Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fake Obama Kenya birth certificate?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18018714/Fake-Obama-Kenya-birth-certificate ^ | 08/02/2009

Posted on 08/02/2009 4:56:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

And then one of our moderators spotted this:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18018714/Fake-Obama-Kenya-birth-certificate

It has several clues, but also there's this question:

Who is E. F. Lavender?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=earth+friendly+lavender&aq=f&oq=&aqi

Earth Friendly Lavender detergent?


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allahpundit; areyouseries; article2section1; bc; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; charlesjohnson; citizenship; edmorrissey; eligibility; fake; hawaii; hillary; hoax; honolulu; hotair; indonesia; ineligible; kenya; lgf; littlegreenfootballs; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; pumas; republicofkenya; taitz; thisishugh; usurper; waitforit; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,061-1,0801,081-1,1001,101-1,120 ... 1,181-1,190 next last
To: mamelukesabre

you manufacture the physical item first then photgraph it

like an art comp


1,081 posted on 08/03/2009 5:06:53 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1077 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
Plausible alternate notion, someone was paid to favricate a fake 1964 document to play misdirection at a time when desperately needed. Connecting recent events, this exhibit arrives just days after an official in Hawaii makes outlandish assertions she cannot possibly assert legally, and she has revealed what she claims is data in Vital Records which is protected by privacy which she breached.

It may all be a well funded misdirection campaign.

1,082 posted on 08/03/2009 5:08:51 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1076 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Seems to me that if you can identify one of them as legit, then you are well on your way figuring out who the crooked SOB is that faked the other one.

Right?


1,083 posted on 08/03/2009 5:09:21 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1080 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Either that or you actually had the physical original in your hands.

Right? See where I’m going with this?


1,084 posted on 08/03/2009 5:10:28 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1081 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

yeah...I think


1,085 posted on 08/03/2009 5:11:47 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1084 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

And if something looks too good to be true — it probably is.


1,086 posted on 08/03/2009 5:13:17 PM PDT by Ronin (It will be helpful if Geithner can show us some arithmetic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1076 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Yup, and I see LIGHTNING! Yes, we have Zots!


1,087 posted on 08/03/2009 5:17:40 PM PDT by piytar (Take back the language: Obama axing Chrystler dealers based on political donations is REAL fascism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 991 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce
Kenya Independence was declared on 12/12/63. The Republic was official on 12/12/64.

That's what we've been saying all along.

Someone on the TopSecret blog gave proof that there are gov’t documents with both the crest AND ‘Republic of Kenya’ on the documents during this transition period. It makes sense that they’d have both.

It doesn't make sense to me that they would have "republic of kenya" on official document header and seal 10 months before they became a republic, but I'll take a look at your source later. It certainly would dramatically change the likelihood in my mind that the document is valid if this is true. Sounds exciting.

Now Mount, you’ve said the ‘original 1963 [Kenyan] constitution doesn’t have the word Republic in it.’ What are the relative dates of these two Kenyan Constitutional documents? They both are dated in 1963: http://www.constitutionnet.org/files/Kenyan%20constitution%20amended%202008.pdf http://www.constitutionnet.org/files/KEL63-002.pdf

No, the second document is dated 2008. Look at the second line, it says amended 2008.

Just a hint, Kenya didn't have a president in 1963, the queen of england was the head of state. If you doubt what I am saying I can show you an official kenyan governmental website that proves this historical fact. If the constitution you are looking at calls for a president, then you are not looking at a 1963 constitution. Kenya did not have a president until Dec 12th 1964, when they became a republic.


1,088 posted on 08/03/2009 5:26:22 PM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 951 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

You said — Someone took a lot of trouble to create this document. Orly says she received it anonymously. Well now that it has been exposed as a fraud, I don’t think she is under any obligation to keep his name a secret. On top of that, she may be able to sue the creator for the costs of going to England.

Ummmm...., you might try “Lucas Smith”.... :-)

From an earlier post of mine on this item.


‘Birth certificate’ seller vanishes into thin air
Dubious eBay character dodges agent, lawyer, verification team
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104495

WND also launched an investigation into “colmado_naranja,” which led through several online aliases and reported collaborators, including Dawnella Wilson, “InspectorSmith” and, eventually, Lucas Smith, a former resident of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, who still claims to have possession of the document.

...

