Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minnesota Man Sentenced for Producing Child Pornography (360 Months)
Department of Justice ^ | July 16, 2009 | United States Attorney’s Office District of Minnesota

Posted on 07/17/2009 6:12:53 PM PDT by Larry381

A 43-year-old Sartell man was sentenced today in federal court to producing child pornography.

On July 16 in St. Paul, United States District Court Judge Donovan Frank sentenced Dennis Michael Lemke to 360 months in prison and supervised release for life on one count of production of child pornography. Lemke was indicted on July 14, 2008, and pleaded guilty on Jan. 16.

According to Lemke’s plea agreement, he admitted that on April 12, 2006, he did knowingly employ, use, persuade, induce, entice and coerce a minor who was then under the age of 12 to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing visual depictions of such conduct.

According to a Federal Bureau of Investigation affidavit, a search warrant was executed at Lemke’s then St. Cloud residence and authorities seized a computer, electronic storage media and a digital camera. An examination of the computer resulted in the discovery of a large number of sexually explicit images of children. Police also determined that some of the images were taken by the type of digital camera seized at the Lemke residence, and several of the images featured Lemke.

This case was the result of an investigation by the St. Cloud Police Department and the FBI. It was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Nathan P. Petterson.

This case is part of Project Safe Childhood (PSC), a national initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by United States Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, PSC marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about PSC, visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: childpornography; fbi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Larry381
According to the Star Tribune, his former wife ran a day care center. He also faces state charges in the abuse of some two-year-old girls.
21 posted on 07/17/2009 7:52:35 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I find it disturbing that this is encouraged in little kids.

Yep, I saw a little girl probably 7 or 8 years old with "Sweet Cheeks" plastered across the seat of her short shorts.

Real cute huh.

22 posted on 07/17/2009 9:21:02 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JCG
Eff off DU troll.

Oh, you read his short posting history too. Looks and smells like one to me.

23 posted on 07/17/2009 9:23:54 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58; JCG

His account just ran into Post 3 above.


24 posted on 07/17/2009 9:27:02 PM PDT by decal ("In the long run, we are all Jim Thompson." -- John Maynard Keynes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58; GSP.FAN

>> Yep, I saw a little girl probably 7 or 8 years old with “Sweet Cheeks” plastered across the seat of her short shorts.

Real cute huh. <<

Like GSP implied, women (and I use the term guardedly) think that hypersexualization of children is normal and to be encouraged.

There are lines that should not be crossed and “sweet cheeks” on a 7 yo’s seat is on the wrong side of that line. It is child abuse, pure and simple.

Worse, it is theft of the innocence of what a child should retain as long as possible. This is a theft of something that can never be returned.


25 posted on 07/17/2009 10:28:24 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Larry381
Then sentence should have been "Death", with only 3 months for appeals.

Better yet, no appeals!

26 posted on 07/17/2009 10:57:02 PM PDT by Hillarys nightmare (So Proud to be living in "Jesus Land" ! Don't you wish everyone did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; stockpirate
It just struck me -- in addition to the resemblance, they're both "on the bench"...

Cheers!

27 posted on 07/18/2009 5:50:38 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon

I think it depends to some extent upon whether the jurisdiction in question has a determinate or indeterminate sentencing system. Under Minnesota’s determinate sentencing system, the offender must serve 2/3 of the announced sentence, without exception. Many jurisdictions pronounce an “indeterminate” sentence which usually sounds exceedingly tough, but then the parole/pardons board has the authority to consider parole long before expiration of the pronounced sentence.

It is difficult to make comparisons between jurisdictions with different sentencing formulations.


28 posted on 07/18/2009 9:10:27 AM PDT by rot.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson