Posted on 07/11/2009 4:53:55 PM PDT by kristinn
The Daily Kos has a post up quoting MSNBC personality David Shuster's Twitter page stating his show will be covering the controversy over Free Republic and comments about Malia Obama:
@mikelord @thejoshuablog. We will cover this monday: http://bit.ly/3pqS7M. But follow @joetrippi for what can be done on-line. about 2 hours ago from web
The embedded link goes to the Vancouver Sun hit piece posted earlier to FR
Over at Twitter, the leftists are all in a hypocritical lather over FR.
David Shuster is on sometime mid-afternoon East Coast time Monday-Friday.
Okey dokey.
OK, from now on I’ll ping you every time I see an example, okay? (Must I do everyone’s work for them?)
We’ll have to disagree about Shoemaker and agree about attacks against children being off limits anywhere and anytime. It’s not something I would do or even contemplate.
Yep, O’Reilly will probably take a whack at us too.
Is any criticism fair, particularly of the parents who let her dress this way? Or is this dress just fine? Or are we obligated to ignore politically charged icons worn by 11 year old girls on official trips paid for by the taxpayers?
I was away when the American Chicken Footprint controversy began, so I hope I can add my comments here without causing David Poofter a case of the vapors.
The symbol on this little kid's tee shirt looked a little ragged, so I zoomed the image waaaay up to get a closer look.
From that close-up examination, it appears that Mommie Dearest, spends all the family wardrobe $$ on herself. The logo on that shirt looks like a cheap, boardwalk iron-on that is separating from the fabric after too many washings.
Really cheesy for a first daughter to be wearing on an official trip, but pretty much what I've come to expect from the Chicago mob now in residence at the White House.
Not-so-great representative of the American Girl.
Thanks for this informative post and #270.
You said you would have to dig through thousands of threads to find one. That makes such posts rare doesn’t it?
Then there were the "gay conservatives" ~ my goodness!!!!!
I don't think you've been around long enough to see the place "deteriorate" ~ no, hunh hunh, ain't no way.
We've seen the bottom a long time ago and it's actually gotten much better.
Absolutely, unless they can somehow be convinced that this hasn't anything at all to do with skin color, but rather Obama's and the other demonRat's treasonous left-wing politics.
MSLSD and the lefties said it was OK to attack the Palin children because Palin “paraded them” around in front of the country on TV at the RNC, yet if Obama has his kids running around Europe wearing T-Shirts with a political message they are off-limits?
Worse, the media blamed Palin for the attacks on her kids.
The girl is that picture! RACISM!
So then you WERE agreeing with me earlier! :) I wasn't sure.
That's what has the libtards nervous.
No, it means there are lots of threads every day on FR and I see an example of the kind of thread I’m talking about maybe 2 or 3 times a day, at the most. They are frequent enough to be an accepted part of FR (with usually many comments) but are not the kind of thing I want to spend the next few hours digging through the hundreds of daily threads to find. Like I said, if you’d like to stay on top of this kind of thing, I’ll ping you from now on.
:)
THANK you!!!!!!!!!!
;)
I disagree. Saquin is fact-driven, skeptical and consistent. The type of poster that often made me think when I first started lurking here in 2000. And sadly a lot of those posters are no longer here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.