Posted on 08/25/2009 2:47:30 PM PDT by AJMCQ
Back in October of 2008, when the subject of Obama’s Constitutional eligibility to be president of the United States was just a blip on the radar screen of public awareness, I wrote an article about how easy it was to find my then -92-year-old mother’s birth certificate.
Frankly, I didn’t think finding my mother’s birth certificate was possible, given the fact that she had been born in a farmhouse in Storrs, CT, along with nine of her 10 siblings, to parents who didn’t speak English. Despairing that she would never be “qualified” to receive the care [in a nursing home} that she desperately needed, I set about to find the document, which I was sure had vanished in the unreliable record-keeping of 1913. When I called the third number, I explained to the woman who answered the phone that I was “asking something impossible.” I gave her my mother’s first name and her father’s last name. Within four minutes, she said, “Here it is!” When I expressed my amazement, the woman said: “That’s nothing…we’re routinely asked to find birth certificates from the 1800s, and we do that all the time!” Total time it took me to find my mother’s 1913, born-in-a-farmhouse birth certificate: 10 minutes!
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Then why doesn’t an experienced and competent conservative attorney team up with her and/or give her some counseling? I just want the truth to be known.
I recall seeing the request for an Obama birth certificate in March, 2008. This was about the same time that the libs were calling for McCain’s birth certificate and the hearings were held by Congress on his eligibility. I don’t recall the blogger’s name or his blog site but I began watching and watched closely until it showed up on Kos. I have always thought this Kos copy was a forgery from day 1 and still do. I began contacting my reps in Congress long before the election because I thought Obama and his team were committing fraud and thereby stealing the election. When they prevailed, I wrote more letters to Congress,the Supreme Court, Hawaii governor, and my state election offices before the swearing in and after.
1 Certified copy of original birth certificate
2 Columbia University transcripts
3 Columbia thesis paper
4 Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5 Harvard University transcripts
6 Illinois State Senate records
7 Illinois State Senate schedule
8 Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9 Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mother
10 Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11 Occidental College Transcripts
12 Parent’s marriage Certificate
13 Record of baptism
14 Selective Service registration records
15 Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16 Passport records for all passports
17 Scholarly articles
18 SAT and LSAT test scores
19 Access to his grandmother in Kenya
20 List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists
21 Punahou grade school records
All other Presidents have provided these types of personal documents, why is 0bama not held to the same standard?
ping
I am beginning to wonder which side some of these “conservatives” are really on. Why kvetch about Obama....but do nothing to remove him for holding office illegally?
Maybe they don't believe that he was born in Kenya. Maybe they think that there's nothing behind that story. If Obama's not holding office illegally, isn't this a distraction?
It's not too late, get busy!
> Perhaps it was the nutcase Orly Taitz.
> A competent person working on this might have made a difference.
Orly Taitz is a patriot. She has spent several thousand dollars of her own money.
What have you done.
Second, there are half a dozen cases in process. A discovery hearing for one of Taitz cases will be heard on Sept 8th in Southern Calif. The Kerchner v. Obama case has been in New Jersey District Court since August 3rd. Someone is being very careful about responding.
Big-time attorneys have too much to lose by getting involved. They are praying that as Obama’s soft coup is understood, he will lose enough support in 2010 to finish the job. They have the resources to survive for some years until some of the damage Obama is doing is undone.
Taitz has been attacked viciously for almost a year, and continues to fight. She makes no claim of being a constitutional scholar. She's a proud mom seeing her adopted country fall to the communism and antisemitism she escaped by leaving Moldavia. She has brought the fact of Obama’s eligibility to a worldwide audience. She corrected Berg, who focused on issues unlikely ever to be proved such as Kenyan birth, explaining the meaning natural-born citizenship in a January press conference of 2008. She has just had Facebook lock her out, perhaps from having too many congessmen sign up as "friends." The Wordpress template used at her blog has had malware inserted. (Who could access that template?) She is on our side, not the caliber attorney of Donofrio, who thinks The Republic is finished, or Apuzzo, who is thorough, careful, and may have broken through the legal blockades. But neither Apuzzo nor Donofrio are promoters. We need scholars and we need promoters, so that the public which is cowed by the Alinsky smear tactics and legal nonesense, is made aware that there is a real issue. Orly is an effective promoter or she wouldn't be under constant attack. Orly, Donofrio, Craig, Kerchner, and Apuzzo are our warriors.
If the courts do not address Obama’s lack of citizen parents disqualification, some attorneys claim that the precedence will alter the meaning of the term, opening the door to the well-funded child of non-citizen terroists, or spys, or drug cartel chiefs, to the presidency. Just look at Obama’s background: Marxist father, Marshall Davis, Whalid bin-Talal, Louis Farrakhan, Rashid Khalidi, Bill Ayres, Van Jones. Partly because he was born a British Citizen, we have little background on Barry, and it is all sealed.
If the supreme court doesn't address Obama’s natural-born disqualification, they are less likely to address it when he runs for a second term, and the republic will have become, as one of George Soros’ sons promoted in a Wall St. Jr. op-ed, a Democracy - mob rule, but with czars and a supreme court made impotent by a “living” constitution - a constitution which Obama has always said “doesn't allow me to do the things I think need doing.”
The court must affirm natural-born citizenship or our constitution will likely have been amended by precedence.
Obama must be assumed to have had his SEIU friends destroy any documents in government archives. He has stated unequivocally that his father was a British Citizen, making Obama a “dual citizen” at birth. A dual citizen cannot have absolute allegiance to one nation, and no statue can make a dual citizen a “natural-born citizen.”
Have you ever heard a reson given for why “it’s too late?”
Well he does have a social security number from there. ;<)
Who is Craig?
What has happened with the three cases Berg says he filed?
“I am beginning to wonder which side some of these “conservatives” are really on.”
First and foremost, they are on the side of keeping their own jobs.
They will rock the boat about Obama enough to keep their audience but not so much as to be called on the carpet by their corporate bosses.
These guys frustrate us when they don’t go all the way in pursuit of Obama but we really should remind ourselves that they are principally entertainers and are not actually “leaders” of any movement or group.
Exactly. Nothing worse than Monday morning quarterbacks. Orly is doing her best...where are the reinforcements?
She should hurry up and spend the rest so we can hear the last of her gibbering idiocy.
What have you done
Same as you, have an opinion.
Is that a problem for you?
I should have worded that better.
It’s not “too late,” it’s just that right now there are other huge vulnerabilities that resonate more with the general public and that have the potential to bring Obama down.
Beck is hitting hard on these issues this week, and he’s striking a cord with the mega-audience that he’s drawing.
He doesn’t get the BC issue, although I think he would if he had time to look more closely at it. That doesn’t bother me as a “birther”; he’s doing his part, and brilliantly.
It was just settled a few weeks ago, and does appear to affirm that statute (laws) cannot make someone a natural born citizen, confirming the nonsense when someone invokes the 14th amendment or the 1790 Naturalization Act.
There are a number of people who are learning more than they ever expected to learn about the intent of our founders - thank God! I hope they hurry.
I have paid little attention to Berg. I am concerned given his association with Hillary and Soros, about his motives. I hope I'm wrong. But his avoidance of Obama’s Article II Sec. 1 Clause 5 ineligibility has caused me to stop paying attention. His attacks on Taitz also give me pause. If he isn't running legal interference, he is doing a reasonably good job of pretending.
I sharea some of your concerns about Berg and have gained some personal knowledge that he is not really paying attention. I had been told that he had been a workder fro Hillary. But what is his association with Soros? This is a very important question, belive me.
I had forgotten about Craig, who is, I believe pro se.
Good article, in case you missed it Ping~
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.