Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/31/2009 9:28:00 AM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: John Jorsett

I’m very sorry to hear that. I wish him well. It’s helpful that he has an excellent health package.


2 posted on 07/31/2009 9:29:30 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

I don’t wish that on him, my hope for him was that he would spend the rest of his life sharing a jail cell with Barney Frank.


3 posted on 07/31/2009 9:30:58 AM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

Less than 1 in 8 men who have prostate cancer die of prostate cancer.

Are they gonna pull a toricelli since he can’t win reelection?


4 posted on 07/31/2009 9:33:07 AM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

SO why this announcement? For sympathy in preparation for a re-election run?


6 posted on 07/31/2009 9:33:51 AM PDT by FreepShop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

He can rest up in his Irish cottage after we retire him.


8 posted on 07/31/2009 9:34:57 AM PDT by Sir Gawain ("Scalp dem and hang dem up high" - Super Cat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

While that sucks for him, my only wish is that they pass health care reform WITHOUT the EXEMPTION for themselves. It would be the ultimate irony that the thing deemed to save the serfs, dooms the oligarchs.


9 posted on 07/31/2009 9:35:10 AM PDT by fightinbluhen51 ("MOLON LABE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

Sympathy ploy or the seeding (NPI) of a reason to withdraw from public life? After all, he has a great retirement home.


11 posted on 07/31/2009 9:35:41 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (if the government makes trading a used car this hard how are they going to handle a doctor visit?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

Prayers he gets better while in prison.


13 posted on 07/31/2009 9:36:03 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

While I don’t think very much of Christopher Dodd as a human being, I would not wish that on anyone.

Prayers for him and his family.


16 posted on 07/31/2009 9:36:34 AM PDT by sauropod (People who do things are people that get things done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

Can we send him to Canada for treatment, I hear they have a really good success rate for treating cancer. Canada’s heath care system is the best in the world. Or so I have been told over and over again.


17 posted on 07/31/2009 9:38:05 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

At his age (65), it is likely not life-threatening, especially since they caught it early. It’s younger men getting it that they worry most about.

My only question is, “Does that mean he won’t run again — or is he just setting the stage to appeal for sympathy votes?”


21 posted on 07/31/2009 9:39:43 AM PDT by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

This should not bother Dodd. He has promoted death for over 50 million Americans. If it’s been good enough for 50 million babies, it’s good enough for him. I will expend sympather elsewhere. It is preposterous to pretend to be mournful when mass-murdering tyrants fall ill or die.


24 posted on 07/31/2009 9:40:17 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

NHS U-turn on prostate cancer treatment

By Laura Donnelly, Health Correspondent
Published: 12:01AM GMT 16 Dec 2007

A life-saving treatment will be denied to tens of thousands of victims of Britain’s most common male cancer after a U-turn by the NHS rationing body.

NHS’s disservice to those with prostate cancer
Xeloda pill is new breast cancer hope
Have your say: Should cancer patients be denied this treatment?
The groundbreaking ultrasound therapy has been shown to kill nine out of 10 prostate tumours, and five years after treatment, 80 per cent of patients show no sign of the cancer recurring.

Related Articles
How a fruit punch may limit cancer Compared with surgery or conventional radiotherapy treatment, it is not invasive and is far less likely to lead to devastating side effects such as impotence or incontinence.

Suitable for treatment in the early stages of the disease, when it is not known how quickly it will spread, the ultrasound therapy is regarded by doctors as a vital new weapon in the battle against prostate cancer.

The UK’s most prevalent cancer among men, prostate cancer kills 10,000 a year, with 35,000 more cases diagnosed annually. A third of men over 50 contract it.

Three years ago, the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice) said men across the country should be offered the treatment, called High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (Hifu), free on the NHS.

But The Sunday Telegraph has learnt that Nice has now decided to reverse that decision. In the New Year, the controversial rationing body will massively restrict the use of the HIFU treatment.

Instead of it being available to all prostate cancer sufferers, it will now be restricted only to those who have already failed to respond to conventional treatment and whose cancer has returned.

The decision, set to be made in February, means Hifu will not be available to the vast majority of prostate cancer sufferers.

Cancer charities and senior doctors last night attacked the move as a U-turn.

Mark Emberton, a consultant urologist at University College Hospital, London, said he was worried that patients would be forced into the private sector, “which would be a disaster”, if they wanted the treatment.

He also questioned the logic of only offering Hifu to men whose cancer had returned, while denying it to patients in the early stages of the disease.

Meanwhile, Stephen Brown, a consultant urologist at Stepping Hill hospital, Stockport, said: “We think Hifu is a really good option for patients who want a lesser procedure.”

Prof Roger Kirby, who chairs the Prostate UK charity, also decried the decision. He said: “Restricting the treatments available will have a massive impact on the patient.”

Since Nice made its original ruling, permitting the use of Hifu, just 300 men have been given the treatment on the NHS.

Primary care trusts have so far been slow to foot the bill for the treatment, which is one-off but costs about £13,000.

This amount compares with £3,000 for radiotherapy, which takes six weeks, and £5,000 for surgery.

It is understood that Nice, which has refused to comment on its new guidelines, will rule that there is insufficient evidence to prove that Hifu has long-term value.

The U-turn comes despite the research published last month in the European Journal of Urology which found that eight out of 10 men were healthy five years after being treated with Hifu.


26 posted on 07/31/2009 9:42:47 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

I hope he is healed, but I also hope that a fresh reminder of his mortality leads to repentance,


28 posted on 07/31/2009 9:43:10 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (We're definitely in the Rise of the Empire era, but is Obama Valorum or Palpatine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

May God bless him and his family.


29 posted on 07/31/2009 9:44:57 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Texan. Monarchist. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett; Dr. Eckleburg; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; enat

Early stage prostate is very curable I’m hearing on the news.

Therefore, this could also could become a “wag the dog” over Dodd’s calling tens of thousands in bribes that he received a mere “courtesy.”


30 posted on 07/31/2009 9:46:11 AM PDT by xzins (Chaplain Says: Jesus befriends all who ask Him for help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

How old is Dodd?? How much is the treatment going to cost?? Is it worth it to save an old man whose life is nearing an end when untold millions have no health insurance?? Questions Obamacare will ask.

Oh, never mind. Members of Congress won’t be covered by Obamacare and aren’t subject to its limitations on care for senior citizens.

Though I certainly hope Dodd can overcome the cancer, it is, as Obama would say, a “teachable moment” to the public. The Senator will have care not always available to ordinary citizens if the Obama/Pelosi health care legislation is passed.


31 posted on 07/31/2009 9:46:31 AM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

This Connecticut native is sorry Dodd is ill. And, this Connecticut native hopes that Dodd takes this illness as a sign to step down and ‘spend more time with his family’. Because, if he doesn’t, this Connecticut native hopes that Dodd is a). trounced in his reelection bid, or b). gets hauled off to jail for being a low-life POS.


33 posted on 07/31/2009 9:48:25 AM PDT by joejm65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

Great News!!!!Put him on the new and improved obummercare program. He will live long and prosper!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well, maybe. Better to send in the deathcare specialists.


36 posted on 07/31/2009 9:50:17 AM PDT by US_MilitaryRules ("We live in an amazing, amazing world, and it's wasted on the crappiest generation of spoiled idiots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

So, like Kennedy, we can’t criticize him anymore. There is no level of sleaze Dems won’t stoop too. He is a bad guy who did bad things. That doesn’t change with a malignant glioma..


38 posted on 07/31/2009 9:52:38 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Dont Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson