logic there!
Who do they work for? The “prince of this world”. Is it any wonder that their “logic” is twisted?
Many educated and largely urban American women long ago rejected traditional family life in favor of career aspirations and what they perceived as independence.
Now in middle age, they find themselves isolated, angry, bitter, barren, and childless. And somehow it is all the fault of the men whose company and care they rejected.
Well, have you ever stop and think that these women are really, really ugly? Maybe they are doing us a favor...just throwing it at there...
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
Well, there is certainly that factor at work. But I'm not talking about the plug-uglies of NOW here: I'm speaking about otherwise attractive women who voluntarily turned themselves away from some of the better things in life in order to experience.... what? A warped idea of independence. Not the sort that comes from peace with one's own self, but the kind that begins with anger and fear and ends in loneliness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.