What's next?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
2 posted on
08/24/2009 8:16:44 PM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Same old welfare queens will turn up to charge their appliances to their unborn to pay interest on.
3 posted on
08/24/2009 8:17:31 PM PDT by
org.whodat
(Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sales of dishwashers, refrigerators, and washing machinesthe three appliances covered by the appliance-rebate programhave been off by some 25 percent from their peak during the last housing boom. Given that we have the mother of all un-booms going on now, to be down by 25% isn't bad at all.
4 posted on
08/24/2009 8:18:32 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Barack Obama is a political suicide bomber and the Rats are political arsonists.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
5 posted on
08/24/2009 8:19:06 PM PDT by
freebilly
( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Another giveaway for the scum at General Electric. Immelt is on the board of the NY Federal Reserve which is now headed by an AFL-CIO goon.
6 posted on
08/24/2009 8:19:42 PM PDT by
Frantzie
(Lou Dobbs - American Hero! Bill O'Reilly = Liar)
To: Big Giant Head
9 posted on
08/24/2009 8:21:51 PM PDT by
Marie Antoinette
(Proud Clinton-hater since 1998.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
And while the money is coming from Washington, how much you get for which appliance will be a state-by-state decision.Can you step across a state-line for the best deal?
10 posted on
08/24/2009 8:22:47 PM PDT by
Buddy B
(MSgt Retired-USAF - Year: 1972)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Who or what could we trade in Al Gore for? He’s full of more hot air than anything or anyone else I can think of! ;-)
11 posted on
08/24/2009 8:23:25 PM PDT by
ThunderSleeps
(obama out now! I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom - you can keep the change.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The whole thing is reminiscent of China's Great Leap Forward where the population was encouraged to collect iron, scrap and otherwise, to feed the state smelters which then produced inferior metal. Maybe next we'll be told to kill birds for the good of the State.
12 posted on
08/24/2009 8:23:50 PM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: 2ndDivisionVet
D-LA. Congressman Jefferson was way ahead on this scheme. He had cash in his freezer.
13 posted on
08/24/2009 8:25:39 PM PDT by
bleach
(Wake me in 2012)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
You can pick up any of those appliances at a thrift store for about $25.
This is ridiculous. Throw away a gum wrapper, they freak out because you're not recycling our precious resources. Throw away an automobile, a dishwasher, a washing machine and a refrigerator and you're a hero.
They're really going to go through all this crap for an appliance that's 10% to 25% more energy efficient? And they're really going to act shocked when the paltry sum of money they've allotted is grossly insufficient?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
windows. We’re going to have a national day of breaking windows to stimulate the economy
18 posted on
08/24/2009 8:44:02 PM PDT by
4rcane
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I bet they really want the older refrigerators because they contain a formula of Freon that’s been banned (but is more efficient).
19 posted on
08/24/2009 8:46:31 PM PDT by
Fast Moving Angel
(GOP: Stop listening, start doing -- we need new leaders!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Cash for day laborers to mow my lawn or patch my drywall?
-PJ
21 posted on
08/24/2009 8:49:22 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(This just in... Voting Republican is a Terrorist act!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
25’ Airstream camp trailers would be nice. ;>)
24 posted on
08/24/2009 9:12:44 PM PDT by
Gator113
(It's about stupidity, stupid. IMPEACH HERE, IMPEACH NOW.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Does anyone know what exactly this covers? I’d love to buy another freezer and wondered if that might be eligible?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What's next? Cash for cash.
Turn in your devalued $100 bill for a crisp new $1 bill which has the same purchasing power. South America has a history of this.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
30 posted on
08/24/2009 11:00:54 PM PDT by
FromLori
(FromLori)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
A program which insists upon the destruction of a less-than-optimally-efficient device will itself be inefficient if, had the device not been destroyed, it could have replaced a less efficient one. This is true no matter how the “efficiency” of the device is measured. Considering that government “efficiency” measurements often don’t really measure the desirability of a device (is a machine that uses less water but cleans less effectively more “efficient”?), it should be clear that programs to trash old equipment are at best ill-advised.
37 posted on
08/25/2009 4:06:48 PM PDT by
supercat
(Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson