Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Under the radar: 10th Amendment Movement Picks up Steam
Examiner.com ^ | 7/19/09 | Nancy Morgan

Posted on 07/19/2009 6:52:52 AM PDT by NoobRep

Millions of Americans watch with horror as the Obama administration continues to implement its own version of 'change.' Change that involves an unprecedented and systematic devolution of power to the federal government, in direct contravention of the Constitution.

From the pending takeover of 17% of economy under the auspices of health care reform, to the government takeover and subsequent ownership of automobile companies, to the unconstitutional interference in the formerly private market under the rubric of stimulating the economy. Not to mention the proposed cap and trade legislation which would give the federal government unlimited powers of taxation and regulation under the guise of saving the planet.

Totally ignored by elected officials of both parties is the tenth amendment of the Constitution, which states very clearly, "The power not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Many Americans don't agree with the left's idea of a 'living constitution', arguing that the intent of the founders should govern the interpretation and application of the Constitution, not the whimsical and politically motivated present day politicians. And, largely unreported by the media, they are starting to stand up to the federal government.

To date, 37 states have introduced sovereignty resolutions, asserting their state's sovereign rights under the tenth amendment.

Earlier this month, Louisiana became the seventh state, joining Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Oklahoma, Idaho and Tennessee to officially adopt a resolution affirming their sovereignty. These states are putting the federal government on notice that politicians in Washington do not have the right, under the Constitution, to continue to impose their increasingly onerous federal mandates on sovereign states.

Some states, with Arizona leading the way, are going a step further.

Under Arizona's Health Care Freedom Act, which was passed by the Arizona state legislature this month, a voting initiative will be placed on the 2010 ballot that, if passed, will allow Arizona to opt out of any federal health care plan.

Following Arizona's lead, five other states -- Indiana, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota and Wyoming -- are considering similar initiatives to opt out of federal health care for their 2010 ballots This, even before Congress has created the program.

Arizona is also preparing for the misnamed 'climate' bill, that passed the House this month. (With eight Republican votes.) The Arizona state Senate voted 19-10 to approve a bill banning the Department of Environmental Quality from enacting or enforcing measures with language pertaining to climate change.

Other states are stepping up to the plate and asserting their state's sovereign right under the second amendment - a right that guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

On July 6, Florida introduced the Firearms Freedom Act which seeks to provide "that specified firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition for personal use manufactured in state are not subject to federal law or regulation" in the State of Florida.

Increasingly, the representatives 'we the people' have elected to preserve and protect our rights, are ignoring the clear, unequivocal language of the Constitution. Our politicians seem unaware of the fact that the Constitution does not include congressional power to override state laws.

In fact, the power our representatives are now accruing to the federal government was expressly voted down, not once, but several times.

During the Constitutional ratification process, James Madison drafted the 'Virginia Plan' which advocated a strong federal government. It proposed, among other things, giving Congress legislative authority, and a veto over state laws. Each of Madison's proposals was soundly defeated. Our founders clear intent was vesting all powers in the states, with but a few, listed exceptions.

Ever since 1938, when FDR used the occasion of the great depression to drastically expand the scope of federal government (Wickard vs Filburn) using an absurd reading of the Commerce Clause, this unconstitutional taking of power by the central government has gone virtually unchallenged. Until now.

Though the media has ignored these efforts, 'we the people' are starting to fight back, via our state and local representatives.

Politicians need to be reminded that our Constitution is still in effect. And Americans need to be reminded that just because some believe the trendy notion that our Constitution is a 'living, breathing' document, doesn't make it so.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 10th; 10thamendment; 2ndamendment; bho44; bhodoj; billofrights; constitution; donttreadonme; endthefed; holder; liberty; obama; secondamendment; statesrights; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
Very positive direction the states are taking. Arizona is definitely taking the lead here. I contacted my state senator in Nebraska and he is probably going to bring a measure up soon.

Imagine if Arizona told the Federal loons and Obama to go stick cap and trade where the sun doesn't shine.

1 posted on 07/19/2009 6:52:53 AM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

Bookmark


2 posted on 07/19/2009 6:54:54 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

“Arizona is also preparing for the misnamed ‘climate’ bill, that passed the House this month. (With eight Republican votes.) The Arizona state Senate voted 19-10 to approve a bill banning the Department of Environmental Quality from enacting or enforcing measures with language pertaining to climate change.”

AZ bump!


3 posted on 07/19/2009 6:55:38 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
The Arizona state Senate voted 19-10 to approve a bill banning the Department of Environmental Quality from enacting or enforcing measures with language pertaining to climate change.”

Fantastic step in the right direction.

4 posted on 07/19/2009 6:57:50 AM PDT by HerrBlucher (All we are saying, is show the BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep
>Under the radar: 10th Amendment Movement Picks up Steam

"Under the radar"
is the key phrase here. The test
for this agenda

will be how it fares
if the mainstream media
gives it the spotlight,

if the talking heads
on TV give the topic
a daily mention.
5 posted on 07/19/2009 7:01:04 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Since most of the statists in Washington won’t listen, take your fight to the local level. Arizona isn’t looking like too bad of a place to live right now.


6 posted on 07/19/2009 7:01:42 AM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep
Another good way to help the local sovereignty movement would be to send this man's book, "County Sheriff: America's Last Hope, to your sheriff. It describes how the county sheriff is the people's last line of defense against enemies, including the feds.
7 posted on 07/19/2009 7:04:51 AM PDT by Rodebrecht (If everybody just left everybody else alone, everybody would be a lot happier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodebrecht

States rights vs the federal government are one of the most important protections written into the Constitution by our founders. They understood that a centralized all-powerful tyrannical government is the most dangerous entity on the face of the Earth. It is a danger to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as written into our wonderful, way-ahead-of-its-time and highly intelligent Constitution.


8 posted on 07/19/2009 7:08:55 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

Imagine conservatives populating a dozens states, throwing out the leftists, illegals, etc and telling the federal government to go to hell. I’ve a feeling the population of those several states would grow exponentially over a very short period of time!


9 posted on 07/19/2009 7:10:40 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

Bttt.


10 posted on 07/19/2009 7:11:27 AM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (Markets and Marxists Don't Mix! Smile you're on Janet's Candid Camera!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

No question. The productive citizens and the businesses would all flock to where the government is least intrusive.


11 posted on 07/19/2009 7:13:46 AM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

the left wants a “living” constitution,

meanwhile,

they’re killing children.


12 posted on 07/19/2009 7:18:11 AM PDT by ken21 (i am not voting for a rino-progressive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

If they want to alter the Constitution there are guidelines for doing it. They’ve made their own method of transforming our rules so we are no longer a rule of law but a rule of communist thugs and dictators.


13 posted on 07/19/2009 7:20:10 AM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V1nmn2zRMc


14 posted on 07/19/2009 7:22:40 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

Arizona will have all federal dollars withheld until they fall back into line. It is something the federal government has done for years. I remember a state that wanted to keep the drinking age 18 but the federal government said fine and did not send the state a dime for a year. The following year the drinking age was 21. There is not one single state in our U.S. that can stand on their own without federal funds. The federal government has the states in their hands and they know it.


15 posted on 07/19/2009 7:22:47 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

To date, 37 states have introduced sovereignty resolutions, asserting their state’s sovereign rights under the tenth amendment.

How many states are going to step up like Arizona? I have said earlier that the states are the key to stopping this man and his minions.

Are they going to refuse funding from the feds?


16 posted on 07/19/2009 7:24:38 AM PDT by waxer1 ( "The Bible is the rock on which our republic rests." -Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep
This movement needs to go much further to be effective. Federal agents need to be arrested for entering a county without prior approval of local law enforcement; Federal taxes should be paid to the state to be redistributed to the Federal government if determined appropriate by the state; Federal climate and energy laws must be subject to state re-determination, Federal court decisions must be sharply circumscribed by state law, etc. In short, except for originalist constitutional functions, the state must be primary or this movement may feel good but it won't have significant impact.
17 posted on 07/19/2009 7:24:54 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

“Arizona isn’t looking like too bad of a place to live right now”

Why I left California after having lived there 30 years. Moved to Arizona in 2006.


18 posted on 07/19/2009 7:25:41 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Yeah but this bad economy may change that. The feds cant help the states without going into deeper debt and the feds know it. Furthermore any help the states get from the feds will never be enough because the states will just spend it and get further into debt by their insane eternal spending vicious circle. The feds know that too - all too well.


19 posted on 07/19/2009 7:26:00 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Yeah but this bad economy may change that. The feds cant help the states without going into deeper debt and the feds know it. Furthermore any help the states get from the feds will never be enough because the states will just spend it and get further into debt by their insane eternal spending vicious circle. The feds know that too - all too well.


20 posted on 07/19/2009 7:26:19 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson