Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Numbers Adding Up Against Obama's "Cap and Trade" Bill in the Senate
US News and World Report ^ | 7-7-09 | Peter Roff |

Posted on 07/07/2009 12:05:07 PM PDT by califamily4W

It was hard for the Democrats to get the 219 votes they needed to pass the "cap and trade" climate change bill in the U.S. House two weeks ago. Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, may have rolled the dice but, veteran Capitol Hillers say, it was only the intervention of President Barack Obama and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel that managed to close the deal.

They did it by pitching the vote as a referendum, at least internally, on Obama's presidency rather than on the underlying issue. No president likes to lose, least of all on a signature issue like the need to combat climate change, so the White House ratcheted up the stakes and, one presumes, took down names.

Of course the Democrats had help from eight Republicans, who are now on the receiving end of criticism of their own. It's gotten so thick, reports one senior Republican aide, the defecting GOPers are looking to members of the leadership to bail them out. Those requests have, thus far, fallen on deaf ears, the attitude being that those eight Republican "Aye" votes allowed eight potentially vulnerable Democrats to skate on what was, for them, a tough vote.

Now the bill heads to the U.S. Senate, where it may face an even tougher time, according to an analysis of the vote by Phil Kerpen, of the pro-taxpayer group Americans for Prosperity. Having crunched the numbers, Kerpen points out that out of 50 state delegations, 28 voted "No" and only 22 voted "Aye" on the House bill, and that more than a quarter of the votes in came from just two states: New York and California. Additionally:


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: capandtrade; crapandtax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: colorado tanker

And this is Rockefeller Republican leadership. Imagine the dutch they are in with actual conservatives.


21 posted on 07/07/2009 12:24:55 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Think of the D Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: califamily4W

bookmark


22 posted on 07/07/2009 12:29:18 PM PDT by upchuck (Psalm 109:8 ~ Let his days be few; and let another take his office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: califamily4W

Hopefully the 8 republicns who voted for this get lost in the primary’s
We dont need the likes of them.

I have no faith in the senate turning down cap and trade.

Asn an energy policy it plain sucks. The right energy policy would be nukes and clean coal and NOW.


23 posted on 07/07/2009 12:37:25 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore; All
California's financial crisis is partially to blame on a similar CRAP AND TRADE policy.

Rep. McClintock gave the following floor speech in opposition to the Cap and Trade legislation on June 26, 2009.

"I had a strange sense of Deja Vu as I watched the self-congratulatory rhetoric on the house floor tonight, and I feel compelled to offer this warning from the Left Coast.

Three years ago, I stood on the floor of the California Senate and watched a similar celebration over a similar bill, AB 32. And I have spend the last three years watching as that law has dangerously deepened California’s recession. It uses a different mechanism than Cap and Trade, but the objective is the same: to force a dramatic reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.

Up until that bill took effect, California’s unemployment numbers tracked very closely with the national unemployment rate. But then in January of 2007, California’s unemployment rate began a steady upward divergence from the national jobless figures. Today, California’s unemployment rate is more than two points above the national rate, and at its highest point since 1941.

What is it that happened in January of 2007? AB 32 took effect and began shutting down entire segments of California’s economy. Let me give you one example from my district. The City of Truckee, California was about to sign a long-term power contract to get its electricity from a new, EPA-approved coal-fired electricity plant in Utah. AB 32 and companion legislation caused them to abandon that contract. The replacement power they acquired literally doubled their electricity costs.!!!" (exclamation mine)

24 posted on 07/07/2009 12:37:26 PM PDT by califamily4W (Freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Absent Cap and Tax Obama has NO ENERGY POLICY.

And no source of funding for his other plans for America.

25 posted on 07/07/2009 12:42:01 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Things will devolve in that direction shortly, I think.


26 posted on 07/07/2009 12:49:15 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: califamily4W

“Of course the Democrats had help from eight Republicans, who are now on the receiving end of criticism of their own. It’s gotten so thick, reports one senior Republican aide, the defecting GOPers are looking to members of the leadership to bail them out. Those requests have, thus far, fallen on deaf ears, the attitude being that those eight Republican “Aye” votes allowed eight potentially vulnerable Democrats to skate on what was, for them, a tough vote.”

EXACTLY! Screw these numbskulls.


27 posted on 07/07/2009 12:52:17 PM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: califamily4W
No president likes to lose

with regards to that, I sense that Obama hasn't seen nothing yet. Who's the fool(s), those in his admin or him? None of them seem to be on the same page about anything. Gibbs is the worst, or the best, depending on ones political philosophy.

28 posted on 07/07/2009 1:00:22 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
State controlled media (SCaM) Headline?

CO2: Rich White People worst offenders
Carbon Tax On Individuals
"Minorities exhale little or no CO2," says experts' consensus.

29 posted on 07/07/2009 1:06:01 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: califamily4W; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

30 posted on 07/07/2009 2:40:24 PM PDT by steelyourfaith ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money" - Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"Obama has NO ENERGY POLICY"

Sure he does. Its called S 774 aka National Energy Security Act of 2009. Its the Senate's companion bill to the House's cap and trade bill.

31 posted on 07/07/2009 3:22:39 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: califamily4W

“those eight Republican ‘Aye’ votes allowed eight potentially vulnerable Democrats to skate on what was, for them, a tough vote.”

Those Aye votes provided cover for all 43 Democrat “No” votes. Every Democrat who voted no can say they voted that way because of “conviction.” Great, ain’t it?


32 posted on 07/07/2009 4:04:30 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our survival thread!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: califamily4W

The comments were fun to read... about 9 to 1 against this monstrosity.


33 posted on 07/07/2009 4:15:36 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our survival thread!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jillym
"Even better...it should be called “CRAP and TAX”"

Kneecap and Tax?

34 posted on 07/07/2009 4:25:36 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: califamily4W
"the defecting GOPers are looking to members of the leadership to bail them out"

"Bite Me!" seems and appropriate response.

"See your conservative challenger in the next Primary; we're backing him."

35 posted on 07/07/2009 8:47:11 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (It's the spending, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson