Posted on 08/28/2009 8:21:55 PM PDT by rxsid
New Law suit filed in the Western District of Texas. Flight Surgeon Cpt Connie Rhodes, MD refuses to be deployed to Iraq until Obama’s legitimacy for the position of the Commander in Chief is verified Orly Taitz, Esq
Attorney & Counselor at Law
26302 La Paz ste 211
[snip]
(Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice
U.S.D.C. Western District of Texas
Submitted August 28, 2009)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Western district of Texas
CPT Connie Rhodes MD,
Plaintiff,
v.
Dr ROBERT GATES, UNITED
STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE,
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, de facto
PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES,
Defendants.
APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
Plaintiff Captain Dr. Connie Rhodes has received what appear to be facially valid orders mobilizing her to active duty with the United States Army in Iraq on September 5th, 2009 (Exhibit A). Captain Rhodes is both a US army officer and a medical doctor, a flight surgeon. On May 15th of this year 501 brigade out of Fort Campbell, KY, currently stationed in Iraq, has requested a support of medical personal in Iraq. Two days ago, August the 23rd, an order was given through the chain of command via e-mail for Captain Rhodes to arrive in San Antonio TX, Fort Sam Houston for Tactical Combat Medical Care Course (TCMC) to be held from August 30th till September 4t and next day, on September the 5th to arrive in Fort Benning in Columbus GA for immediate deployment to Iraq for a period of one year and twelve days from September 5th, 2009 until September 17th 2010. Captain Dr. Connie Rhodes wants to serve her country and fulfill her tour of duty, however as a US army officer and a medical doctor she has severe reservations regarding legitimacy of Barack Obama as the Commander in Chief and repercussions of her service under his orders, particularly in light of mounting evidence of him having allegiance to other Nations and citizenship of Kenya, Indonesia and Great Britain.
...
Continued: "http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4038"
Is Orly Taitz completely stupid? Or is the concept of proof-reading her cut-n-paste legal filings completely foreign to her?
ping
“Is Orly Taitz completely stupid? Or is the concept of proof-reading her cut-n-paste legal filings completely foreign to her?”
I think this is not fair to Orly Taitz. Having been involved with several legal cases I have found most attorneys make this kind of spelling error. Even those lawyers born in the USA with the benefit of life-long residence and education here.
She is doing the heavy lifting under extremely difficult circumstances. You should give her a break.
She also says that Rhodes is going to Afghanistan, but the actual deployment order (and the TX TRO Motion) says Rhodes is going to Iraq. There’s a few (dozen) more similiar “issues” — She spells Colum[b]us wrong; she refers to her pro hac vice motion from Florida (in this Georgia Court); She seeks a jury trial for injunctive and declaratory relief; and much more....
Spelling errors? Try gender errors, geographical errors, procedural errors, and so on. It seems that every one of her filings is designed for one reason and one reason only, to be dismissed as quickly as possible.
She is doing the heavy lifting under extremely difficult circumstances. You should give her a break.
OK, I'm sorry she's incompetent.
File a suit that says, very simply, "the defendant has publicly stated that a foreign government "governed" him at birth", "your honor, can a US NBC be governed at birth by a foreign power?"
Would the court simply "take his word" that such was the case? Or...would the court order discovery? If it turned out during the discovery that his (alleged) father's marriage to his (alleged) mother was not legal...and therefore he didn't have British citizenship at birth and therefore his public statement admitting such is not truthful...at least discovery would have occurred, possibly answering MANY other questions about Barry (i.e. real place of birth, real father, real mother, real birth date, etc).
Why not challenge him on his own "admission" of being governed at birth by a foreign power?
See:
advisory opinion
n. an opinion stated by a judge or a court upon the request of a legislative body or government agency. An advisory opinion has no force of law but is given as a matter of courtesy. A private citizen cannot get an advisory ruling from a court and can only get rulings in an actual lawsuit. State attorneys general also give advisory opinions at the request of government officials. These opinions are often cited as the probable correct law on the subject but are not binding.
http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=2358&bold=%7C%7C%7C%7C
actual controversy
n. a true legal dispute which leads to a genuine lawsuit rather than merely a “cooked up” legal action filed to get a court to give the equivalent of an advisory opinion. Federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, will only consider an “actual controversy”, on appeal, since they will not give advisory (informal) opinions or make judgments on “friendly suits” filed to test the potential outcome.
http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=2319
Leo Donofrio thinks only Quo Warranto action brought by the US AG or the DC Circuit Court could be successful now that Obama has been sworn in, absent impeachment. Quo Warranto, unlike a civil or criminal lawsuit, puts the burden of proof on Obama to show that he is eligible. See Leo’s site for details:
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
Why not challenge him on publicly admitted "facts?"
Why, then, not ask a court how he could be US NBC based on public admissions of being governed by a foreign power?
On the contrary, virtually all other cases HAVE been "fishing expeditions" so far as I can tell (being a non lawyer).
What would be your recommendation as to how a case should be brought forward?
Allege to the court he can't be US NBC based on public admissions of being governed by a foreign power.
Or, do you have a better idea?
Leo Donofrio thinks only Quo Warranto action brought by the US AG or the DC Circuit Court could be successful now that Obama has been sworn in, absent impeachment. Quo Warranto, unlike a civil or criminal lawsuit, puts the burden of proof on Obama to show that he is eligible. See Leo’s site for details:
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
Yeah, he’s been saying that since, at least, January.
Lucas Declaration as well as a copy of his (alleged) Kenyan B.C. for Barry, have been filed with the Cpt. Rhodes case now recently re-filed in the middle district of Georgia (where Ft. Benning is located)
#692.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2327189/posts?page=692#692
Ops, wrong court, wrong military plainfiff. Filed with the Central Disctric of CA (Capt. Barnett).
Also, as others have previously mentioned, the date of this court hearing is the same date/time as Barry's "speach" to the school kids.
Why did this thread die? The affidavit will outlive the law suit. Is the copy of the BC real or not?
What happens if she reports as ordered, but also pursues her lawsuit?
Great question. It all comes down to what she says - outside of her legal filings - and how she says it. If she keeps her head down, her mouth shut and shows up for duty, then my guess is she won't face any disciplinary actions. Of course, it all comes down to her command and how patient or tolerant they are.
They could just get rid of her. I'm not exactly sure how the Army does it. But, it's probably an administrative review board. Remember, officers serve at the "pleasure of the President". But, I would be wildly surprised if that would happen - at least initially. I'm SURE it will happen eventually.
There's some dispute that this Captain is under a service obligation because of prior scholarship monies paid on either her graduate or post-graduate education. If she is obligated, I VERY much doubt she'll be dismissed right away. I would think that the Army would get their pound of flesh.
If they would move to dismiss, it would be an understatement to say it would have PROFOUND impact or good discipline and moral, for a whole variety of reasons.
“By the way, what the hell is an NBC?”
NBC= Natural Born Citizen, not National Broadcasting Company in this instance, lol.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.