“I’m going to have to meet with my attorney before we can go any further,” Smith told WND in a phone interview. “I’d rather have a middle man go between WorldNetDaily and myself.”

Smith did then authorize a public relations agent to speak on his behalf and hire an attorney, but after several unsuccessful attempts to get Smith to offer any proof of the document’s authenticity, the agent has since withdrawn his representation, fearing that the alleged birth certificate sale may have merely been a money-grabbing fraud.

The agent, Sean Boyer, is a Pennsylvania businessman who contacted Smith through eBay. He told WND his goal was simply to help bring the alleged document into the light for possible verification.

WND negotiated with Boyer on how best to coax further information from Smith and worked behind the scenes to prepare processes for authenticating or disproving any document Smith might produce.

“The Obama birth certificate that I listed on eBay was not a hoax. I repeat, NOT A HOAX,” Smith insisted.

When pressed to produce evidence of his claims, however, Smith told WND in an email, “I won’t be bullied into posting a video. I won’t adhere to any time deadline.”
“I stated I wa
s going to make a video and then go to WND and Joseph Farah, but I never gave a timeline for that,” Smith told WND over the phone. “In retrospect, I shouldn’t have mentioned that.”

Smith’s hesitancy to cooperate eventually cost him the support of his agent and lawyer, too.

“Smith has broken promise after promise to deliver on his claims,” Boyer told WND.

“On Sunday, July 19, it had been five days without a response from Smith, after a number of attempts had been made to contact him by email and phone messages,” Boyer said. “Smith may be stalling for time as he attempts to sell whatever he may have privately through contacts that he told me he was able to develop while advertizing on eBay. Consequently, [Smith’s attorney] and I agreed to withdraw our representation of Smith, and he has been notified by email to that effect.”


Obama BC eBay seller bigtime scammer ( actually mentally ill it seems)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2284400/posts

(make sure to read all the links her, the guy is certifiably isane)

This person appears to be a big time scammer On July 2nd, 2009 salsero96 says: A fter searching for information on this person colmado_naranja on eBay, or Inspector Smith on Youtube...

It appears to be LUCAS SMITH as described in this photo on CBS news site: (you can compare his picture to the pictures on eBay)

http://www.cbsnews.com/2301-500142_162-4179689-1.html

If you search his name and city/state, you will get his address... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rlz=1R1GGGL_en___US319&um=1&q=%22Lucas%20Smith%22%20Cedar%20Rapids%2C%20Iowa&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=iw Lucas Smith (319) 362-0354 1626 5th Ave SE, Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
If you search for his address you will find a myspace page stating that the house has had sightings of the virgin mary and will be up for sale soon on eBay... http://www.myspace.com/houseforsalevirginmary

Here in that same myspace profile, you will find a picture displaying a similar ebay username:
http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&friendID=433779327&albumID=481404&imageID=3980456

Also, I ‘m not sure if this is the same person, but there was an incident here: http://blog.syracuse.com/news/2008/01/oswego_county_centerpiece_0116.html In late 2002, a man from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, sent an e-mail to the family. The man, who called himself Lucas Smith, said he was 23 years old and had emigrated from Russia five years earlier. He had seen the Web site and, Smith said, he wanted to help. The Wilsons stopped searching for a donor. Smith passed all of the medical, physical and psychological tests. They thought he was going to save their son’s life. Then, on May 3, 2003, Smith sent Jim Wilson Sr. an e-mail saying he wanted to be compensated for donating his kidney. Wilson said they would pay his airfare, but because it was illegal to receive money for an organ donation, they wouldn’t give him any other cash. Five months after holding out a lifeline, Lucas Smith disappeared.


Houses and Birth Certificates For Sale: At a Little Red and Orange Corner Store
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2284872/posts

For 6th time, eBay ‘birth certificate’ seller erased
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2284369/posts


1,089 posted on 08/03/2009 5:31:52 PM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1063 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

You just made my point, except that legally-speaking, he isn’t a “President elect” until Congress has ratified the electoral college results. Before that, he is of no title , just someone who “supposedly” won the election. If you claim to be the “President elect” and Congress decides otherwise when the electoral college results are ratified, then you, in fact, are not, and never was “the President elect”.

Once you become, legally, the President elect, you still must “qualify” before being allowed to ascend to the office of President. That can only mean one thing, meet qualification standards for the office of President which include eligibility requirements.


A President-Elect “qualifies” by not assuming room temperature before Inauguration Day and being able to take the Oath of Office on Inauguration Day.
Determining a candidate’s eligibility to compete for Electoral votes is the responsibility of each state. In most states, its the responsiblity of the state level Secretary of State.


1,090 posted on 08/03/2009 5:33:07 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1079 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

I hope someone is still going to try to figure out if the david jeffry bc is authentic. Someone could’ve tampered with that one too.


1,091 posted on 08/03/2009 5:36:20 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1085 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Looking.
See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?q=1&;page=5856#5856


1,092 posted on 08/03/2009 5:43:40 PM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1091 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

All by design, to make conservatives/republicans etc. look “racist”, “bigoted”, etc.

Time to follow the trail backwards and see where it leads...my money is on the WH and the Puppetmaster Soros!!


1,093 posted on 08/03/2009 5:44:22 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1070 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce
I see. There are two versions linked below. The earlier version, apparently circa 12-1963 (based on dates in the text of the document), that doesn’t refer to ‘Republic’ and a later version, which is dated 1963 in the title, and which *does* refer to ‘Republic.’ My very clear question is when did the second document, without its amendments, get written? It seems logical that since it was dated 1963, it was originally written in 1963 - something of a second draft. I’m speculating, of course, and I asked others their opinion - still allowed by you?

http://www.constitutionnet.org/files/KEL63-002.pdf
http://www.constitutionnet.org/en/vl/constitution-republic-kenya-1963-amended-2008

Specifically how have a I posted inaccurate information?

I'll be as succinct as possible. The second document that you listed is the 2008 version of the constitution. The presence of "1963" means that the constitution dates back originally to 1963, not that it's a 1963 version. The page you listed and the document itself clearly state "as Amended to 2008".

To answer your question "when did the second document, without its amendments, get written?" you'd have to compare every version of the constitution. Apparently, there was a major reorganization at some point. Do I think it happened in 1963? No. Two reasons: (1) because it's highly unlikely that two constitutions would be published in 20 days (12-12-63(independence) to 12-31-63(last day of year)); and (2) the statement "Kenya is a sovereign Republic" (p.8 of your second listed document) would have been invalid prior to 12-12-64, and no amendment to that statement is given in the text.

Finally, the argument is moot regarding the validity of the BC. Even if Kenya was not a Republic when the BC was allegedly produced, some bureaucrat might have prematurely put it on his forms.

1,094 posted on 08/03/2009 5:47:31 PM PDT by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 982 | View Replies]

To: PleaDeal

You are confusing “citizen” with “natural born citizen”. Offspring of illegals born in the US are (unfortunately) citizens, but not natural born citizens.


1,095 posted on 08/03/2009 5:51:45 PM PDT by ducdriver (judica me, Deus, et discerne causam meam de gente non sancta. (Ps. 42))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 802 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Your opinion does not make a person the “President elect”. Congressional ratification of the electoral college results does that. Your opinion doesn’t get rid of the term “or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify.” There is only a President elect AFTER ratification, not before. Avoid these points all you want. I’ll take my argument in court.


1,096 posted on 08/03/2009 6:07:59 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1090 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I haven’t followed this fake birth cert. thread in any depth. Why is this a nail in the coffin?


1,097 posted on 08/03/2009 6:14:41 PM PDT by xzins (Chaplain Says: Jesus befriends all who ask Him for help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1063 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Your response misrepresents my comments, insofar as I indicated Wong Kim Ark, 1898 did not contribute to a definition of the term, “natural born citizen”, as used in the Constitution.

Barack Hussein has already publicly acknowledged he was born with a natural born allegiance to the sovereign of the United Kingdom of Great Britain. Suggestions that Wong Kim Ark, 1898 has or ever can effect a change to the meaning of “natural born citizen” is a false argument and a red herring. The intent of John Jay, George Washington, and Congress was crystal clear. No person born with an allegiance to a foreign sovereign can lawfully serve as Commander-in-Chief of the United States.


1,098 posted on 08/03/2009 6:21:26 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 938 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

was just about to post this too...


1,099 posted on 08/03/2009 6:23:19 PM PDT by vikk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Maybe she’s learning that she should fact-check a little more closely?


1,100 posted on 08/03/2009 6:26:15 PM PDT by vikk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1072 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,061-1,0801,081-1,1001,101-1,120 ... 1,181-1,190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson