Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin Attacks Obama in WaPo Op-ed, How Will Media Respond?
NewsBusters.com ^ | 07/14/2009 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 07/14/2009 4:51:33 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

If Palin Derangement Syndrome-afflicted media members thought the Alaska Governor's surprising pre-Fourth of July announcement meant she was getting out of politics, her op-ed in Tuesday's Washington Post should change their minds.

In a scathing rebuke of the Obama administration, Sarah Palin took off the gloves to attack the recently House-passed American Clean Energy and Security Act, disaffectionately known as cap-and-tax.

Marvelously, Palin also took a couple of jabs at her not so adoring press:

Unfortunately, many in the national media would rather focus on the personality-driven political gossip of the day than on the gravity of these challenges. So, at risk of disappointing the chattering class, let me make clear what is foremost on my mind and where my focus will be:

I am deeply concerned about President Obama's cap-and-trade energy plan, and I believe it is an enormous threat to our economy. It would undermine our recovery over the short term and would inflict permanent damage.

American prosperity has always been driven by the steady supply of abundant, affordable energy. Particularly in Alaska, we understand the inherent link between energy and prosperity, energy and opportunity, and energy and security. Consequently, many of us in this huge, energy-rich state recognize that the president's cap-and-trade energy tax would adversely affect every aspect of the U.S. economy.

There is no denying that as the world becomes more industrialized, we need to reform our energy policy and become less dependent on foreign energy sources. But the answer doesn't lie in making energy scarcer and more expensive! Those who understand the issue know we can meet our energy needs and environmental challenges without destroying America's economy.

Job losses are so certain under this new cap-and-tax plan that it includes a provision accommodating newly unemployed workers from the resulting dried-up energy sector, to the tune of $4.2 billion over eight years. So much for creating jobs.

In addition to immediately increasing unemployment in the energy sector, even more American jobs will be threatened by the rising cost of doing business under the cap-and-tax plan. For example, the cost of farming will certainly increase, driving down farm incomes while driving up grocery prices. The costs of manufacturing, warehousing and transportation will also increase.

The ironic beauty in this plan? Soon, even the most ardent liberal will understand supply-side economics.

Ouch! That's gonna leave a mark...likely on many of her detractors, assuming, of course, they get the joke.

That said, readers are encouraged to review the entire piece, and ponder just how this is going to play at Palin-hating media outlets the next 48 hours.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: bho44; capandtax; capandtrade; economy; energy; herecomethemittbots; justsaynotomitt; nomorerinos; obama; palin; palin2012; pds; sarahpalin; trueconservatism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 last
To: MuttTheHoople

Yeah...but most that read the Washington Compost are clueless libs...and I love the fact that they are reading this.


121 posted on 07/14/2009 9:08:14 AM PDT by Osage Orange (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

LOL, that’s beautiful!


122 posted on 07/14/2009 9:09:51 AM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kabar

If this is indeed true, she will have to explain that the “cap and trade” she supported bears no resemblance to the “cap & tax” that passed the house.


123 posted on 07/14/2009 9:13:58 AM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Something tells me Sarah has a fat file of editorials to be systematically released to the liberal press.


124 posted on 07/14/2009 9:17:26 AM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yooper4Life
Bottom line: the current cap and tax plan (and anything like it) must first be taken down, and then its faulty premises must be addressed.

_____________________________________

Agree 100%.

As to Sarah, it is my considered opinion that she is unelectable at the national level (WH). That is not to say that she would not be a better potus than the pos in residence, she would. But, her pre-mature resignation did her far more damage than her apostles are willing to (or able to) acknowledge.

125 posted on 07/14/2009 10:16:04 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

Perfect!!


126 posted on 07/14/2009 10:30:26 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Only time will tell.

She has the eye of a tiger. Don’t count her out.


127 posted on 07/14/2009 10:35:44 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Only time will tell.

She has the eye of a tiger. Don’t count her out.


128 posted on 07/14/2009 10:35:44 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Thanks for posting the “I do.I do.” in it’s full context.

As you say, Ifill tried to blindside her, but the totality of Sarah’s remarks make her position very clear.


129 posted on 07/14/2009 10:37:00 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

I do not mean that she lacks integrity or talent or ideas, It is my opinion that America will never elect her. A lot of good, thoughtful people just don’t like her.


130 posted on 07/14/2009 10:43:05 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

A lot can happen in 3 years. This is more than an eternity in politics. Don’t count her out. If we are still locked in a depression, we will win.


131 posted on 07/14/2009 10:47:34 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

“If we are still locked in a depression, we will win.”

Most of the “Stimulus” was desinged to make sure Democrats win in 2012.

Those ‘Shovel-Ready’ projects don’t even begin until the 2010-2011 cycle, so that Obama can claim “Success” when unemployment falls back under 10% in 2012.


132 posted on 07/14/2009 10:53:40 AM PDT by tcrlaf ("Hope" is the most Evil of all Evils"-Neitzsche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: EmilyGeiger
Don't forget that Sarah majored in journalism in the era before Fox when the leftists had a near monopoly. And yet, some people will continue to question her intelligence because she doesn't speak a second language, hasn't authored a major book, nor written an article for Foreign Affairs, the CFR periodical.
133 posted on 07/14/2009 10:56:38 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: steve8714
I’ve never seen this kind of humor from Kristol.

The humor is her signature.

134 posted on 07/14/2009 10:59:03 AM PDT by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Not cap and trade, just cap.

Thanks for checking on that, saving me some time, and proving me wrong. That was the response by Palin I had in mind.

135 posted on 07/14/2009 7:00:55 PM PDT by GoodDay (Palin for POTUS 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson