Skip to comments.
Bomber Release 'Damages Scotland'
BBC ^
| Saturday, 22 August 2009
Posted on 08/22/2009 3:01:57 PM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Attention Terrorists: They have declared open season on the skies over the United Kingdom.
To: nickcarraway
Has Senator Specter, America’s foremost expert on Scottish law, weighed in on this yet?
To: nickcarraway
Yeah, all those strongly worded letters are really bringing the Scots down.
To: nickcarraway
Colonel Gadaffi has said that Prime Minister Gordon Brown had "encouraged" the Scottish Government to take what he called a "courageous" decision, but the Foreign Office has strongly denied claims it was linked to a trade deal between the UK and Libya.Brown and Obama - two of a terrorist-loving kind.
4
posted on
08/22/2009 3:07:21 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: All
ON THE INTERNET:
FBI.gov - Press Release: "LETTER FROM FBI DIRECTOR ROBERT S. MUELLER,III, TO SCOTTISH MINISTER KENNY MACASKILL" (August 21, 2009) (Read More...)
Link (pdf)
Video - Link
CNS NEWS.com: "DISREGARDING U.S. APPEALS, LIBYA CELEBRATES FREED LOCKERBIE CONVICT" by Patrick Goodenough (August 21, 2009)
BBC NEWS: "HOMECOMING FOR LOCKERBIE BOMBER" (Page last updated August 20, 2009, 00:11 UK)
BBC NEWS: "LARGE CROWDS GREET MEGRAHI IN LIBYA" (Page last updated August 20, 2009, 21:36 UK)
VOA NEWS.com: "U.S. WARNS LIBYANS NOT TO MAKE HERO OF LOCKERBIE FIGURE" by David Gollust, State Department (SNIPPET: "...Abdel Baset al-Megrahi...") (August 20, 2009)
ASSIST NEWS SERVICE: Edinburgh, Scotland - "LOCKERBIE BOMBER STEPS CLOSER TO LEAVING SCOTTISH PRISON SYSTEM" by Michael Ireland (August 18, 2009)
YNET NEWS.com (REUTERS): "LIBYA ASKS FOR LOCKERBIE BOMBER TO BE FREED" (Published July 25, 2009, 19:37/Israel News)
VICTIMS OF PAN AM FLIGHT 103.org: "VICTIMS"
Indictment - Link
IMAGES: "LOCKERBIE BOMBING"
5
posted on
08/22/2009 3:07:23 PM PDT
by
Cindy
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: nickcarraway
I’ll bet the average Scott is just about as appalled as we are.
7
posted on
08/22/2009 3:49:12 PM PDT
by
Paradox
(ObamaCare = Logan's Run ; There is no Sanctuary!)
To: All
8
posted on
08/22/2009 4:03:49 PM PDT
by
Cindy
To: Paradox
So when will the average Scot vote this kind of scum out of office?
Not to mention the Scottish scum living at 10 Downing.
9
posted on
08/22/2009 4:12:48 PM PDT
by
what's up
To: nickcarraway
Wife and daughter have just cancelled a 10 day trip into Glasgow and touring all around the highlands and outer isles because of this terrible act!
10
posted on
08/22/2009 4:22:35 PM PDT
by
B-Cause
(It's not what you gather, but what you scatter that tells what kind of life you have lived.)
To: nickcarraway
He condemned the move and said it must be made clear it was not done in the name of the Scottish people. Ah,excuse me.Was the final decision made by an individual who was elected by the Scottish people? Or by an individual who was appointed by someone who was elected by the Scottish people? If the answer to either question is "yes" then it was,at least,done in the name of the majority of the Scottish people.
To: nickcarraway
Looks like something our own traitor in chief would do!
Keep our own Kenyan Klown in mind when slamming the Scots.
12
posted on
08/22/2009 4:36:28 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(If you have a problem and If explosives are an option then explosives are THE answer.)
To: nickcarraway
13
posted on
08/22/2009 4:56:45 PM PDT
by
Electric Graffiti
(Yonder stands your orphan with his gun)
To: nickcarraway
I have to agree. There is no valid reason to release him and certainly don't see any Christian kindness releasing him.
In terms of justice, by my way of thinking, premeditated murder of someone means you get the death penalty and he killed a lot more than one, including killing the spirits, hopes, and life of many of those who lost someone thanks to his bombing. Releasing him only harms those who survived his taking the life of someone they loved. Where's the Christian kindness in that?
He should have died in a Scottish cell asking his God to forgive him. Instead, he gets a hero's welcome home and the embrace of those who love him. Either the judge is an evil bastard or he believes the convicted bomber is innocent.
14
posted on
08/22/2009 5:08:51 PM PDT
by
GBA
To: nickcarraway
Three reasons for the UK, of which Scotland is a part, to do this......
1. OIL
2. OIL
3. OIL.
15
posted on
08/22/2009 5:12:54 PM PDT
by
wtc911
("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
To: nickcarraway
He condemned the move and said it must be made clear it was not done in the name of the Scottish people. Err, well sorry Mr McConnell, but I'm afraid that it WAS done in the name of the Scottish people. You can't backtrack out of that responsibility because its turned out to be an incredibly unpopular (and stupid) decision.
16
posted on
08/22/2009 5:44:42 PM PDT
by
Vanders9
To: skeeter
I remain sceptical. I think a deal has been done.
17
posted on
08/22/2009 5:45:26 PM PDT
by
Vanders9
To: B-Cause
Come to England instead! We don’t have midges, the scenery is just as lovely and, amazingly, the food is better :)
18
posted on
08/22/2009 5:46:55 PM PDT
by
Vanders9
To: Gay State Conservative
Ah,excuse me.Was the final decision made by an individual who was elected by the Scottish people? Or by an individual who was appointed by someone who was elected by the Scottish people? If the answer to either question is "yes" then it was,at least,done in the name of the majority of the Scottish people. That is not true. Just because you elect someone doesn't mean their every act is done in your name. Are you saying that if the frickin' dimwits pass their health care bill over the wish of the people it is done in the people's name simply because these POS were elected? Your reasoning is very faulty. The scots were raising he** about this before the terrorist slime ball was released, how does that equate to "being done in their name"?
19
posted on
08/22/2009 6:01:55 PM PDT
by
calex59
To: calex59
That is not true. Just because you elect someone doesn't mean their every act is done in your name. If this is an elected official or someone appointed by an elected official then that official's act is ultimately the responsibility of the electorate.
Are you saying that if the frickin' dimwits pass their health care bill over the wish of the people it is done in the people's name simply because these POS were elected?
Yup.Given that the majority of voters voted for Hussein they (the majority) will be getting just what they deserved.
Words have consequences.Actions have consequences.Votes have consequences.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson