Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government dismisses charge against gun owner
gun rights examiner ^ | 2 July, 2009 | David Codrea

Posted on 07/03/2009 5:41:05 AM PDT by marktwain

The government has thrown in the towel in its prosecution of Albert Kwok-Leung Kwan for possession of a short barreled rifle. A June 25 order dismisses the indictment against him "based on the government's motion."

It's been a convoluted case. The feds have been trying to pin something on the guy for years, because he acted to preserve his own legal interests instead of assisting the government with theirs. From the blog Crime, Guns and Videotape, written by a former Chicago policeman:

[The FBI] really fixed Kwan for his refusal. They obtained a search warrant, kicked his door down and seized every firearm in his home. Kwan legally owned 100 machine guns along with some run of the mill semi-automatic firearms. The Agents took one of Kwan's rifles, a...semi-automatic M-14 copy, remanufactured the receiver, and installed new parts turning it to a machine gun! Since that [rifle] was not registered as a machine gun the agents charged Kwan for the federal felony under the National Firearms Act of 1934.

Per the United States District Court, Western District of Washington at Seattle:

The jury found defendant not guilty of Count I, which charged him with unlawful possession of a machinegun, namely a...M-14 rifle. As a result of the jury verdict, Count I was dismissed.

But the feds weren't done with Kwan.

[He] possessed two pistols and two shoulder stocks. One pistol, a Heckler & Koch VP70M, is capable of firing a three-round burst and therefore falls within the legal definition of a "machinegun.”

The other pistol, a Heckler & Koch VP70Z,1 is a semi-automatic, single-shot weapon, which alone does not constitute a firearm requiring registration...

Here's where it gets really illustrative of the lengths the government will go to destroy the life of a gun owner who will not bend to their will:

The two shoulder stocks are interchangeable and can be attached to either pistol. The stocks can also be used as a holster for either pistol. To enable the VP70M to fire three-round bursts, the shoulder stock must be attached; absent the stock, the VP70M will not operate in fully automatic (machinegun) mode. When combined with the VP70Z, however, the shoulder stock will not alter the firing mode, but the resulting weapon will constitute a single-shot rifle having a barrel of less than 16 inches in length, and will therefore qualify as a firearm requiring registration...

Even though the stock was not attached to the VP70Z, the government charged Kwan with having a short-barrel rifle and the jury found him guilty--after a proposed defense instruction to them was conveniently not allowed:

The Court rejected defendant’s proposed instruction, which would have added as a fourth element that “the defendant assembled the VP70Z into a short-barrel rifle.”

Because of this, on August 15, 2007, the District Court "GRANTED defendant’s motion for a new trial."

You can read the order for yourself:

(Order at site, I could not download it from a dialup)

So where does this leave us? After years of harassment, including holding him for 23 days, confiscating his property, ordering him not to possess firearms, forcing him to surrender his passport and to post a $250,000 bond, and spending--exactly how much in legal costs for both sides?--the government simply files a motion to dismiss the indictment?

And that's supposed to be it?

Will anyone be accountable to explain to us just what the hell happened here? Based on the utter absence of any reporting on this dismissal by "Authorized Journalists"--who were more than happy to paint Kwan as some kind of domestic terrorist back when he was having his life ripped apart--I'd have to conclude that's not bloody likely.

------------

Oathkeepers announce new website

Check out their new digs here.

Then go read this article on "Threepers" and Oathkeepers by Charlie Cutshaw at Gun Digest.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitution; gun; short
Wow. I wonder what the court costs were for this fellow. To be a legal owner of machine guns, you have to be squeaky clean, yet the Feds went to extreme lenghths to persecute this guy because he would not become an informant for him. Sounds a little like the Ruby Ridge case.
1 posted on 07/03/2009 5:41:05 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain
OK...here is all you need to know.
Al is a good guy.
2 posted on 07/03/2009 5:50:50 AM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
What happened here is a shining example of the abuses that federal “officials” can and do get away with when they are aided and abetted by the media. There are too few checks on government prosecutions. They can bring the full force of their offices down on you. Can you afford to defend yourself?
Under what circumstances is it proper to incarcerate someone for 26 days for what under even the most liberal interpretation of the facts shows he was not engaging in illegal activity? He had many licensed machine guns. He wasn't in the business of converting them to sell to drug dealers. In fact, federal agents committed a felony when they assembled parts into a machine gun.
The government can spend millions of dollars harassing this guy, and what recourse will he have? I doubt he can even sue for his legal costs. Is this anyones idea of justice?
3 posted on 07/03/2009 6:04:36 AM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 163)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Agents took one of Kwan's rifles, a...semi-automatic M-14 copy, remanufactured the receiver, and installed new parts turning it to a machine gun! Since that [rifle] was not registered as a machine gun the agents charged Kwan for the federal felony under the National Firearms Act of 1934.


4 posted on 07/03/2009 6:05:16 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

He really needs to counter sue for false arrest, etc, etc, etc.
He should also personally sue the individual agents that brought that wrath down upon him. They should not be allowed to get off the hook so easily without at least paying his court costs.


5 posted on 07/03/2009 6:16:35 AM PDT by lgjhn23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
To be a legal owner of machine guns, you have to be squeaky clean, yet the Feds went to extreme lengths to persecute this guy because he would not become an informant for him. Sounds a little like the Ruby Ridge case.

He should have just gone along with them, then ratted out every Marxist he knew.

6 posted on 07/03/2009 6:26:34 AM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23

Like the man said. Not Bloody Likely.

Did you ever see the movie with Paul Newman, Absence of Malice?

Let some Rinky-Dink government agent with ten cents worth of authority get down on you and you are in a heap of trouble.


7 posted on 07/03/2009 6:32:14 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

They will go one house at a time, bullying and using their badges to avoid arrest themselves.

This Kwan might need our help.


8 posted on 07/03/2009 6:34:54 AM PDT by JudgemAll (control freaks, their world & their problem with my gun and my protecting my private party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
But I have a couple 2x4's in the garage. I could physically fashion a stock from one and attach it to the back of a pistol, so I must be guilty of having a short-barreled rifle too. Even if I didn't have any 2x4's I have a Lowe's a mile away and a Home Depot a mile the other direction that do. And even if the stores didn't I'm sure BATFE has a couple, and as we can see from this case, if the BATFE guy does something and it's illegal, they can try their boss (the private citizen) for having done so, even though everyone admits he never did.
9 posted on 07/03/2009 6:39:02 AM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The proper technique for confronting irrationality is, oddly enough, being even more irrational.

In this case, the government wanted him as an informant, and were willing to coerce him to become one. And this is fairly common, so they are more than ready to encounter resistance, or humbled cooperation.

But what they are *not* expecting, or able to deal with, is “boisterous cooperation”. That is, he should have agreed to be an informant for the government, but not to be humble about it.

He should have held a press conference, loudly declaring himself to now be a government informant, and that in full cooperation with federal authorities, he will now inform on and implicate *anyone* they tell him to, and in any way they want.

Heck, he should even run a full page ad in a newspaper agreeing to the federals dropping charges against him, so he is now employed by the (named federal agents) as a professional criminal accuser against anyone they want to arrest for anything.

To make things extra interesting, he could even put a list of celebrities on the bottom of the ad, claiming to have met them at least once, so that they are all potential targets for indictment, with him testifying as to what he was told to say against them. Most of them, of course, should be high ranking Democrat politicians.


10 posted on 07/03/2009 7:33:41 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Agents took one of Kwan's rifles, a...semi-automatic M-14 copy, remanufactured the receiver, and installed new parts turning it to a machine gun!

Aren't these 'agents' guilty of the illegal manufacture of a machine gun?

11 posted on 07/03/2009 7:36:55 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

They did the same with Randy Weaver. However, it ended a lot worse for him, as he lost his wife and son, thanks to government assassins. He was awarded 3 million bucks by the court after he was found not guilty, but what good does that do a person whose wife and son are dead?


12 posted on 07/03/2009 7:47:59 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
I like it...

so when 'cornered', simply get the deal in writing, and as soon as they put ya on the street, more or less blow yer own cover in a very LARGE way ???

also like the celeb touch...

13 posted on 07/03/2009 10:46:32 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Luke 22:36...Trust in the Lord...=...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

You jest.

Shoelaces have been declared machineguns.
I kid you not.


14 posted on 07/03/2009 7:30:29 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (John Galt was exiled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Sadly, I know.


15 posted on 07/03/2009 7:40:34 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
They will go one house at a time, bullying and using their badges to avoid arrest themselves

Not "will go", are going. Doing it in Houston right now.(Hoplophobe spin on the story) One of their "targets" turned out to be a pastor who bought two target pistols. Other folks have been told they'd be "reported" if they didn't let the agents paw through their gun collections, without a warrant. Ostensibly this is to stop the "deluge" of guns going to the Mexican drug gangs. But of course we all know that the drug lords aren't buying their full auto ARs and AK's at US gun shops, or gun shows. They don't need to have some "mule" buy the guns illegally in Texas and haul them back to Mexico, they get 'em direct from the overseas, or second hand through corrupt members of the Mexican police and military.

16 posted on 07/03/2009 9:28:13 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson