Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UPDATES ON TRIP TO WASHINGTON (Monday June 29th), SEE BELOW: (Grand Jury Presentments)
American Grand Jury ^ | June 30, 2009

Posted on 06/30/2009 7:42:41 AM PDT by Man50D

UPDATES ON TRIP TO WASHINGTON (Monday June 29th): text via phone from Chalice: posted in central time by my phone.

Carl Swensson and Mack Ellis served the 11-page Presentments to President Barack Obama, at the White House for FRAUD and TREASON.

11:49am Chalice has video. (woooo hoooo documents being accepted) 11:57am Presentments in the hands of Secret Service 12:06pm 2 Secret Service, names John and Jessica, received presentments

They were denied entrance to the Dept of Justice (Eric Holder)

1:06 FBI has been served and they are on the way to District Court

3:05 pm They at US District Court. They were served.

3:29 We served Dept of Justice. They will get back to us. We have a judge who will review it.

3:32 We are on the House serving 4 Congressmen.

5:44pm Presentments delivered to Senate Minority Leader McConnell, TX Senators Hutchinson and Cornyn, Ron Paul, and Michelle Bachmann

They are on way back to hotel and will start again tomorrow. If I hear more details later about today, then I will post them here.

(Excerpt) Read more at americangrandjury.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americangrandjury; eligibility; obama

1 posted on 06/30/2009 7:42:42 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I think he’ll be out of town. More of his overseas apology tour, you know.


2 posted on 06/30/2009 7:43:55 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I’m sure all this makes some folks feel good, but it has utterly no legal standing.


3 posted on 06/30/2009 7:47:13 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I’m sure all this makes some folks feel good, but it has utterly no legal standing.

Read all the information provided at the website before making such a blanket statement.
4 posted on 06/30/2009 7:48:33 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Read all the information provided at the website before making such a blanket statement.

I have read the material.

I’m sure all this makes some folks feel good, but it has utterly no legal standing.

5 posted on 06/30/2009 7:50:28 AM PDT by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Abundy

but it has utterly no legal standing.

Not only doesn’t it have legal standing, but now these people are on watch lists all over. I’m sure everyone they “served” got a huge laugh over it.
There are things that we should be doing, but this isn’t one of them.


6 posted on 06/30/2009 7:54:56 AM PDT by lojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; STARWISE

God bless them!


7 posted on 06/30/2009 7:55:49 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; LucyT

May the force be with them....


8 posted on 06/30/2009 7:58:03 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

((((((( APPLAUSE )))))))

If nothing else, this action serves notice to the gate keepers and those they serve, that The People mean business.


9 posted on 06/30/2009 8:01:40 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; April Lexington; fhayek; ...

~~PING!


10 posted on 06/30/2009 8:03:06 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lojo

If it has no legal standing; why did Holder deny entrance and what are you suggestions that we do something else? What something elses?


11 posted on 06/30/2009 8:13:54 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

AWESOME!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4s3iqlQxvI


12 posted on 06/30/2009 8:24:00 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

It seems to me to be a form of “petition for redress of greivences” at a minimum. Which is certainlys something that has political, if not legal, standing.

The entire idea that the legal system is remote and unavailable to ordinary citizens is a liberal one. It’s taken 3 or 4 generations to catch on. Now the libtards control the law schools and bar associations and allow obviously incompetent traitors to be elevated to the SC.

*THAT* all has “legal standing”. So maybe “legal standing” ain’t all it’s cracked up to be.


13 posted on 06/30/2009 8:24:30 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Abundy
I’m sure all this makes some folks feel good, but it has utterly no legal standing.

That's true if you exclude the fifth Amenmdment. You clearly have not read all the material.
14 posted on 06/30/2009 8:52:53 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I’m sure all this makes some folks feel good, but it has utterly no legal standing.

I think this is mostly because people have been convinced it has none. At one point in time it clearly did have standing; and so did the Constitution.

ML/NJ

15 posted on 06/30/2009 8:57:14 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
It seems to me to be a form of “petition for redress of greivences” at a minimum.

Call up your congresscritters. Email the White House. Work for the congresscritter of your choice.

But the term 'grand jury' implies standing that simply is not there.

16 posted on 06/30/2009 9:28:29 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson