Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Time's interview and presentation is suprisingly free of bias. The interviewer lets Sarah speak and doesn't get argumentive or nasty with her. It's worth reading the whole thing.
1 posted on 07/07/2009 9:07:38 AM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: kristinn; SolidWood

So much for her supporting cap and trade, as some (Romneyites) have argued on here over the past couple of days...


2 posted on 07/07/2009 9:11:37 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Run Sarah Run!!!!!!!!


4 posted on 07/07/2009 9:18:20 AM PDT by Nextrush (Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan, I hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

THIS IS MY NEXT PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!!

LLS


5 posted on 07/07/2009 9:18:26 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Great article by Cal Thomas in World Magazine Web addition http://www.worldmag.com/webextra/15628 today, I don’t have time to post it right now. Don’t agree with everything but he makes some good points:

To rise and not fall - Cal Thomas
OPINION: There are several steps Sarah Palin must make if she is to have a future in national politics | Cal Thomas

Associated Press/Photo by Ron Edmonds
The soon to be former governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin, is like one of those soufflés my mother sometimes made. The recipe warned against premature removal from the oven because the dish would collapse.

That is the saga of Gov. Palin. Prematurely plucked from relative obscurity by John McCain and touted as a rising star by many Republican conservatives, Palin collapsed. Though she was treated unfairly and in ways that no liberal woman would have been—not even Hillary Clinton—she clearly was not prepared to discuss the issues, the command of which—or least familiarity of which—are essential to anyone seeking national office.

Palin energized the shrinking Republican base, but could never get beyond them to connect with independents and conservative Democrats who might have taken her seriously had she displayed more seriousness. It is not enough to talk about what has been lost in America. One must speak of a vision for the future and ways to reach it.

... (some of article omitted here) ...

If Palin is to have a future in national politics (assuming she wants one) there are several steps she must take. First, she needs a complete makeover. The big media will never admit they were wrong in their judgments, but they might write stories about the “new Sarah Palin.” She should hit the books and learn as much as she can about the modern world, history and court cases. She should read newspapers so that when future interviewers hit her with questions, she can dazzle them like a Jeopardy champion.

What she should not do is become a cable TV pundit. That’s too predictable. Instead, she might follow Ronald Reagan’s example and deliver a daily radio commentary. Radio takes the focus away from outward appearance and places it on the substance of what is said. She should write these commentaries herself, as Reagan did, and the outlets ought to include mainstream stations, as well as conservative and Christian ones.

Palin should hire a speech coach and follow that person’s advice. She has a pleasant enough speaking voice, but the tone needs to be adjusted, as do her word choices. “You betcha” should be banned from her vocabulary. Such slang may resonate well with some people, but national candidates should have rhetoric that soars and gets attention.

Lastly, she needs a hair, makeup, and wardrobe makeover. She is a beautiful woman, but appearance should not be the first thing one reacts to when people look at her.

There aren’t many second acts in politics because the media tend to gobble people up and constantly search for the “new” and exciting. Sarah Palin can be “born again” in a political sense and excite beyond her base if she allows herself to be “baked” at the proper temperature and for the right amount of time. If she does that, she may emerge again and this time she’ll rise, not fall.

© 2009 Tribune Media Services Inc.


10 posted on 07/07/2009 9:32:53 AM PDT by boxlunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

That it was Kristinn.

Sarah is running for President. I have absolutely no doubts in my mind, and this move of hers was brilliant. Pundits will be talking about it for years to come, but it was absolutely brilliant.


11 posted on 07/07/2009 9:33:01 AM PDT by Danae (Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Shouldn’t it be “affect change” rather than “effect change”?


16 posted on 07/07/2009 9:39:31 AM PDT by petitfour (Are you a Dead Fish American?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Lest we forget the REAL Sarah Palin:


17 posted on 07/07/2009 9:40:10 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

WOW, she really nails Obama in this article..NICE..A Republican who stands up against Obama, who wonder the libs are so damn scared of her, she speaks out against Obama while the rest of the GOP praises him and kisses his feet..LOVE the statement Cap and Tax..I hope Sarah goes after the So-called Republicans who voted yes. Sarah will bring REAL change


19 posted on 07/07/2009 9:41:48 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
it's quite apparent that I will not be the one to affect more fully that continued reform on a state level

Tsk, tsk, TIME: that should be "effect" not "affect"

24 posted on 07/07/2009 9:47:47 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Think of the D Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
She said what...?


26 posted on 07/07/2009 9:49:17 AM PDT by GalaxieFiveHundred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Now that she’s not a Governor, she can say anything that’s on her sweet, pretty conservative mind and have no fear that she’s taking time away from the State of Alaska . . . or that someone will try to get her fired.

She’s as FREE as you and I are. But I am not nearly as lovely as she is . . . you? (lol)


28 posted on 07/07/2009 9:50:31 AM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann in 2012. With Liz Cheney as Secretary of State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Just WOW.

Gentlemen, I think we have a voice.
29 posted on 07/07/2009 9:51:11 AM PDT by Antoninus (Time to fight back--donate to Free Republic, then donate to www.sarahpac.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Yeah, once she gets some platforms where she can say what she wants to say, I don’t think this is going to play out the way the pundits want it to. The problem is that people have gotten used to politicians who speak like lawyers because they are lawyers or are friends with lawyers. That means you have to carefully parse everything they say to see if they are hiding something in legalese. And they keep trying to do that with what she says and miss the point.


35 posted on 07/07/2009 10:00:37 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
The line has been drawn in the sand.

And Sarah Palin has just stepped across.

The left's worst nightmare just came true.

Go get 'em, Sarah!

37 posted on 07/07/2009 10:01:34 AM PDT by rintense (Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

“...I want to work for people who believe in that.”

I think this is the most interesting line in the interview. How does one interpret that?


39 posted on 07/07/2009 10:01:48 AM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism, it's the new black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Great interview. Sarah was spot on.


42 posted on 07/07/2009 10:05:17 AM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Bump for later read.


48 posted on 07/07/2009 10:20:49 AM PDT by khnyny ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Sarah Palin Slams Obama Policies as 'Immoral'

Liberals don't operate under moral principles. Look at their position on abortion, stem cells, euthanasia, Terri Schiavo, or medical procedures on the elderly, etc. Their positions on almost every issue are the opposite of what is moral. Shame? Outdated, outmoded - like a rotary telephone.

The only ones carrying the banner for morality (or who should be) are the Conservatives. The true conservatives - not the Conservatives-in-name-only.

58 posted on 07/07/2009 11:15:14 AM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Only dead fish go with the flow. -- Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

God bless her. I can’t help but smile a bit when I hear her weaving way of presenting a thought, but she’s spot on with her positions and philosophies. I really like that she’s going to jump in and support conservative candidates in 2010, 2012 and beyond. Even if she doesn’t make it to the White House herself (though I think she’d be an outstanding leader), she’ll be a powerful ally for those whom she supports. She’s one powerful force to be reckoned with.


63 posted on 07/07/2009 12:53:31 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Impeach President Soros!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
When you read the whole interview, although there are a few Sarah-isms in it, you can tell she's getting more and more comfortable in her national political skin. She's also, I think quite savvy in turning the libtards canard against them - they were really hoping to potshot her while she sat lame ducked (no pun intended) in Alaska...SORRY libtards...hahaha...

Dunno, if she can pull it off, but I sure do like her spunk, energy and love for family, God and country...

65 posted on 07/07/2009 5:35:22 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Country and the Tea Party! Take America Back! [I hate the TRAITORS in the enemedia.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson