Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Sarah start the Conservative Party?
me | july 3, 2009 | pauly cy

Posted on 07/03/2009 3:20:40 PM PDT by paulycy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141 next last
To: SlipKid77
She's up to something ...

Yep, and remember, last week, Rush said he was working on something very important? Makes you wonder doesn't it? :-)

81 posted on 07/03/2009 4:30:02 PM PDT by DHC-2 (my flags: http://www.jdlinn.com/liberty.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #82 Removed by Moderator

To: PhiKapMom

We have no time for people like you who have no backbone. Get out of our way.


83 posted on 07/03/2009 4:34:57 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

And imagine when they converge into one.


84 posted on 07/03/2009 4:36:02 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

You don’t have to worry — I am a rockribbed Republican so I am not getting in your way but I must be doing something right for you to tell me to get out of the way when I never was in your way.

Touchy aren’t you about 3rd parties. Sarah would NEVER join a 3rd party — she is not Ross Perot.


85 posted on 07/03/2009 4:37:18 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin for OK Governor/Coburn for Senate 2010 ! Mark Rubio for FL Senate 2010!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: DHC-2
Yep, and remember, last week, Rush said he was working on something very important? Makes you wonder doesn't it? :-)

Yes, it makes me wonder if this is a case of putting 2 and 2 together and making 22.
86 posted on 07/03/2009 4:39:47 PM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood
And imagine when they converge into one.

I don't get it, what do you mean?

87 posted on 07/03/2009 4:42:14 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

If she does, I’m in!


88 posted on 07/03/2009 4:42:25 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("I've conquered my goddam willpower." Don Marquis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood
We have no time for people like you who have no backbone. Get out of our way.

Get out of who's way, which boutique party do you belong to, or desire the rest of us to belong to?

89 posted on 07/03/2009 4:44:47 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

republican? LOL! Your party is as dead as Michael Jackson.


90 posted on 07/03/2009 4:44:58 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: AH_LiveRight

LOL, my what a inventive mind you have. So disagreeing with the derogatory word that is used by american-hating leftists, racists and paleo-cons is somehow equivalent to believing in Obama and all of GWB’s and McCains politics. LOLOLOLOLOLOL breathe LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL


91 posted on 07/03/2009 4:48:12 PM PDT by aft_lizard (One animal actually eats its own brains to conserve energy, we call them liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
I can tell you one person who would write a big fat multi-million dollar check to help a conservative third party along. George Soros

Yep, that is why most conservatives pray for more and stronger "third parties" for liberals and leftists, but not everyone seems to understand that, judging from this thread.

92 posted on 07/03/2009 4:49:22 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

If she starts a third Reform Conservative Party—I will join. What the Liberals have done to her was shameful but expected—what the Republicans did was worse. She was almost forced out of the party. If she bolts like a Bull Moose, so to will I and a lot of people I know. The Two party scam will be exposed for what it is—a two headed beast.


93 posted on 07/03/2009 4:50:17 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AH_LiveRight
This cult of personality adulation of GWB and then Palin gave us Zero.

You are dead wrong, FRiend. Zero's ascent was locked in with the nomination of McCain. Conservatives were going to sit on their hands or cast their vote not for McCain but rather against Obama.

Then came the announcement of Sarah for VP. The sea change was palpable! There was finally HOPE. Hope that Sarah could bring McCain back to the right, to be the sane voice of Conservatism in a McCain administration. Wallets opened spontaneously. Conservatives came back to the phone banks, to the neighborhood walks. Be in any local party HQ and what you heard was "I'm here because of Sarah." I was one of them and that's my testimony.

Too much hope to place on one person? Be cautious not to make this a cult of personality? Yes. But the excitement Sarah brings is not in how she says it but what she says. That is a world of difference.

No, Sarah did not give us Zero, she stopped him from claiming the "mandate" of a 50 state sweep that would have made the McGovern defeat look like a squeaker.

94 posted on 07/03/2009 4:50:36 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("I've conquered my goddam willpower." Don Marquis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SlipKid77; humblegunner
Very good point...thanks for reminding me. I did hear Rush say something about working on a "secret" project that he would not elaborate on...

Great. Vote for Rush, nitwit. You can have a "secret" hopey changey moment. Tune in, turn on, and drop out. Ditto

95 posted on 07/03/2009 4:51:11 PM PDT by AH_LiveRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Too much hope to place on one person? Be cautious not to make this a cult of personality?

In real life there are few strong, charismatic leaders. Since it's not possible to vote for some abstract ideal figurehead you must take a chance on backing a real human being for the duration of the fight. Once in the fight you stick by that person.

Calling it a "cult of personality" is just a weak false argument. Backing the right horse seems more appropriate.

96 posted on 07/03/2009 4:54:05 PM PDT by paulycy (Liberal DOUBLE-STANDARDS are HATE crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

Comment #97 Removed by Moderator

Comment #98 Removed by Moderator

To: paulycy
Uhhhhhhhh...we already have conserbative Third Parties -- they are called the Constitution Party & the American Independent Party
99 posted on 07/03/2009 5:03:11 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR; All

Yet those true conservative parties fails to get at least 1% of the vote.. Thank you but no thank you...


100 posted on 07/03/2009 5:05:30 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Can't Stop the Signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson