Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Yesterday the cops shot a bear. WGHP had a poll, and the majority of the respondents said, "They should have used a tranquilizer."

So the cops addressed that.

This is a very interesting dilemna.

Should we protect wildlife even when it threatens us?

1 posted on 07/15/2009 5:51:31 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HIDEK6

“”The bear was not retreating,” said Police Chief Scott Cunningham. “(It was) standing its ground and (it) turned and made face-to-face contact with the officer and was making appropriate animal noises.”

Appropriate animal noises? Police speak for bear grunting and growling. LOL ...


2 posted on 07/15/2009 5:54:02 AM PDT by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6

If that bear was being attacked I don’t blame it for shooting, and I don’t blame the police for defending it.


3 posted on 07/15/2009 5:54:07 AM PDT by csmusaret (If you like this economy, keep voting for Donkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blue Jays

Sometimes real guns are the best tool for the situation, not tranquilizer guns.


4 posted on 07/15/2009 5:54:24 AM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6; All

I believe we should go out of our way as our lives are intruding on their habitat.

(And no, that is not sarcasm)

These clowns usually have a “shoot first, ask questions later” mentality even when nobody is threatened.


5 posted on 07/15/2009 5:55:25 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6

This was the fourth police call in two days for this bear. The cops were tired of chasing around town after it, easier to shoot it and wait several more years for the next bear to wander into town.


7 posted on 07/15/2009 5:59:45 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Obama--POtuS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6

I never would have imagined a bear being in that region of the state!!


9 posted on 07/15/2009 6:00:25 AM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6
Someone say something about shooting bare?


10 posted on 07/15/2009 6:04:00 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6
Good episode of "Cops" - a fat, shirtless bear in your backyard...going through your trash. A short foot pursuit into the woods followed by shots. I guess the only thing missing was a round of nightstick clubbings :)

"When good bears go bad"

13 posted on 07/15/2009 6:06:49 AM PDT by IrishPennant (RLT = Radical Left Terrorism...feel it????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6

I guess I would get a little cranky if someone shot me while eating dinner.


14 posted on 07/15/2009 6:21:04 AM PDT by carton253 (Ask me about Throw Away the Scabbard - a Civil War alternate history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6

Frtom the piece:
He said he a bear at two different times Monday.

&&&
Was that when he be smokin’ weed?


15 posted on 07/15/2009 6:31:56 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Palin in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6
Should we protect wildlife even when it threatens us?

Ok, where are the bite and scratch marks. The last I heard most cops spoke dumb, but not to much bear.

16 posted on 07/15/2009 6:34:18 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6
I fail to see an issue in police shooting an aggressive, problem bear. It appears that the police took a very contemplative approach. Those desiring the expensive tranquilizer approach should obviously be taxed more.
17 posted on 07/15/2009 6:36:53 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6

I have no problem with the police shooting a nuisance bruin. The only problem I have is that any private citizen would have been arrested and heavily fined for having done the same thing.


20 posted on 07/15/2009 6:46:00 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6
This is a very interesting dilemma....
Should we protect wildlife even when it threatens us?

Interesting? Not at all....
Easy? Heck yes. If wildlife threatens us, it should immediately be eliminated.

One way or another...

Last I heard, humans are significantly more important than "wildlife".

21 posted on 07/15/2009 7:42:11 AM PDT by China Clipper (My favorite animals usually are found next to the rice on my plate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6
...and was making appropriate animal noises."

LOL...uhhh...okaaay!

22 posted on 07/15/2009 7:42:37 AM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HIDEK6

I am 48 yo and have never known of bears in this area ever. However last year or the year before there was one found up a tree on Main street here. The trees there aren’t large (20’ maybe?) the rangers got it down by tranquilizing it but I have no idea what they did with it. We keep hearing of people spotting them now so apparently we ave bears again here in SE Ohio?


27 posted on 07/15/2009 11:52:25 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson